In my opinion, having surrendered to Germany in just over six weeks, the Vichy Nazi puppet ally began rounding up French Jews to send to Nazi death camps has left a stain on France that will not fade. One fears being a gloat today as the American Left (Democrats) will happily turn this nation into Vichy America. TD
Tom Gayler
Millionaire Yachting There are numerous historical problems here, ranging from outright errors to invented details.
1. The date at Kummersdorf is wrong or at least unsupported.
The post claims 14 April 1943 and gives a precise serial number, but there is no well-documented evidence that an M4A1 with that serial was being examined at Kummersdorf on that specific day. German testing of captured Shermans certainly occurred in 1943, but the exact date and circumstances appear to be invented.
2. The engineer "Wanner".
I am not aware of any documented German engineer at Kummersdorf named Wanner who wrote a famous report about a Sherman changing his view of Allied tank design. This reads like historical fiction.
3. "War Daddy the Second".
This is almost certainly fabricated.
"War Daddy" is famous because of the 2014 film Fury, whose Sherman carried that name.
There is no evidence that a Sherman of the 1st Armored Division in Tunisia was named "War Daddy the Second." It looks like the author borrowed a famous fictional name to make the story more engaging.
4. Unit designation.
It should be 3rd Battalion, 1st Armored Regiment, 1st Armored Division, not "Third Battalion, First Armored Regiment, First Armored Division of United States Army." That's not how the U.S. Army designated units.
5. Sidi Bou Zid date is wrong. This is the biggest factual error.
The Battle of Sidi Bou Zid began on 14 February 1943, but:
The German attack began before dawn on 14 February.
The major American armoured counterattacks involving Shermans occurred 15 February, not the morning of the 14th.
The post compresses several days into one.
6. "51 Shermans rolled out by midday." I have never seen a primary source supporting exactly 51 Shermans in that counterattack. It looks like a made-up precision figure.
7. "Most had never heard a tank gun fired in anger." This is dramatic rather than historical. Many soldiers had never been in combat, but that's true of almost every army entering battle for the first time.
8. "Quietly unravel everything the German armored corps believed." This is pure clickbait. German reports on the Sherman were generally favourable regarding:
reliability,
crew ergonomics,
visibility,
radio equipment.
But they did not conclude that it revolutionised their understanding of tank warfare." . . .
