Wednesday, July 18, 2018

Why the Red Hen Is Different from Masterpiece Cakeshop



USSA News  "My good friend David Blankenhorn is one of the most admirable people I know, a man who has worked to strengthen the American polity and nurture social peace and progress. I have eagerly followed his work and participated in some of his projects. But there is one subject upon which we disagree sharply: religious liberty.

" 'David looks at the furor over the Red Hen denying service to Sarah Huckabee Sanders and compares it to Jack Phillips’s decision not to make a cake for a gay wedding. As a social media participant, I saw many folks make the same comparison going in both directions: Those who favored Jack Phillips complained about the hypocrisy of secular liberals cheering on the Red Hen; those who favored the Red Hen castigated the lack of consistency they saw in the views of those who supported Jack Phillips.
" 'In my view, being in business doesn’t mean that we throw out all of our convictions to become soulless creatures of commerce. If freedom means anything, it means freedom to choose the way we meld our deepest beliefs with the lives we lead among many others of diverse views. But to say that is, of course, to be forced to deal with the problem of Southern segregation—and indeed, facing that problem is key here because civil rights and gay rights are generally construed as being in the same category of rights unjustly denied.
" 'But we need to carefully distinguish Southern segregation from controversies such as the Red Hen and Masterpiece Cakeshop. Segregation wasn’t something that individual merchants dreamed up as a system. It was public policy. Given the power of that system and its ruthless implementation, one should not be surprised that it required the sweeping action of a larger entity, the Federal government, to take it down. Social bias against homosexuality of course has existed for a very long time, and there were legal ramifications to the bias; but homosexuals did not face anything comparable legally to the vast, diabolical system of segregation. It should be clear, then, that such a plan of reform to end segregation is not a suitable template for application to our many social disagreements. It would be one thing if we lived in a nation of government-backed Republican or Democratic restaurants and hotels, or if Christians were attempting to impose some kind of gay apartheid. But neither of those things is even remotely true. Just as some Jews have recently complained that comparing Donald Trump’s policies to the Holocaust mocks and cheapens the tragedies their people suffered, we could say the same of generalizing the Red Hen and Masterpiece Cakeshop in any way to compare them with Southern segregation." . . .

No comments: