Thursday, April 30, 2026

Reparations aren’t about justice. They’re an act of revenge

 Douglas Murray  

The people who push for reparations in America today claim to be doing so in the name of racial harmony. In fact, it’s hard to imagine anything more likely to put a bomb under race relations in this country. It has become just another tool of vengeance in the fevered anti-Western, anti-American spirit of our age. 


"Ten years ago, the idea of “reparations” sat on the political fringes in America. The question of whether or not compensation should once have been paid to former slaves had died out.  Not least because by the start of the 21st century, no one in America had actually suffered from slavery. The country was a century and a half away from the bloody civil war it had fought over the issue.
"But there’s a tendency in our own age which does not allow wounds to mend or heal. Indeed, there is a movement that locates long-healed wounds in order to rip them open again. And then complain about the hurt caused to themselves.
''In 2014, the writer Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote an essay in The Atlantic making “The Case for Reparations.” In recent times, few articles have had more impact. The issue of reparations began to be picked up by the radical left and then made its way to the political center. By the time of the Democratic primaries in 2020 all of the party’s candidates were willing to talk about the issue. Some, including Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren, expressed support for some form of reparations. Such candidates pointed to the disparity between average household wealth in white families and black families in America.
"Once the Democrats were in power, one of the first things they did in Congress was apply pressure on President Biden to set up a commission to study reparations for black Americans both for slavery and for “systemic racism” — a guilty verdict that was already in." . . .
Others also see this as a route to justice. In 2020, San Francisco passed the CAREN Act, which made it a hate crime to make a “racially motivated” 911 call against a black person “without reasonable suspicion of a crime.” The name comes from the derogatory term “Karen,” which in recent years has come to mean a white woman with entitled energy. The act makes it a potential crime to call the cops on a person who is black and makes white people doing so have to wonder whether it will be they who the police take in for questioning. It is also noteworthy, in passing, that in the current era, racial slurs are actually cool and can be written into law so long as the people they demean are white women." 

 As in the "I got that white girl", said by a man who should have been locked up but was repeatedly set free.

Toddler-Like Law Students Should Leave America for a Real Education

 Teresa R. Manning › American Greatness 

"Worse, law students are supposed to be preparing for the legal profession and the justice system, where words, debate, and argument should replace physical threats, intimidation, and incivility. Yet law students increasingly reject discourse in favor of shout downs." 


"Last week, UCLA law students shouted profanities, held signs with graphic obscenities, and booed a Department of Homeland Security attorney invited to campus to speak by the law school’s Federalist Society chapter. Video shows a crowded hallway where students scream at the lawyer when he arrives and then continue howling and jeering in the lecture room, which has perhaps 50 students, plus a few older attendees as well as security guards in back. Students also hold up vulgar signs—“F–k You Loser” “How’s Trump’s C–k Taste?”—and make vulgar gestures while grinning and giggling. They slouch, put their feet on desks, stand up and sit down repeatedly, and let their phones ring to disrupt the presentation. The older audience members look annoyed and exasperated.
"What a zoo.
"This circus atmosphere sadly confirms the anti-intellectual wasteland that much of American higher education has become, with law schools no exception. Many seem more fit for spoiled toddlers than serious students.
"Unfortunately, the temper tantrum shout down seems almost a new normal in much of American legal education: In 2022, law students at Yale blew horns, stomped their feet, and shouted obscenities at Alliance Defending Freedom counsel Kristen Waggoner and Yale law professor Kate Stith, who was trying to moderate the event—which was on free speech, no less—and who told the students to “grow up.” Then again, in 2023, Judge Kyle Duncan of the Fifth Circuit tried to speak at Stanford Law School but was similarly heckled by angry students—who called him a racist, of course—and was then even scolded by a school administrator who not only did not bring order but said she was uncomfortable with the judge’s presence, not with the presence of angry, frothing students. Similar law school incidents have occurred at Cornell, Georgetownthe City University of New York, and the University of California Hastings.
"When will Congress and state legislatures stop funding these insane asylums masquerading as places of learning?" . . .   More...

Teresa R. Manning is Policy Director at the National Association of Scholars, President of the Virginia Association of Scholars, and a former law professor at Virginia’s Scalia Law School, George Mason University. 

Can Harvard Be Reformed? › Daniel Oliver   
"Harvard’s gatekeepers tout resumes but hide convictions, revealing an elite more committed to ideological conformity than to intellectual honesty." 


. . . "J. B. Pritzker (the brother of a Board of Overseers member) called Trump a “wannabe dictator.” Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., described the Trump administration as a “totalitarian regime.” He also called legislation tied to Trump a “moral abomination.” Former President Joe Biden said, “Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic.” Liz Cheney, former congresswoman from Wyoming, said, “There has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump.” Senator Bernie Sanders, Socialist, Vt., called Trump “the most dangerous president in modern American history.” Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., called Trump “a domestic enemy of the Constitution.” And of course, there are more.
"​"Can America survive if prominent politicians keep spreading that sort of hate throughout the land?" . . .
Daniel Oliver (H ’61–64) is Chairman Emeritus of the Board of the Education and Research Institute and a Director of Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy in Pasadena, Calif. In addition to serving as Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission under President Reagan, he was Executive Editor and subsequently Chairman of the Board of William F. Buckley Jr.’s National Review.

"Dartmouth College president Sian Beilock is not afraid to say why she believes American universities have lost the public’s trust. (Caleb Kenna/The New York Times/Redux)

"Better late than never, the toniest institutions in higher education are coming around to the realization that “echo chambers do not produce the best teaching, research, or scholarship,” as a Yale University report put it earlier this month. Today, we have two looks at the Ivies’ about-face." . . .

'White supremacy' was a leftist scam

 'White supremacy' was a leftist scam   "When facts are stranger than fiction, pundits will say, “You can’t make this stuff up.” But actually, you can make this stuff up — that turns out to be the Left’s modus operandi." . . .

Lucianne.com News Forum

Blind spot: Media amplified white supremacy narrative as SPLC funded Charlottesville organizer   . . . "For decades, the SPLC has positioned itself as the nation’s preeminent watchdog, which maintains a controversial "Hate Map" that has increasingly labeled benign conservative organizations and religious groups as hate groups. 

"The DOJ alleges the SPLC utilized a network of shell companies – with names like "Center Investigative Agency" and "Fox Photography" – to disguise payments to individuals associated with those groups. 

"While the SPLC claims these were legitimate payments for undercover informants to monitor threats, the FBI and DOJ allege the funds were used to ensure that "hate" remained visible enough to justify the SPLC’s mission and purpose.  

"The group's recent financial success can likely be attributed to the claims of escalating white supremacy it had proffered." . . .

Will The Real Hate Group Please Stand Up – Issues & Insights   “'The scurrilous left-wing group had to pay for racism to meet demand,” Dan McLaughlin, National Review"

A Book that Gets Race Relations Right - Jeffrey Folks 

. . ."What is being taught in our schools is dishonesty toward our own past, and the repercussions are great.  When Europeans came to Africa, they did not do so with the intention of enslaving or repressing the native population.  Native blacks interacted with white settlers in the way that all human beings interact: by trading, learning, engaging in work, and appreciating another’s culture.  It is the humanity of our past — and the goodness — that today’s educators refuse to acknowledge."

California’s Climate Overreach

  American Greatness  California is strangling its own energy base—then blaming oil companies for the predictable fallout of shortages, wildfires, and policies built on ideology instead of economics.



"Even if the most dire climate scenarios are accurate, and humanity must transition away from fossil fuel, it can’t happen overnight. The rational approach is to first develop alternative sources of energy without precipitously destroying the industries that reliably produce oil and natural gas. Once alternatives are available at a competitive price and in sufficient quantities, demand naturally migrates to the alternatives. Meanwhile, the oil and gas industry, recognizing that their core business is to provide energy, actually stays healthy by also investing in the transition.':None of that is happening in California. The approach the state’s politicians have chosen is irrational and predatory. For more than twenty years, they have legislated and litigated the state’s oil and gas companies down to a fraction of their former size, making up most of the resulting energy shortage not with alternative energy, but with imports.
"A recent and particularly brazen case of this ongoing harassment comes in the form of Senate Bill 982, something that only last week came perilously close to moving to a floor vote. Under the moral masquerade of requiring restitution for allegedly causing climate change, which in turn allegedly caused wildfires, what this bill really amounted to was a state-sponsored shakedown. SB 982 is a vivid example of how California’s legislature is determined to cannibalize and ultimately destroy entire industries in order to pay for disasters of their own making.
"SB 982 would impose liability on fossil fuel companies for “climate-attributable damages,” expected to be assessed in billions of dollars. It would empower California’s attorney general to sue the state’s oil companies without even needing to prove fault, negligence, or specific causation by an individual company.
"This bill is not only legalized extortion, but also a total disregard for economic reality. Combustible fuels remain the primary engine of civilization, and they’re not going anywhere for at least the next several decades. Despite this unavoidable fact, California’s in-state oil industry is already on the verge of implosion. The results are easily quantifiable." . . .More...

Savannah Guthrie sobs 'I'm so sorry Mommy' over fears her fame triggered Nancy's kidnap and says speculation about family involvement 'piles pain upon pain' |

 Daily Mail Online   

Savannah Guthrie sobs 'I'm so sorry Mommy' over fears her fame triggered Nancy's kidnap and says speculation about family involvement 'piles pain upon pain'


"Savannah Guthrie burst into tears as she apologized to her mother Nancy amid fears that her fame and fortune may have triggered the abduction.

"Speaking on NBC's Today – the show she usually anchors –  on Thursday Savannah said her brother Camron was the first person to realize that 84-year-old Nancy's February 1 abduction may have been linked to the TV star's fame and wealth.

"Savannah said: 'My brother, he was in the military, he saw right away what this was. He said: "I think she's been kidnapped for ransom."

"'I said "Do you think, because of me?"

"'He said "Sorry sweetie, yeah, maybe." But I knew that.' 

"Savannah said that she, Camron and their sister Annie still do not know for sure what triggered Nancy's February 1 abduction from her $1.4million home in Tucson, Arizona – before breaking down at the thought that her fame may have encouraged the abductor to strike. 

"'I don't know that it's because she's my mom and somebody thought , "Oh that girl, that lady has money, we could make a quick buck".' 

"'Too much to bear to think that I brought this to her bedside, that it's because of me. I just have to say, "I'm so sorry, Mommy. I'm so sorry",' Savannah told Hoda Kotb on NBC Today on Thursday

"'I'm sorry to my sister and my brother and my kids and my nephew and Tommy and my brother-in-law, just, like, I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry.'" . . . More...