Friday, December 6, 2024

The dark reason why Justice Gorsuch was dead silent during arguments in most high-profile case…

 Revolver News 

The bottom line now is that Justice Gorsuch has a chance to correct the course and stand up for what’s right. Let’s hope he seizes this moment to protect America’s most vulnerable—our children. They deserve better than to be sacrificed as little pawns in the left’s twisted and perverted ideological war.


 "We get it—judges are human. They’re not perfect, and sometimes, they mess up. But every once in a while, a mistake is so massive, so destructive, that it leaves you sitting there in utter disbelief.

"That’s exactly what happened with a case Justice Neil Gorsuch got completely wrong. At the time, it might have seemed like just another ruling, but looking back, it’s downright bone chilling. Little did he know that very decision would become a weapon for the left—a legal machine gun used to shoot their warped trans agenda into the hearts and minds of innocent and vulnerable kids.

"It’s no wonder Justice Gorsuch was dead silent today when a major case landed before the court. The case, US v. Skrmetti, tackles the constitutionality of a state ban on so-called “gender-affirming” care for minors.

"But here’s the kicker—this high-profile case ties directly back to the infamous 2020 ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County. That’s the case Gorsuch totally fumbled, even going so far as to author the court’s majority opinion. It was that decision that handed the Biden regime the keys to kick open the door for their ghoulish kids’ trans agenda.

"Maybe, just maybe, as Justice Gorsuch sat there in silence today, he wasn’t pondering the case in front of him—while also being haunted by the ripple effects of his 2020 misstep.

"Sarah Parshall Perry:

Justice Gorsuch remained entirely silent throughout oral arguments at #SCOTUS today in the Court’s most high-profile case, U.S. v. Skrmetti. That case concerns the constitutionality of a state ban on so-called gender-affirming care for minors under the age of 18.

My thought?

The justice is reckoning with the ghost of Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) in which he authored the majority opinion for the Court that held under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, employment discrimination prohibitions based on “sex” also included “gender identity.”

From that decision, a host of ills was born. The Biden administration has used Bostock to expand gender identitarianism in healthcare, education, housing, & more.

Today, the rent came due.

No comments: