Steven Spielberg and the Temple of Obama

 Column: Building the Barack Obama post-presidency, one liberal billionaire at a time

 Washington Free Beacon   "The closest I’ve ever come to glimpsing hell was on Monday, when I read an article in the New York Times headlined, “With High-Profile Help, Obama Plots Life After Presidency.”

"Reporters Michael D. Shear and Gardiner Harris reveal the “methodical effort taking place inside and outside the White House as the president, first lady, and a cadre of top aides map out a post-presidential infrastructure and endowment they estimate could cost as much as $1 billion,” or about as much as Obama fundraised for the 2012 campaign.
"This effort began in November 2012, shortly after his reelection, when the president hosted filmmaker Steven Spielberg at the White House for a screening of Lincoln. President Obama was “spellbound,” the Times reports, as Spielberg held forth “about the use of technology to tell stories.”
Such technology, Spielberg went on, could also be used to tell Obama’s story—to somehow convince future Americans, against all evidence to the contrary, that his presidency was an experience they would like to repeat. “Ideally, one adviser said, a person in Kenya could put on a pair of virtual reality goggles and be transported to Mr. Obama’s 2008 speech on race in Philadelphia.” I’m sure they’ll be banging on the door to get into that exhibit." . . .

As the EPA and IRS Have Shown, with Big Government Comes Little Accountability

Victor Davis Hanson

 

. . . "The Environmental Protection Agency spilled 3 million gallons of toxic sludge into a tributary of the Animas River in Colorado. The stinky yellow flume of old mine waste — rife with cancer-causing mercury and arsenic — threatens to pollute the drinking and recreational water of three states.

"Had a private oil company acted so incompetently and negligently, it would have been fined billions of dollars by the same EPA. The company’s top executives might have been subject to criminal prosecutions. The business’s reputation would have been tarnished for years. Just ask BP officials what the Obama administration did to the corporation after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill of 2010 in the Gulf of Mexico.

"But who will police the green police at the EPA?

"When EPA administrator Gina McCarthy promises that the agency will take “full responsibility,” what does that tired banality mean? Will she resign? Will bureaucrats responsible for the toxic spill face fines and jail sentences? Will residents be able to sue McCarthy and her subordinates for diminishing their quality of life? Will the Sierra Club and the Environmental Defense Fund rush to federal court to file briefs?

"Consider the vast bureaucracy of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Is it culpable for knowingly not enforcing immigration law and thus allowing some undocumented immigrants to commit violent crimes?" . . .

Fascism Is Far Left, Not Far Right on Political Spectrum

Conservative Daily News   "There are many logical incongruities that are maintained on a populist level, especially when it comes to politics. Not least of these is the composition of the political spectrum in identifying ideologies and systems of governance. The most common fallacy is identifying fascism as a right-wing ideology, even though its ideological roots originate in the left-wing extremist models of communism and socialism.

" The most pervasive political spectrum is loosely based on a left/right orientation, and attempts to place political models somewhere along the continuum. But for a political spectrum to have any meaningful representation, it must be based on some set of absolute values. Since every system of governance has unique characteristics, those can hardly be used for the absolute reference points from which to measure.". . .

- See more at: http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2015/08/fascism-is-far-left-not-far-right-on-political-spectrum/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheConservativeDailyNews+%28The+Conservative+Daily+News%29#sthash.zxx2pHsj.dpuf

 

There are many logical incongruities that are maintained on a populist level, especially when it comes to politics. Not least of these is the composition of the political spectrum in identifying ideologies and systems of governance. The most common fallacy is identifying fascism as a right-wing ideology, even though its ideological roots originate in the left-wing extremist models of communism and socialism.
The most pervasive political spectrum is loosely based on a left/right orientation, and attempts to place political models somewhere along the continuum. But for a political spectrum to have any meaningful representation, it must be based on some set of absolute values. Since every system of governance has unique characteristics, those can hardly be used for the absolute reference points from which to measure.
- See more at: http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2015/08/fascism-is-far-left-not-far-right-on-political-spectrum/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheConservativeDailyNews+%28The+Conservative+Daily+News%29#sthash.zxx2pHsj.dpuf

The furthest to the right on the political spectrum, the more individual liberty is advanced. Taken to its extreme is anarchy. When analyzed logically, then, National Socialism and fascism are wholly incongruent philosophically and practically to the right of the spectrum. Those who refer to Nazism as “right-wing” are politically ill-informed and have fallen for Stalin’s tactic of referring to them as such. One scholar makes the point that Nazism is to Communism what Pepsi is to Coke: basically the same but with a little different flavor. - See more at: http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2015/08/fascism-is-far-left-not-far-right-on-political-spectrum/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheConservativeDailyNews+%28The+Conservative+Daily+News%29#sthash.RdBjJSc9.dpuf

 . . . "The furthest to the right on the political spectrum, the more individual liberty is advanced. Taken to its extreme is anarchy. When analyzed logically, then, National Socialism and fascism are wholly incongruent philosophically and practically to the right of the spectrum. Those who refer to Nazism as “right-wing” are politically ill-informed and have fallen for Stalin’s tactic of referring to them as such. One scholar makes the point that Nazism is to Communism what Pepsi is to Coke: basically the same but with a little different flavor." . . .

The furthest to the right on the political spectrum, the more individual liberty is advanced. Taken to its extreme is anarchy. When analyzed logically, then, National Socialism and fascism are wholly incongruent philosophically and practically to the right of the spectrum. Those who refer to Nazism as “right-wing” are politically ill-informed and have fallen for Stalin’s tactic of referring to them as such. One scholar makes the point that Nazism is to Communism what Pepsi is to Coke: basically the same but with a little different flavor. - See more at: http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2015/08/fascism-is-far-left-not-far-right-on-political-spectrum/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheConservativeDailyNews+%28The+Conservative+Daily+News%29#sthash.RdBjJSc9.dpuf

This Is Sick! Elijah Cummings Threatens Planned Parenthood Whistleblowers

Independent Sentinel

“No country can be called free which is governed by an absolute power; and it matters not whether it be an absolute royal power or an absolute legislative power, as the consequences will be the same to the people.”

~ Thomas Paine, Four Letters on Interesting Subjects, 1776

. . . "Where is the outrage from Americans?

"Elijah Cummings actively persecuted Catherine Engelbrecht of True the Vote but she’s fighting back and has sued him at great personal cost. Cummings has tremendous power. He’s the man who insists we need a police czar.

"Cummings has protected government agents who targeted conservatives. He is a statist who would see all power rest with the state. If he were the only member of Congress like that it would be one thing, but there are plenty more just like him.

"Elijah Cummings won’t investigate Hillary Clinton and he protected Lois Lerner. He won’t investigate the former DA in Wisconsin who targeted innocent Americans misusing the John Doe laws. He will, however, investigate political opponents.

"The unlawful selling of baby body parts has been going on for years. There were cases of illicit sales in the 1990’s but no one cared. There was a brief media uproar and then it was over. No one paid a price and the public was apathetic as they are now." . . .

“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in peoples’ minds.” ~ Samuel Adams

"We must awaken the American soul."

The Guardian of the Constitution

John Kasich; I’m fine with abortion; it is the law of the land

RedState

 

"Today in New Hampshire, even as a new video from Center for Medical Progress was circulating which described cutting open the face of a still living baby to extract its brain, John Kasich had this to say about abortion:

“I would like to ask whether you can respect the Roe versus Wade decision, and I ask because as a lifelong libertarian, I’m looking for a candidate to support who is both a fiscal conservative and not a threat to a woman’s right to control her own body,” said a voter at a town hall event in Salem, New Hampshire.

“Obviously, it’s the law of the land now, and we live with the law of the land,” Kasich replied.
"The full answer is a bit more expansive, he added: “It’s the law of the land until it changes.”
"This is straight out of the John Weaver play book. Via CNN:

“I think (abortion) is an important issue, but I think there’s many other issues that are really critical. Early childhood. Infant mortality. The environment. Education,” he said. “I think we focus too much on just one issue, and now that the issue of gay marriage is kind of off the table, we’re kind of down to one social issue.”

"It makes you wonder what kind of a dunderhead could place the environment and education above the life of a child." . . .

Trust But Don't Verify

HopeNChangeCartoons

 

"Obama's Iran deal just keeps getting better and better - assuming, of course, that you're either Iranian or just a rabid anti-Semite who wants to see Israel vaporized on general principle. . .

"How else to explain the recently revealed little detail in "the toughest deal ever made" that says inspection of Iran's Parchin nuclear weapons development site will be handled through the International Atomic Energy Agency, which has agreed to let the Iranians themselves conduct the inspections.

"Unlike most agreements of this sort (which is to say, agreements not negotiated by our ludicrous, Lurch-like, Nobel Prize-chasing Secretary of State) the IAEA experts who would normally conduct investigations and take samples will be barred from visiting the Parchin site, and must instead rely on whatever samples and photos the Iranians decide to give them. Even more astoundingly, the Iranians are already saying that the deal allows them to withhold photos or video of anything being worked on that has military significance.

"So there's Barry's "years in the making" deal in a nutshell: all sanctions on Iran will be lifted immediately, Iran will receive $150 billion with which to buy weapons and deploy terrorists, further billions will roll in from oil sales with which to raise hell, AND they're free to work on nuclear weapons as long as they have military significance." . . .

The immigration swamp

Charles Krauthammer

“This was not a subject that was on anybody’s mind until I brought it up at my announcement.”

— Donald Trump, on immigration, Republican debate, Aug. 6

. . . "But that is not to say that he should be exempt from normal scrutiny or from consideration of the effect of his candidacy on conservatism’s future. If you are a conservative alarmed at the country’s direction and committed to retaking the White House, you should be concerned about what Trump’s ascendancy is doing to the chances of that happening.

"The Democrats’ presumptive candidate is flailing badly. Republicans have an unusually talented field with a good chance of winning back the presidency. Do they really want to be dragged into the swamps — right now, on immigration — that will make that prospect electorally impossible?". . . 

"Even When Announcing His Grave Illness Jimmy Carter Is An Anti-Semitic . . . "

The Lid

 

 . . . "Especially when he started his press conference on Friday revealing that the horrible disease had spread to his brain. Well---that was until a reporter asked him what he would like to see happen before he died, and when he answered the former president slandered the Jewish State (see video below):

In international affairs I would say peace for Israel and its neighbors. That has been a top priority for my foreign policy projects for the last 30 years. Right now I think the prospects of are more dismal than anytime I remember in the last 50 years. Practically, whole process is practically dormant. The government of Israel has no desire for two-state solution, which is policy of all the other nations in the world.

. . .

"William Bradford Smith, Chair of the Division of History, Politics & International Studies at Oglethorpe University in Atlanta once sent a letter to the Jewish Exponent in Philadelphia, which said in part:

Carter's hatred of Israel and, by extension, of all Jews (and make no mistake, if you spend any time in the man's presence, his discomfort at being in the same room with someone who merely appears to be Jewish is palpable), is rooted in the man's megalomania, and his unflinching belief in his own rectitude.

Hillary's Qualifications

"In short, Hillary has no legitimate claim to any high office, either based on her gender or her marriage; as far as her gender is concerned, she is the anti-woman. As far as her marriage is concerned, it is a farce, perpetuated only because of the Clinton’s unrelenting and destructive pursuit of power."

Kenneth Eliasberg   "How did it happen that, in this the land of Washington, Jefferson, Madison et al, someone so fundamentally dishonest and so unbelievably incompetent should not only aspire to be its president, but should actually be taken seriously in this aspiration by one of the country’s two major parties? I cannot recall any presidential contender from either party over the past 60 years as fundamentally undeserving of such a distinction as Hillary Clinton. So let’s just look at the only two things that she is relying on to stake her claim -- her gender and her marriage (i.e. her husband). Aside from the fact that neither should have any bearing on her claim to high office (or, for that matter, any office) in point of fact, neither should have any bearing on her case for both claims are a fraud, i.e. Hillary is neither feminine nor a feminist." . . .Read more

 Hillary Clinton is a complete fraud -- a shameless fraud, and to put her anywhere near the White House again would not only be a travesty, but would put America at risk on many fronts.

This writer has a less optimistic view of Clinton:  ‘Electing’ Hillary Clinton ‘president’ would be like granting satan absolution and giving him the keys to Heaven!

Congress can end birthright citizenship simply by passing a law

Newsmachete  . . . "But contrary to what the media would have you believe, the Constitution doesn't have to be amended to end birthright citizenship.  All it would take would be an act of Congress.

If an illegal alien has a child on American soil, the Constitution does not require the child be granted American citizenship. Congress can give citizenship to anyone it wants, but the Fourteenth Amendment only commands citizenship to persons born on U.S. soil to parents who are not citizens of a foreign country.
Section One of the Fourteenth Amendment begins, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

 Read more:

www.rushlimbaugh.com

The Gold King Mine Fiasco: What It Tells Us About the EPA

Power Line

 "If a private company had been responsible, the EPA would have come down like a hammer. But not this time:"

 "We have written here and here about the EPA-caused spill of three million gallons of toxic liquid into the Animas River in Colorado. Private companies that have caused environmental disasters of that magnitude (or much less) have been criminally prosecuted; in some cases, individuals have been jailed. Will the EPA face similar accountability? Just kidding.

"At Watts Up With That?, Paul Driessen has an excellent update on the Gold King mine disaster. This is what happened:

On August 5, an Environmental Restoration company crew, supervised by US Environmental Protection Agency officials, used an excavator to dig away tons of rock and debris that were blocking the entrance portal of Colorado’s Gold King Mine, which had been largely abandoned since 1923. Water had been seeping into the mine and out of its portal for decades, and the officials knew (or could and should have known) the water was acidic (pH 4.0-4.5), backed up far into the mine, and laced with heavy metals.

But they kept digging – until the greatly weakened dam burst open, unleashing a 3-million-gallon (or more) toxic flood that soon contaminated the Animas and San Juan Rivers, all the way to Lake Powell in Utah. To compound the disaster, EPA then waited an entire day before notifying downstream mayors, health officials, families, farmers, ranchers, fishermen and kayakers that the water they were drinking, using for crops and livestock, or paddling in was contaminated by lead, cadmium, mercury and arsenic.

Full article

inhabitat:  "The EPA just spilled 1 million gallons of mustard-colored mine waste into a Colorado river"