Disgraced Jew-baiter Thomas Massie Humiliated by 10 Point Loss

 Nolte: 

At the same time, never did I believe I would live to see the day when a sitting congressman could say something straight out of the Jew-baiting Ku Klux Klan handbook and not be roundly condemned. Hopefully, the House of Representatives will censure him before he prances out of office in a Stephen Colbert-style cloud of self-celebration.

"After losing his primary to former Navy SEAL Ed Gallrein, incumbent U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) is about to have a lot more time on his hands to hate Jews and pretend he cares about Jeffrey Epstein’s victims.

"While it’s glorious that this self-regarding narcissist lost, even more glorious is that he got himself humiliated by a ten-point margin — ten points — 55 to 45 percent, with 99 percent of the vote counted.

"Wait, there’s more…

"If you want to understand President Trump’s ability to deliver votes, the math is pretty remarkable." . . .

. . . "Personally, I want to thank Massie for making his defeat all the sweeter with these opening lines from his despicable concession speech: 

Massie: "I would have come out sooner but I had to call my opponent to concede and it took a while to find him in Tel Aviv"

More...

Mosque Shooting Revives Scrutiny Over 9/11 Ties, Imam’s Pro‑Oct. 7 Remarks

 Breitbart To post more on this would be to make a case for the actions of the murderous shooters which must be condemned. They were no better than Hamas was that Oct 7th except they had no chance to rape their victims and cook infants alive. We must believe the worshippers at the mosque hated those atrocities. TD

"Lallia Allali, wife of Imam Taha Hassane of the Islamic Center of San Diego, post this horrific image to her Facebook profile. The graphic shows a Jewish star murdering babies with “the devil is killing” at the bottom."

. . . "The Union-Tribune later described the post as “a graphic and deplorable antisemitic image,” writing that after confirming the repost, “we accepted her resignation and removed her from the list of board members and contributors on our website.”

"The University of San Diego similarly announced that Allali had stepped away from teaching, stating: “While individuals have the right to express their views on their personal accounts, they do not reflect the views of USD leadership nor any official position of the university.”

"Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean and global social action director of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, sharply condemned the post at the time, calling it a modern “blood libel” and describing the imagery as “despicable and deplorable.”

Part I: The Politicization of the Federal Courts During the Second Trump Presidency

 American Greatness   

The ideological concentration of injunctions in five jurisdictions is not accidental. Activist legal organizations deliberately file in districts where they know sympathetic Obama or Biden appointees sit. The ACLU, SPLC-affiliated groups, and the network of progressive legal nonprofits have essentially mapped the federal judiciary for political opportunity, identifying which judges will reliably deliver the results their donors demand. 

"Many rank-and-file Republicans and political commentators have expressed shock at the unprecedented lawfare being employed by the Democrat Party and its political allies against President Trump during his second term. Over 700 lawsuits have been filed against the Trump administration, and the number of executive orders impeded/blocked by Democrat/left-wing activist judges currently exceeds 200 (full and partial).

"This is Part I of a two-part series that examines the politicization of the federal judiciary by the Democrat left and the crisis it presents for our constitutional republic.

A Constitutional Crisis Unlike Any Before

"When President Donald Trump returned to office in January 2025, carrying one of the most decisive electoral mandates in modern American history—winning the popular vote, the Electoral College, and commanding congressional majorities—the American people had spoken with clarity. They voted for border security, executive accountability, bureaucratic reform, and a rollback of the radical progressive agenda that had reshaped federal policy during the Biden years.

"What greeted that mandate was not the loyal opposition of a democratic republic but something increasingly difficult to characterize as anything other than a judicial insurrection: a coordinated, systematic campaign by Democrat-appointed federal judges to nullify the results of a free election through the mechanisms of the courtroom. The scale, speed, audacity, and ideological uniformity of the resistance was—and remains—without precedent in American constitutional history.

"This analysis examines that resistance from a traditionalist constitutional conservative perspective: one grounded in the original understanding of the separation of powers, the proper role of Article III courts, the democratic legitimacy of the executive branch, and the republican principle that elections must mean something." . . .

Case Studies in Judicial Overreach:

1. Judge James Boasberg and the Alien Enemies Act Contempt Trap
2. Judge Brian Murphy and the Vaccine Schedule Takeover
3. Obama-Appointed Judge Blocks Immigration Court Reform
4. The Forum Shopping Ecosystem

"Concluding Thoughts:  Part I ends here. Part II will cover Democrat lawfare coordination, the Democrats’ deployment of foreign judges and the associated cultural disconnect, the issue of democratic (small d) legitimacy, the Sotomayor problem, and remedies for the problem."Full article...

A Democrat Called for Imprisoning American Zionists – Her Party Blamed the GOP

The Federalist Papers 

 "She did not emerge from nowhere. She emerged from a political ecosystem that has made anti-Zionist rhetoric increasingly normalized within Democratic coalition politics. Jeffries knows this. His statement does not engage it."

Would AOC fake-cry for Jews who are locked up by Democrats?

"A Democratic candidate for Congress proposed turning a Texas immigration detention facility into a prison for Americans targeted by their religious identity. She is still in the runoff. Her party condemned the words and moved on to blaming someone else. "This is not a fringe story. It happened in a real primary, in a real congressional district, and the candidate is still on the ballot. Key Facts

 • Maureen Galindo, a sex therapist and housing activist, is the Democratic primary runoff candidate in Texas’ 35th Congressional District.

 • Galindo posted on Instagram that she would convert the Karnes ICE Detention Center “into a prison for American Zionists and former ICE officers for human trafficking.” 

 • Her post continued: “It will also be a castration processing center for pedophiles, which will probably be most of the Zionists.” 

• House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries stated: “This vile language by her is disqualifying and has no place in American politics, and certainly not in the Democratic Party.”

• Jeffries and DCCC Chair Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-WA) issued a joint condemnation, but in the same statement blamed Lead Left PAC, a group whose metadata PunchBowl News linked to a Republican fundraising platform. Who controls the PAC has not been independently confirmed. 

 • As of publication, Galindo has not withdrawn from the runoff. 

She Made the Ballot

"Galindo is not a protest candidate who filed to make a point and lost. She competed in a Democratic primary in a real congressional district and advanced to a runoff. That process has filters. Party structures, endorsements, voter engagement, candidate vetting. Every one of those filters passed her through.

 "The runoff means Democratic primary voters in Texas’ 35th chose her as one of the top finishers. That is not a fringe outcome. That is the system working as designed, and the system chose her. 

The PAC Deflection

"Jeffries and DelBene’s joint statement condemned Galindo’s words, but pivoted immediately to Lead Left PAC. The PAC is described as having metadata linked to a Republican fundraising platform, though who controls it has not been confirmed. The implication was that Republican money had amplified or manufactured this candidacy. 

"But Galindo posted those words on her own Instagram account. No PAC authored them. The question of who funds her campaign is legitimate and worth investigating separately. It does not explain the post, and it does not answer how she advanced in a Democratic primary. "What Accountability Actually Looks Like Jeffries called the language “disqualifying,” but Galindo remains qualified to run. Words have meaning only when they carry consequences. The DCCC has tools at its disposal. It can withhold support, coordinate with district party organizations, and communicate clearly that the condemnation is not performative. "None of that is on the public record as of this writing. The condemnation was issued. The race continues." . . . – The Federalist Papers Source: Just The News, May 2026 — Source: Just The News, May 2026

Democrats are embracing genocidal antisemitism - Andrea Widburg

Around the world, and especially here at home in the Democrat party, the Islamo-leftists’ fanatic hatred for Jews is creating a very scary 1938 vibe

. . . "I was born 16 years after WWII ended. Growing up, I naively thought that the worst of antisemitism had been permanently purged from the Western world, and certainly would never take root in America. I’m stunned by how wrong I was." . . .