Sunday, September 21, 2025

Congressional Black Caucus Reject Resolution Honoring Charlie Kirk

 Conservative Tree House   

"This is clear case in point, that proves the Great Ron White famous statement ” You can’t fix stupid”… 

"A House resolution [HR.719 – HERE] was offered today recognizing the tragic murder of Charlie Kirk and honoring his legacy. Forty-two members of the Congressional Black Caucus voted against the resolution [Roll Call Here], 4 CBC members voted present, 4 CBC members didn’t vote, once again affirming their intent to divide the country based on race.

WASHINGTON – […] In a statement following the House’s approval of the resolution, which received support from more than 90 Democrats, the caucus denounced political violence and the killing of Kirk, but said individuals must condemn violence “without abandoning our right to speak out against ideas that are inconsistent with our values as Americans.”

[…] The caucus outlined some of Kirk’s past comments that they said they “strongly” disagreed with, listing “his belief that the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ended racial segregation, was a mistake; his denial that systemic racism exists; his promotion of the Great Replacement theory; and his offensive claims about Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Michelle Obama, and Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee lacking adequate cognitive ability.”

Forty-two members of the CBC voted against the resolution, according to a POLITICO analysis of Friday morning’s roll call vote, making up 72 percent of the 58 Democrats who opposed the measure. Five members of the caucus voted yes on the resolution, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. Another four members of the caucus voted present, and four members didn’t vote at all. (read more)

"The final vote was 310-58 (42 nays from CBC), with 95 Democrats supporting the resolution, which was brought forward by Speaker Mike Johnson." . . .

The non-scandal that is Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension

 Andrea Widburg  

"One of those conditions is that you can’t broadcast false information about a crime or catastrophe if it will cause public harm. Given the overheated temperature at which America is operating now, if Kimmel knowingly misstated information about Kirk’s murder in order to foment unruliness and hatred, ABC can lose its license."


"Five days after Charlie Kirk’s assassination, the FBI and Utah law enforcement informed the public that Kirk’s alleged killer is a leftist gay man in a relationship with a mentally ill man who thinks he’s an animal and a woman, and who seems to follow “furry” pedophile cartoonists. Nevertheless, on September 15, late-night host Jimmy Kimmel did a monologue implying that the killer was a MAGA activist. I don’t pretend to know Kimmel’s beliefs when he made that statement, but it was incredibly cruel and light-years away from the publicly available facts.

"I suspect that, as much as anything, it was an attention getter, as Kimmel tried to woo back his audience. Kimmel has been playing to a hard left audience for years now. Nevertheless, in the second Trump era, Kimmel still managed to lose 43% of that audience over eight months. Given how leftists responded to Kirk’s death (viciously and irrationally), he probably thought that if he, too, were vicious and irrational, they’d return home. Instead, in addition to losing his audience, Kimmel lost his job.

"The same leftists who’d thrilled to Kirk’s murder were utterly appalled that Kimmel was given the boot. How dare the network sack him (well, suspend him indefinitely) for saying something cruel, inaccurate, and offensive? Hasn’t ABC heard of free speech? And the whole suspension thing wasn’t voluntary anyway, they cried, because the Trump administration had threatened to destroy it if it didn’t fire Kimmel." . . .

. . . "Given that the government has the power, there’s no reason not to use the power. And the fact that Democrats might be mean later is not a reason to restrain ourselves now. After all, Democrats have already demonstrated that they will use both fair means and foul to their utmost in order to destroy conservatives.

"If we keep being super pure and playing by antiquated rules of political conduct, we will ultimately be destroyed. " . . .

So sad to see the political climate on the left dragging us all down. TD

UPDATED: Lefties leave one-star reviews for coffee chain that honored Charlie Kirk

Starbucks is the Ben and Jerry's of coffee. TD

Monica Showalter  "It's hard to say which is worse: A coffee chain that refuses to honor Charlie Kirk on its cup labels, or one that does -- and attracts raging leftists like lice.

"Out in the land of Tesla scratchers -- tony rich northern San Diego County -- we are seeing the latter:  

Radical leftists are leaving 1 ⭐️ reviews for a San Diego coffee shop because their cups say “We love you” & “Thank you Charlie Kirk.” I’ve been to both Carlsbad & Rancho Santa Fe locations. Great owners, great coffee, in real mugs. Please support Invita CafĂ©.


"Here's a good video (I was not able to embed it) from X of a local citizen journalist interviewing coffee-goers at the Carlsbad location.

"They were a happy bunch and liked the 'Thank you, Charlie Kirk' stickers on their cups, which were placed there by the owner who was friends with the man and who said she "wanted to honor him." 

"The customers at the busy place said they liked Kirk, too, with one showing the citizen journalist the barrage of insults he drew on Instagram from leftists after he said he wanted to check the coffee shop out. Like a lot of people in San Diego, he was Filipino, but that didn't stop flaming leftists from yelling 'white supremacist' at him." . . . More...

All to explain how Gavin Newsom gets elected. TD

UPDATE" Starbucks Responds to Viral Charlie Kirk Drink Order Controversy

United States on the Cartel Cleanup

The Founders Code


"Only recently did Mexico agree to extradite 26 cartel leaders to the United States which actually is the second time in just a few months. We often wonder why it takes so long to get Mexico to cooperate much less build cases in a court of law to ensure a win. Well, for some background, Associated Press has published the following, which is a good explanation…so read on.

It begins with a car accident two years ago in Tennessee….

"In part from the AP:  The cases, as outlined in court documents, provide a glimpse into how drugs produced by violent cartels in large labs in Mexico flow across the U.S. border and reach American streets. They also highlight the violent fallout that drug trafficking leaves in its path from the mountains of Mexico to small U.S. towns.

“ 'These cases in particular serve as a powerful reminder of the insidious impacts that global cartels can have on our local American communities,” Matthew Galeotti, acting assistant attorney general in charge of the Justice Department’s criminal division said in an interview with The Associated Press. “The chain started with a violent cartel in Mexico and it ended with law enforcement being shot at in a small town.”

"United Cartels is an umbrella organization made up of smaller cartels that have worked for different groups over time. It holds a fierce grip over the western state of Michoacan, Mexico.

"United Cartels is not as widely known as Jalisco New Generation, but given its role as a prolific methamphetamine producer, it has become a top tier target for U.S. law enforcement. It was one of eight groups recently named foreign terrorist organizations by the Trump administration.

A car crash and an abandoned protective case . . .

Cartels are targeted with terrorist designations

"The case represents the latest effort by the Republican administration to turn up the pressure on cartels through not only indictments of the groups’ leaders but sanctions. The Treasury Department is also bringing economic sanctions against the five defendants as well as the United Cartels as a group and another cartel, Los Viagras.

“ 'We have to pursue these criminals up and down the chain to make sure that the end result doesn’t result in violence and narcotics distribution on our streets,” Galeotti said." . . .More...

Saturday, September 20, 2025

'This Is A Both Sides Issue,' Says Side That Assassinated Charlie Kirk, Shot President Trump, Tried To Assassinate Kavanaugh, . . .

 . . . "Tried To Assassinate Trump Again, Murdered Schoolkids In Minnesota, Shot Steve Scalise, Firebombed Governor Shapiro (cont'd)" . . .

Babylon Bee...parody?


. . . "(cont'd) murdered schoolchildren in Nashville, burned an elderly Jewish woman to death in Colorado, murdered a couple at the Jewish embassy in D.C., seized campus buildings and held janitors hostage, assaulted students on campus who appeared Jewish, ambushed ICE officers in Dallas and shot an officer in the neck, assassinated FBI officer David Underwood, assassinated the United Healthcare CEO, cheered the murder of over 1,200 civilians on October 7th, murdered schoolkids in Colorado in 2019, injured over 700 police offers in 2020 riots, murdered retired police captain David Dorn, murdered a 16-year-old boy in "CHAZ", burned down Minneapolis, firebombed a Washington ICE center, murdered six people in Waukesha, assassinated five Dallas officers in 2016, assassinated three police in Baton Rouge in 2016 (you know what, we're going to stop now, this is getting sad)."

Not in the Neighborhood: Ms. Rachel’s Radical Departure From Mr. Rogers’ Moral Compass

The American Spectator  
"Ms. Rachel’s support for Gaza — at the expense of Israel — is just the latest political entanglement to draw backlash to her YouTube channel. In June 2024, Ms. Rachel celebrated Pride Month on her “Songs for Littles” show, posting a video on the first day of Pride Month."

"Trading Mr. Rogers’ cardigan for Hamas controversy, Ms. Rachel — the YouTube darling of preschoolers whose “Songs for Littles” has garnered more than 14.7 million subscribers — has sparked backlash over what some have claimed to be her promotion of propaganda supportive of Hamas. Platforming Motaz Azaiza, a Palestinian journalist who has been considered by Israeli media as “one of the most identifiable voices with Hamas in the digital arena,” Ms. Rachel posted a short video of herself singing about the “letter M” with “my friend Motaz.” Describing himself as a “genocide survivor,” Azaiza has called for “Palestinian resistance” after the October 7 vicious attack on Jews in Southern Israel.
"Last spring, Ms. Rachel shared content that suggested that Israel was the aggressor in the War, showing photos of emaciated children without noting that, in some cases, these children were suffering from genetic diseases like cystic fibrosis. Last Spring, the StopAntisemitism organization appealed to the American Justice Department to ask U. S. officials to open an investigation into whether Ms. Rachel is serving as a paid propaganda agent. The StopAntisemitism website declares that “Accurso spreads evil propaganda against the State of Israel to more than 20 million followers through multiple accounts, more than the entire population of Jews and Israelis in the world.”
"Earlier this year, Ms. Rachel ignored the Israeli hostages and Jewish children impacted by the October 7 attack and raised $50,000 through Cameo for Gaza’s children, along with the children of Sudan and Ukraine. Later, she posted on Instagram that Israel had violated the Geneva Convention by halting aid when Hamas broke the ceasefire. The truth is that Israel has overseen the transfer of more than 2 million tons of aid into Gaza on more than 107,000 trucks since the War began after October 7.
"While much of her pro-Palestinian rhetoric has been posted on Instagram, Ms. Rachel has also used her “Songs for Littles” YouTube channel to convince children and their parents of Israel’s malign complicity in hurting children. In this heartbreaking video, Ms. Rachel sings one of her viewers’ favorite “songs for littles” with Rahaf, a 3-year-old double amputee from Gaza who had been evacuated for medical treatment by the Palestine Children’s Relief Fund. In an interview with PBS, Ms. Rachel said that the Palestine Children’s Relief Fund reached out to her when they first saw her advocacy for Gaza and asked her to help. “They told me Rahaf loved the show, and then they said, Would you want to meet her and have her on the show? And I said I’d love to … I’m so honored that I could be helpful or I could provide a moment of relief or joy in the midst of genocide.”
"Ms. Rachel shared that Rahaf’s father and two baby brothers are still in Gaza, but they have family FaceTime calls with them. But according to BuzzFeed, the family avoids eating during the FaceTime calls because “the family has so little food” in Gaza. Echoing Hamas’s talking points and relying on data from Hamas’s health ministry, Ms. Rachel has shared that 14,000-15,000 children had been murdered by Israel in Gaza since October 7. These figures have been debunked by Hamas itself, as reported in the Jerusalem Post, which claimed that 70 percent of all of those killed were combat-aged men, not women or children." . . .

What would Mr. Rogers have said?

Stuff Trump Didn't Do

Doug Ross Journal


The cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel’s show doesn’t matter. What matters is the left’s embrace of political violence.

 The Federalist

"What does matter is the left’s embrace of political violence and the left-wing terrorist ecosystem that enables that violence. Right now, it’s the only thing that matters. So that’s what we’re going to talk about, and act upon, until we get the situation under control."

PJ Media

"The national conversation we need to have right now is not about free speech.

"The conversation we need to have is about the normalization of political violence on the left. We need to be talking about left-wing Antifa/trans terrorists gunning down Christians in broad daylight while Democrats and the corporate press justify it and the online left celebrates it.

"That’s the only conversation that matters right now. The manufactured outrage over ABC canceling Jimmy Kimmel’s show is an attempt to change the conversation, to flip the script so that instead of talking about the first major political assassination in America in sixty years, instead of talking about the mainstream left’s embrace of political violence and the institutional ecosystem that foments and funds that violence, we can talk about whether President Trump is using Kirk’s murder as a pretext to crack down on free speech and silence his enemies.

"What nonsense — and what a tell. It speaks volumes that Democrats, liberal media, and online leftists are so desperate to pivot away from talking about Kirk’s assassination that they have chosen to take up the transparently stupid cause of Kimmel’s free speech rights. Remember, these are people who don’t care at all about free speech. Some of those rending their garments this week over Kimmel’s cancellation were the same people who cheered on government censorship during Covid. They love censorship, so long as it’s their side doing the censoring.

"And it hardly needs to be said that nothing about the Kimmel story implicates free speech in any way. Kimmel didn’t just mock MAGA or criticize Kirk, he patently lied about the ideology of Kirk’s alleged assassin, and by allowing his comments to air, ABC arguably violated the terms of its FCC license.

"During his Monday show, Kimmel said this: “The MAGA gang is desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them.”

"Anyone with an internet connection and half a brain cell knows that Kirk’s alleged killer was deeply into Antifa and transgender ideologies, and that he specifically targeted Kirk for speaking out against these things. He was a creature wholly of the left, and to declare otherwise, as Kimmel did, is a deliberate falsification of the facts surrounding the most high-profile political assassination of our time.

"That means Kimmel blatantly violated FCC regulations. Public broadcasters like ABC are prohibited from spreading false information about a crime or catastrophe, and they can lose their licensure if they don’t adhere to the relevant federal regulations.

"No surprise then that Brendan Carr, the FCC chairman, addressed Kimmel’s comments when he went on Benny Johnson’s podcast on Wednesday. “This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do this the easy way or the hard way. " . . .

Murderers of the Land That Bore Them 

. . . "To this end, Charlie Kirk’s politics were purely incidental. The slanders of “racist,” “misogynist,” “transphobe,” and whatever other absurdity they lobbed at the man were simply covers to justify their nihilistic desire to destroy. These are the same people who cheer the murder of children in Christian schools or in Israeli villages, none of whom were anywhere remotely guilty of the slanders with which the left routinely denigrates their opponents. They don't cheer Kirk's murder because they think he was bad. They cheer Kirk's murder because they know he was good.

On paper, these nihilists have little reason to be angry. They are the most privileged people ever produced in the entirety of human history. They have everything, but they are nothing. And maybe that’s the root cause of this…a smug, arrogant attitude that screams through a bullhorn that the universe revolves around them and their feelings. And when this produces not happiness, but its exact opposite, they turn not to humility or reflection or development, but to envy, bitterness, spite, resentment, and hate." . . .

We Need a Post-Kirk Christian Revival and We Need It to Stick

Intellectual Takeout

"But it is not enough to merely make vague condemnations of killing and “hate.” Kirk’s assassination shook people to their core, precisely because it was a political and religious killing. " . . .


"American pews were full the Sunday after the brutal open-air assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. The reminder of the fragile briefness of life and the stark display of evil in the murderous act understandably coaxed many backslidden church-goers back to worship.

"The naysayers believe this won’t stick. It’s up to American pastors to prove them wrong.

" 'If your church refused to mention Charlie this Sunday, it’s time to find a new one,” activist Isabella De Luca wrote on X this past Sunday morning. Dozens of others echoed her.

. . . "Pastors who refuse to speak out against such a public display of evil should not be surprised when their pews return to empty next Sunday. Those who filled the pews this past Sunday did so because the senseless killing they witnessed left them longing for an eternal faith in Kirk’s Heavenly Father.

"A pastor’s words in the pulpit illuminate the antidote which Jesus Christ offers to this darkness. Pastors have an opportunity here to show that all hope is not lost because the Lord, the Comforter of the widow and the orphan, is also a just God who will punish the evildoer.

"But it is not enough to merely make vague condemnations of killing and “hate.” Kirk’s assassination shook people to their core, precisely because it was a political and religious killing. The motivations of the killer, as of this writing, point to a driftless man who was thoroughly marinated in sexually degenerate online communities." . . .

Sarah Wilder is a writer and commentator on culture and the family. Formerly a reporter at the Daily Caller, her work has been published in Chronicles MagazineThe Federalist, and The American Mind.

*Beware if a church becomes political, you can get this.

Politics in the Pulpit; Cal Thomas  . . . "Politicians and preachers should mostly stay in their own lanes. Where Scripture speaks clearly to a contemporary issue, including marriage, gender, abortion and the wisdom found in Proverbs and Ecclesiastes, I'm ready to listen. But don't let me hear who the pastor prefers in the next election. I am not without information and neither is anyone else if they take the time to do research.

"Religious people have an absolute right - indeed the country needs them - to express their views in the public square. Many of our Founders exercised that right and the principles found in the Declaration of Independence and other documents reflected their worldview. And yes, colonial preachers frequently based their sermons on politics, praising or denouncing politicians. But that exception shouldn't create a rule." . . .


Friday, September 19, 2025

Antifa celebrated Charlie Kirk’s murder before panicking over backlash

The Post Millennial Senior Editor Andy Ngo has criticised Antifa for celebrating Charlie Kirk’s murder but stated the group is “quite concerned” with the “anger” at the assassination.   “In the immediate hours in the first two days after the assassination, all of the Antifa all around the world were celebrating, and they were celebrating not just that Mr Kirk was assassinated, but that somebody with his views was killed,” Mr Ngo told Sky News host James Morrow. “They were surprised at the unity in the backlash and anger at what happened … They really thought this would be another killing that would just be either ignored by the media. “They’re quite concerned, and they are discussing ways for how to sabotage the right because they really fear the pendulum changing.”



Daily Signal video; Victor Davis Hanson    "Charlie Kirk’s death ignited a fire within Western civilization, and it is sending a message to the Left: No more.
"It’s been one week since Kirk was shot dead while debating on a college campus, and the Right is reacting more viscerally than we’ve seen from it in recent memory. Not only that, but we’re seeing worldwide support for Kirk, mass demonstrations against illegal immigration in Europe, the fall of France’s government, and a grassroots movement saying, “Enough is enough,” here in America. Victor Davis Hanson analyzes the events that pushed the West to its boiling point and where we go from here on today’s episode of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words.” "“What is this moment? We're seeing it in the United States with thousands of people are commemorating the death of Charlie Kirk. There's no tolerance for the usual left-wing, socialist craziness, the abhorrent violent smears of conservatives who've died. And you don't see major bureaucrats, or generals, or Hollywood figures—increasingly, they're not coming out and rejoicing because they feel that they're going to get a big pushback. “ We also are tired of what I call boutique anti-Americanism. We see Ilhan Omar suggesting that our elected government is worse than the dictatorship in Somalia; or we see AOC calling Donald Trump a fascist, as she has in the past; or we see Rashida Tlaib just demonizing and damning the United States, even though her parents fled the Middle East to come here. And we're tired of it. It doesn't mean we're gonna outlaw free speech or try to use the same tactics as the critics of America do. But what we're saying is, we're a unique place. We're better than the alternative. We don't have to be perfect to be good. So, you can say all you want, but we're gonna not just ignore you, we're gonna do our best to make sure your voices have no influence.” . . .


AOC's Considering 2028 Presidential Run

 JFeed  

"One thing's certain: In a polarized America, her 2028 play could redefine the battle lines, forcing the party to confront its soul or risk implosion."


"Progressive powerhouse Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), the self-styled champion of the far-left "Squad," is stealthily gearing up for a seismic 2028 leap, mulling a audacious White House run or a Senate showdown that could upend Democratic leadership, according to a bombshell Axios report. As the Democratic Party grapples with internal fractures and a quest for identity post-2024, AOC's maneuvers signal her unyielding ambition to reshape American politics, love her or loathe her, she's positioning to dominate the narrative.
Performing for the press
"Sources close to the 35-year-old congresswoman reveal she's quietly building a war machine: Expanding her national footprint with town halls far beyond her Bronx-Queens stronghold, pumping millions into turbocharging her social media empire, and compiling a massive database of potential backers and donors. This isn't casual networking, it's calculated empire-building, with AOC's team dissecting every angle of a presidential primary blitz or a Senate challenge, potentially targeting vulnerable incumbents like Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) or Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.).                                "No official call yet, but the tea leaves are clear: AOC has morphed from a 2018 upset victor – ousting a Democratic establishment dinosaur – into one of the party's most electrifying and divisive figures. Her Green New Deal zealotry, unapologetic socialism, and viral takedowns of corporate titans have amassed a cult-like following among young progressives, while drawing fire from moderates and Republicans who brand her policies as economically reckless and out-of-touch. Critics warn her ascent could splinter Democrats further, handing Republicans easy ammo in a post-Trump era where economic populism clashes with woke agendas." . . .

At JFeed, Israel's story is our story. alive, real, and unfolding every day. Our independent newsroom and live studio bring you breaking news, fearless analysis, and authentic Jewish voices through articles, videos, and on-demand content. Straight from the IDF frontlines, the towns and cities of Israel, and the voices of everyday people. unfiltered and unapologetic. Rooted in Torah values and committed to truth, we deliver trusted reporting and real-time storytelling that strengthens your bond to the Land, the People, and the Jewish spirit. . . .

EntertainmentJUST IN: Dems’ Kimmel Narrative Crumbles As Real Reasons For His Suspension Emerge; September 19, 2025

Trending Politics  

"The outlet reported that Kimmel had plans to address the controversy on his next episode, but his team had run out of time to do a live taping. By then, roughly 66 of the 200 stations where Kimmel would have been broadcast were promised to be offline."


"Hothead Jimmy Kimmel felt he had nothing to apologize for, he told ABC and Disney executives as his media blackout and boycott grew from a rolling snowball into an avalanche.

"Kimmel had just finished mocking MAGA Republicans on his Tuesday night episode when alarm bells went off inside ABC studios. By injecting himself directly into the finger-pointing game between defenders and detractors of Charlie Kirk, Kimmel had put ABC and Disney in the crosshairs of the culture war, they feared.

"Discussions between network executives and Kimmel had not yet reached the desk of Disney CEO Bob Iger, but they were close. Those familiar with the talks say Kimmel was presented with an ultimatum: Apologize for suggesting Tyler Robinson, Kirk’s suspected killer, was a Trump supporter, or face the consequences, which were not yet known to either side.

“ 'We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it,” Kimmel said during the monologue.

"A “social media s**tstorm” quickly followed, an insider said, but then subsided.

"Participants had just enough time to take a breath before Brendan Carr, chair of the Federal Communications Commission, fanned the flames in an interview where he suggested ABC could lose its broadcasting license for airing one-sided political commentary.

"That’s when the storm “became a bigger swirl,” the source told the Hollywood Reporter." . . .