Jennifer Rubin "The mainstream media assume that, if Hillary Clinton wants the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination, all she need do is give an imperial wave, accept the crown and then begin her effortless procession to the White House. Perhaps. The same was said before the 2008 election. Now Clinton has a foreign-policy record, which political reporters unschooled in the issues and too nervous to dissect accurately (she’s going to be president, don’t you know) would have us believe is positive. Rubbish.
"Here are her top 10 disasters:" Full article here.
The above article is linked to by Alan Caruba in his commentary, Hillary's Burdens. Mr. Caruba sums up his argument against a Hillary presidency with this assessment:
A Hillary presidency is likely to be an extension of the Obama presidency and that has not served the nation well. The huge national debt is beginning to penetrate the dull minds of liberals, the “sequester” has generated many news articles and reports about the government’s enormous waste of taxpayer dollars. Rising prices of everything are affecting Americans, no matter their political orientation. Foreign policy will be affected by events in the Middle East and elsewhere. None of this bodes well for a Hillary run for the presidency.
So Hillary, if she would run for the Democratic Party nomination, would do so with an enormous amount of political “baggage.”
If she is elected, do you really want your daughter to apply for that White House internship? Just asking.