Sunday, August 30, 2026

Elizabeth Warren Proves Once Again That She Has No Idea How Basic Economics Works

 "But because Elizabeth Warren has never had a real job and has no idea how to work in the real world, she thinks dynamic pricing is a bad thing, and she wants to make the companies that provide us with goods and services the bad guy in all of this." Amy Curtis

Elizabeth Warren Proves Once Again That She Has No Idea How Basic Economics Works  "It's a fairly good rule of thumb that if Elizabeth Warren is against something, it's probably a good thing that you should support. Or, at the very least, it reveals just how ignorant she is about how our supply-and-demand economy actually works.
"She's now waging a war against "dynamic pricing," which she claims is how "giant companies ... squeeze you even more." . . .

Elizabeth Warren's Economic Plan: Break and Remake  . . . "Warren supported a single-payer "Medicare for All" healthcare system, while Trump sought to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA) with an alternative plan. She proposed a wealth tax targeting the wealthiest individuals and higher taxes on high-income earners, aiming to redistribute wealth and increase funding for social programs. Trump meanwhile pursued tax cuts, particularly for corporations and high-income individuals, to stimulate economic growth.

Warren emphasized the need for stricter regulation of Wall Street and the financial industry, while Trump pursued deregulation and rolled back certain regulations. Warren also supported a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and comprehensive immigration reform, while Trump focused on tightening immigration controls, border security measures, and travel bans on predominantly Muslim countries. Warren emphasized a multilateral approach to foreign policy, criticized Trump's "America First" approach, and sought to restore U.S. global leadership.20

Dolly Parton Shut Down ABC’s Attempt To Get Her To Attack Trump

 Trending Politics  

"The resurfaced clip offers a contrast to the celebrity political culture that followed, where actors, musicians and athletes increasingly became fixtures in political campaigns and partisan debates. Parton’s response also contained a lesson that many entertainers have learned the hard way."


"An old interview featuring country music legend Dolly Parton is drawing attention, showing how the famously apolitical entertainer handled an attempt to pull her into a political fight over President Donald Trump.

The exchange dates back to 2018, when Parton sat down with ABC News and was pressed about Trump and controversial comments he had made before entering the White House. Rather than take the bait, Parton made it clear from the beginning that she had no interest in using her celebrity status to tell Americans what they should think politically.

“I just don’t get into that,” Parton said. “And so if you are deciding you may want to ask me something more serious, don’t, because I’m not going to answer it,” she said.

The interviewer nevertheless continued, bringing up Trump and comments captured on the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape that surfaced during the 2016 presidential campaign.

“You have a president of the United States who said those things on that bus,” the interviewer said.

"Parton refused to budge.

"'I’m not addressing that. I do not get into that,” she responded. “Of course, I have my opinion about everybody and everything. But I learned a long time ago, keep your damn mouth shut if you want to stay in show business.”

"The remark summed up an approach that became increasingly uncommon as celebrities and entertainers waded deeper into partisan politics during the Trump era." . . .More...

Kamala Humiliated After Prominent Dem Says She Shouldn't Run In 2028

 Trending Politics  

"Despite Sand’s opposition, multiple national polls of a potential 2028 Democratic presidential primary conducted in the months leading up to and around late August have shown Harris receiving the highest share of support among named potential candidates." 


"In a recent interview with Politico, Iowa Democratic Party gubernatorial nominee Rob Sand definitively pushed back on the idea of former Vice President Kamala Harris running for president once again.

"Sand, who has saved as Iowa’s state auditor since 2019, has attempted to portray himself as a “moderate” while attempting to become the first Democrat to win a gubernatorial election in the state since 2011. He faces Republican businessman Zach Lahn in the race to succeed outgoing Republican Governor Kim Reynolds.

"While speaking with Politico’s Jonathan Martin at the Iowa State Fair, Sand was asked whether he would be interested in the idea of former President Joe Biden coming to campaign with him. “No. Can he even do that right now?” Sand replied.

"His answer was similar when he was asked about the prospect of Harris campaigning with him as well. “No thanks. Let’s move on. We need some new leadership.” Martin then asked, “You don’t think Harris should run in 2028?” Martin added, to which Sand replied with a definitive “no.”

"Martin followed up by asking Sand’s view on the best option for Democrats in 2028, including whether a governor or someone not from Washington, D.C., should be the nominee. “You got my gut reaction on a couple. I don’t know what the answer to that is. I got an election in 75 days. We just had news this week about this cancer vaccine for skin cancer, and my opponent wants to ban vaccines like that. I’m pretty focused on what we’ve got going on right here in Iowa. Those are conversations for down the road,” Sand responded.".... More...