"What about the farce of impeaching Obama after he is out of office? Yes, it is a farce, but it was a farce when Congress did so with impeachment #2 against Trump. It makes no difference that Obama has been out of office longer."
"There has been at least a temporary setback to indicting James Comey on making a false statement to Congress and obstructing a congressional investigation. This, combined with liberal judges running continual interference in such cases, the thorny five-year statute of limitations, and the media constantly portraying any prosecutorial action taken against the seditious actors as a personal vendetta by Donald Trump against his political enemies, is leaving many of us with the uneasy feeling (if we didn’t already have it) that no one will pay for trying to set up and bring down the leader of the opposition party and president of the United States.
"The evidence that has trickled out proves beyond a shadow of doubt that, far from doing everything “by the book,” or merely ignoring “See Something, Say Something,” Barack Obama was actually directing the Trump-Russia collusion plot. Count me among those who think he’ll never see a jail cell for it, for a number of reasons: The crime doesn’t exactly fit the technical definition of treason or sedition; statute of limitations; he still has supporters in DOJ who will run interference for him; he’s The One.
"Rather than let him and the others skate, here’s an idea: Let Congress impeach Obama, just as the Democrats did to Donald Trump after he was out of office. The purpose would be to embarrass him and expose his treachery to the masses, to the point that even the MSM will have trouble hiding it.
"What do they charge him with? Policy “inconsistent with consensus views of the interagency.” Do those words sound familiar? That was Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman’s testimony about Trump leading to Trump impeachment #1. When Vindman first said those words, I instantly thought three things:
1) Yes, that’s exactly why we elected Trump.
2) Trump’s the commander-in-chief, and there’s nothing wrong with that.
3) Vindman’s use of an adjective [interagency] as a noun was annoying, not endearing the way a different Alexander — Haig — a former general, made nouns into verbs as Ronald Reagan’s secretary of state. More
No comments:
Post a Comment