Saturday, May 1, 2010

Malevolent Neglect

 American Thinker  "In America, our insurance companies and hospital groups have a market incentive to provide the best possible care for their customers. As with any capitalist venture, a poorly performing hospital or insurance company will soon find its revenue in a raisin-like condition, leading to both reforms and a subsequent boost in performance, or to Chapter 11 and new ownership. The ObamaCare legislation upsets this balance, weighing heavily on the side of regulatory bureaucracy." Related: ObamaCare: An Unmitigated Disaster "Finally, officials are owning up to what most Americans already knew. ObamaCare means higher costs and lower quality; ObamaCare means rationing and higher taxes - including a Value Added Tax (VAT)."

Yet another socialism success story

American Thinker "Socialism is premised on a faulty view of human nature, and fails every time it is used. Too bad nobody in the press corps has ever asked President Obama what he sees wrong with socialism, if anything. "

Environmentalists Prevent Cleaner Power Plant Construction

Pajamas Media "The truth is that no matter what we do, it’s never enough. Drive a hybrid? No good, it still uses gas. What about electric? No — byproducts of battery construction are toxic. They even put roadblocks in the way of wind farms on the grounds that they use too much land — and might kill birds.
Wind of course has it’s own issues. Kansas currently generates more than a gigawatt of electricity via wind power and is ranked behind only Texas in potential for generating electricity in this fashion."

Does Obama Bear Some Responsibility for Intimidation of Comedy Central?

Pajamas Media " “President Obama’s speech in Cairo projected a vision of American weakness where people think they can make violent threats and get away with it. He does not make strong statements that America will not tolerate these threats, but instead is conciliatory.” President Obama is sending out the wrong signals. Instead of political correctness, there should be statements and actions that make clear the government will protect its citizens’ rights."

Illegal Aliens: Law and Sovereignty in Arizona

Andrew C. McCarthy   "The law is clearly constitutional. Yet the Obama administration, having buried unconsenting Americans under avalanches of debt and inscrutable, unconstitutional mega-statutes, is mulling a court challenge, casting its lot with lawless aliens against besieged Arizonans. A government destructive of our citizens’ basic rights to know, to determine, and to have the protection of the law cannot endure. This one will not. The only question is how much more damage we will allow it to do."

What Arizona Must Live With

Mark Steyn   "I spoke this week to a lady who has a camp of illegals on the edge of her land: She lies awake at night, fearful for her children and alert to strange noises in the yard. President Obama, shooting from his lip, attacked the new law as an offense against “fairness.” Where’s the fairness for this woman’s family? Because her home is in Arizona rather than Hyde Park, Chicago, she’s just supposed to get used to living under siege? Like Gillian Duffy in northern England, this lady has to live there, while the political class that created this situation climbs back into the limo and gets driven far away."

Coulter: I've Never Seen Any Issue Lied About As Much As Ariz. Immigration Law

The Right Scoop 'The problem that’s made reaction explode against this bill, according to Coulter, is simply poor reporting on the actual facts of what the law does and doesn’t do. She accuses almost everyone in the MSM of lying about the bill and perpetuating this anti-immigration law sentiment. '

Have Even ‘Progresssives’ Finally Had It With Keith Olbermann and MSNBC?

Big Journalism "MSNBC is the network of progressives and for progressives. Yet, there is nothing progressive about the network’s employees being terrified to speak up for fear of losing their jobs. Progressives also like to think of themselves as the people who ‘have a heart.’ Thus, there is nothing progressive about making fun of a difficult and terrible experience of youth acknowledged by one who has suffered from the event, even if she happens to be the wife of a former president you don’t like."

Questions I Never Want My Children To Ask

Legal Insurrection "The Tea Parties and voter discontent at the size of government are not driven by racism or fanaticism, as the mainstream media, left-wing bloggers and academics, and Democratic politicians contend. Rather, those of us who oppose destructive Obama administration policies do so because we do not want our children and grandchildren to pay for our mistakes. And we never want our children and grandchildren to ask: "But what did they do to stop it." "

Obama’s Nuclear Naivety

Victor Davis Hanson "This administration has developed a bad habit of talking tough and bullying friendly constitutional states while reaching out to hostile and bad-acting dictatorships. In general, that is unwise foreign policy. In terms of nuclear politics it is dangerous beyond belief."

Silence From U.S. and Its Allies Allowed Iran to Get Seat on U.N. Women’s Rights Body

CNS News "Had one of the Western countries in the chamber – or any other ECOSOC member – protested, a secret ballot vote would have been called for, putting to the test Iran’s ability to win the required majority of at least 28 votes. But the U.S., Canada, Australia and 10 European countries raised no objection, and the meeting elected Iran “by acclamation.” "

States’ Rights (and Wrongs)

Jonah Goldberg  "Forget that when George W. Bush was in office, standing athwart the government was all the rage without conjuring any Confederate demons. Liberals talked about Blue State secession from "Jesusland" with condescending glee. The New York Times ran a love letter to the “states’ rights left” by contributor Jim Holt arguing that “states’ rights has not always been the intellectual property of reactionaries.” But forget all that. Consider that even now there are more than 30 so-called “sanctuary cities” that formally ban their own police from enforcing federal immigration laws or even cooperating with federal officers trying to enforce them. "