Tuesday, August 26, 2025

"Gavin Newsom Hates Californians, But He Sure Loves The Limelight"

  Issues & Insights  

"The only thing more astounding than Newsom’s disastrous tenure as governor is the fact that more than half of adults in the state approve of the job he’s been doing, and that he’s a serious contender among Democrats to run for president."


"There are two things you can be sure of when it comes to Gavin Newsom. One is that he craves power. Two, he hates his fellow Californians.

"OK, the second one might be a stretch. But considering what he’s done to the people of his home state, that’s a fairly reasonable conclusion to draw.

"Newsom has been making headlines these days by “getting tough” with President Donald Trump in ways childish (X with posts written in all caps) and politically poisonous (promising to redraw district boundaries to kill off four or five of the state’s nine Republican seats).

"With that latter move, Newsom once again shows his disdain for Californians, who voted twice – in 2008 and again in 2010 – against gerrymandering of this kind, appointing a bipartisan commission to draw district lines that are fair and equitable. Polls show most California voters oppose Newsom’s scheme to bypass this commission, but Newsom clearly hopes to bypass voters with an (expensive) special election that will attract mainly hard-core partisans.

"But this is hardly the worst of Newsom’s offenses against the people he governs.

"Since Newsom took the helm in 2019 and spent the next six years grooming himself for the presidency, the people of California have suffered.

"Some examples:" . . .This is just one; read more here...

. . . "Newsom spent years attacking oil companies to appease climate alarmists. As Politico noted:

He announced a ban on fracking in 2021 and signed a law that restricts oil drilling near sensitive sites like schools and hospitals. He also spearheaded a lawsuit to hold major oil companies liable for climate change damages and legislation to consider a cap on oil industry profits, while castigating the industry as a corrupt force fleecing Californians.

Now, California drivers face the possibility of gas prices topping $8 a gallon as two oil refineries in the state plan to shut down, and Newsom is scrambling to figure out how to undo the damage he’s caused."

What Made the Democratic Party Go Crazy?

Victor Davis Hanson   

Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were the last Democrats to go through the motions of appealing to the middle class. But in retirement, they both cashed in, went global, and became multimillionaires by selling their name and brand—and so joined the madness. 

"The answer was not Trump alone.

"Indeed, irony abounds when Democrats resonate with the claims of the vestigial Never Trumpers that the MAGA movement “hijacked” the Republican Party.

"In characteristic projectionist fashion, the left is simply falsely attributing to their opposition the very hijacking that hit the Democratic Party.

"The Republicans are still the party of conservatism and traditionalism. But in the last decade, it adopted an expansionary middle-class agenda that has led to record party registration, its first popular presidential vote victory since 2004, and control of all three branches of government.

"The MAGA emphases also have accomplished what prior “moderate” Republican presidents and presidential candidates had sought but largely failed to achieve: making inroads with minorities and youth and substituting class commonalities for racial chauvinism.

" 'Thus, in 2024, 55 percent of Hispanic men and somewhere around 25 percent of black males voted for Trump—along with a +2 advantage for Trump among young men in general (18-29).

"In contrast, Joe Biden left office with below 40 percent popularity in many polls. His replacement, 2024 Democratic nominee Kamala Harris, despite a substantial advantage in funding and overwhelmingly biased, favorable media coverage, lost both the popular and Electoral College vote.

"Since the election, a variety of data points show a steady erosion in Democrat Party favorability (24 percent positive polling) and voter registration (for the first time in memory, Republicans are out-registering hemorrhaging Democrats in new voter affiliations).

"They are also on the losing end of a 40/60 split among voters on most issues—especially the border, energy, crime, transgenderism, and foreign policy—a truth that even the legacy media cannot disguise.

"The Democratic implosion does not necessarily mean they will not win back the House in the next election. Historically, it is difficult for even an unpopular out-party not to pick up lots of House and Senate seats in an administration’s first midterm. But if Democrats capture at least the House, the vote will not be for their party’s policies or politicians as much as a reflection of their ginned-up opposition to Trump, the messenger of a radical and controversial counterrevolutionary message.

"The Democratic project is bleeding out because it either does not address what the middle class is worried about, or it offers no solution to popular anger—namely over inflation, the out-of-control DEI commissariat, illegal immigration, crime, high energy prices and tyrannical Green New Deal policies, steep interest rates, unaffordable housing costs, and anemic foreign policies." . . .   More...

Karma Comes Calling for John Bolton

The American Spectator   

"Apparently, without giving any thought to the possibility that Bolton might have committed a serious crime, they adopted the same moronic “retribution” narrative peddled by the crack reporters at Slate and Salon:" . . .

Rich Terrell

"On August 8, 2022 about 30 FBI agents descended on Donald Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago and searched the place with less civility than they would have afforded a Miami drug lord. They spent most of that day rummaging through Trump’s personal belongings — and those of his wife and son — allegedly in search of classified documents. This was the first time in American history that such an outrage had been committed against any former president. Yet it was greeted with thinly disguised glee by Trump’s critics, including erstwhile National Security Advisor John Bolton.
"Friday morning at 7 a.m., Bolton learned what it feels like to have the FBI appear at one’s front door with a search warrant. Later that day, federal agents also searched his D.C. office. According to a report in the New York Post, a senior U.S. official said the FBI is investigating Bolton’s use of a private email to send national security documents to family members. This official alleged, “While Bolton was a national security adviser, he was literally stealing classified information, utilizing his family as a cutout.” This is a profoundly ironic development considering Bolton’s frequent and caustic public comments about President Trump and the Mar-a-Lago raid.
"After that event, Bolton appeared on MSNBC to inveigh against Trump and his attitude concerning classified material: “I don’t think he cared about the classification system, I don’t think he appreciated the sensitivity of this information.” Oddly enough, he was utterly unconcerned about the dangerous precedent set by an FBI raid on a former president’s home: “It’s important that everybody take a deep breath here. This is a very serious matter. And it would be better if we could let the legal process play out.” It did “play out,” of course, when federal judge Aileen M. Cannon  dismissed the classified documents case against Trump.
"Inevitably the corporate news media have reacted quite differently to the Mar-a-Lago and Bolton raids. In the former case the major outlets often refused to call it a “raid.” The Washington Post, for example, ran countless pieces like this one in which the FBI “search” of Trump’s home was characterized as relatively routine: “It’s important to note that there is no reason to think the FBI’s action was triggered by politics.” On the other hand, the Post’s editorial about the bureau’s surprise visit to Bolton’s house uses the “R” word in its headline: “FBI raid targeting Bolton crosses a line in the Trump revenge campaign.” It goes downhill from there:" . . . More...

Rep. Eric Swalwell Threatens To Doxx Masked ICE Agents If Dems Regain House

 Legal Insurrection 

 "He knows he would be putting ICE Agents and their families in mortal danger if he does what he threatens to do. He doesn’t care."
 

. . . "On August 16, 2025, Swalwell threatened that if Democrats regain control of the House in 2026, they will “unmask” ICE agents who wear masks to conceal their identities to protect them from from gangs and antifa-types.

I want this to be absolutely clear — these masked men — roaming around like bank robber bandits — will be unmasked in a Democratic majority. Literally and figuratively. There will be accountability for the terror they’ve brought to our communities.

It’s all coming out.

"You hear that, ICE agents? If Democrats come back to power they will dox you so cartels can go after your families and try to put you in prison. https://t.co/3i5mqfqneK pic.twitter.com/Ka7SRyXKXe" . . .  More...

From the comments to this post: 

He made these statements outside the Well of the House. No speech and debate clause protection. When the House reconvenes the Speaker should put forth a censure motion for Swallows Well. Once passed he should be stripped of all committee assignments. The only way to stop this type of abhorrent behavior is to punish it to the maximum allowed by House rules.

Counterpoint:

  Not true. This is not Westminster; the speech and debate clause extends to anything a congressman does in the course of his role as a legislator, and it also extends to his staffers.


Monday, August 25, 2025

Facing up to Black Crime in America

We owe it to every victim, in every community, to stop pretending reality doesn’t exist. Truth isn’t racist. Statistics aren’t bigoted.

The American Spectator 

"That doesn’t mean blackness equals criminality, and it doesn’t excuse crude stereotypes. But it does expose the flaw in the narrative that poverty or inequality alone explains crime. Something deeper, something cultural, institutional, and uncomfortable, is at play. Until we admit this, we’ll keep watching the same cycle of violence repeat." 

"A woman named Holly from Cincinnati was recently knocked unconscious by a sucker punch at a jazz festival. The attack was caught on video. I had the misfortune of watching it. Perhaps you did too. The video went viral

"And for once, maybe the first time in decades, a white victim of black violence spoke honestly about what happened to her. She called it racially motivated. She didn’t apologize for existing. She didn’t beg people not to notice patterns. This represents a seismic shift in American discourse. For 60 years, we’ve been trapped in a suffocating ritual where white victims must immediately genuflect before the altar of racial sensitivity, even as they’re being wheeled into ambulances. They apologize for their attackers. They beg the media not to mention race. They perform elaborate acts of contrition for crimes committed against them.

"The script is always identical: “I don’t want this to become about race.” “They were probably just having a bad day.” “This could have happened to anyone.” What look like organic responses from trauma victims are often coached performances designed to protect a narrative that’s destroying lives.

"It’s time to face a simple truth: discussing black-on-white crime isn’t racism. It’s reality, and reality doesn’t bend to our feelings or our carefully crafted fairytales. Black-on-white crime exists. In fact, according to National Crime Victimization Survey, blacks commit 85 percent of all non-lethal interracial violence between blacks and whites.

"Let me be absolutely clear. This isn’t about defending one race or condemning another. It’s about the lives of Americans — black, white, and every shade between — who are left to live with the consequences. Crime that cuts across every racial line exists. If we treat the problem as taboo, we stay silent while the damage spreads.

"The numbers tell a story that makes many people deeply uncomfortable. Violent crime is not evenly distributed across America. Certain communities commit violent offenses at rates dramatically higher than others. The standard deflections don’t hold water anymore. “It’s about poverty,” we’re told. But poverty alone can’t explain why some of the poorest regions in the United States aren’t the most violent. Appalachia, for instance, is home to some of the most economically deprived white communities in the country. Yet violent crime rates there remain far lower than in cities like St. Louis, Baltimore, or Detroit. Poor whites, poor Asians, and poor Hispanics live with the same lack of money. They live with the same struggles with addiction, the same crumbling schools. But they don’t commit violent crimes at anywhere near the same rates.

" 'It’s about inequality,” we’re told. Yet America is filled with ethnic groups who arrived with nothing and endured discrimination without turning to thuggery. One needn’t discount blacks’ unique history of subjugation in the U.S. to recognize that immigrants from East Asia, South Asia, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe all faced bigotry and barriers. Many began in low-wage jobs, struggling with broken English, packed into unsafe neighborhoods where survival itself was a daily battle. But these communities didn’t become epicenters of violent crime. They endured, they built. They climbed, without turning their streets into warzones." . . .More...

Why Won't Politicians Stop Dropping the F-bomb?

 Ian Haworth  

"At this point, all they have left is "f—- Trump." Nothing of substance, nothing of character, nothing based in adult reality."

"There was a time when political rhetoric had at least the vague appearance of dignity, while our elected officials focused on kissing babies, pretending to enjoy gas station burritos and using language best suited for a mild-mannered sermon on Sunday morning. Politicians — love them or hate them — at least tried to speak in ways that aimed to inspire or persuade.

"Today? That's been replaced with a lazy, foul-mouthed shortcut, where the F-bomb is being dropped like there's no tomorrow. Celebrities and politicians alike have discovered what they think is a magic tool — drop the F-bomb, cue the applause and watch the social media clips go viral. From podiums in Congress to late-night TV, it's become almost routine.

" 'No f—-ing way," Sen. Chuck Schumer announced in response to Donald Trump's attempt to restore law and order to Washington, D.C. "Who cares about the f—-ing rules right now," declared professional-failure Beto O'Rourke, "Win some f—-ing power." "Yep. When ICE is around, I will alert my community to stay out of the area, and I'm not f—-ing scared of you nor Trump's masked goons," posted an Arizona state senator.

"Even outgoing so-called late-night "comedian" Stephen Colbert got in on the act: "How dare you, sir? Would an untalented man be able to compose the following satirical witticism? Go f—- yourself."

"I guess we'll never know why Stephen Colbert got fired ...

"Make no mistake: As a Brit, I'm not unaccustomed to using the odd four-letter one-syllable word to hammer my point home. But there are a few crucial differences. First, it's just funnier in a British accent. Second, I'm not a member of Congress, nor am I standing at the forefront of the anti-Trump "return to civility" nonsense that supposedly formed the foundation of the post-Obama Democratic Party!

"In this case, the problem isn't even that these F-bombs are crude or beneath the office of our elected officials. The real problem is that these people think this is what connects them to "the people" they are obsessively trying to woo.

"Somehow, they genuinely believe that being vulgar makes them authentic. In reality, it's quite the opposite. At this point, all they have left is "f—- Trump." Nothing of substance, nothing of character, nothing based in adult reality. It's just low-IQ political Mad Libs: fill in your outrage with profanity, get a round of clapter and carry on with the same vacuous talking points." . . .

More...    Ian Haworth is a political commentator known for using facts, logic and a hint of British humor to fight for true conservative values. A speaker with Young America's Foundation and Turning Point USA, he first moved to the United States from the United Kingdom after graduating from Oxford University with a bachelor’s and master’s degree in computer science. While working at Facebook as a software engineer on their misinformation team, Ian started to speak out against anti-conservative bias in Silicon Valley, as well as the rise of antisemitism.

Why the Cracker Barrel Logo Matters

 American Greatness

Rich Terrell toon added by TD

"One of the unique and pleasant aspects of writing for American Greatness is that it allows its columnists to compose the titles/headlines that appear above their columns. Most publications don’t do that. A copy editor writes the headline and slaps it on the piece, sometimes with unintended results. Readers tend to judge a column by its title even more than they judge a book by its cover—and the latter is the cliché of all clichés for a reason. I can’t tell you the number of times over the years that I’ve seen readers upset with a columnist (or even a reporter) about something he didn’t write and over which he had no control, all because a copy editor got creative or tried to be clever or took too many liberties with the content of a column. That’s not usually a problem here at American Greatness.
"I point this out today for a reason, namely, because I’m going to need you to bear with me for a second. I wrote the headline/title on this column, and so, I know what it says. I also know that what you’re about to read may seem to contradict that headline. Actually, it contradicts the headline directly. But as I say, hang with me for a bit.
"So, the new Cracker Barrel logo redesign is irrelevant. It doesn’t matter. Sure, the new logo is bland. It’s uninteresting. It disconnects the company from its history. And it was almost certainly the result of a collaboration between unimaginative Cracker Barrel executives who are disengaged from their company’s customer base and equally unimaginative outside consultants who have probably never eaten at one of the restaurants, much less talked to its patrons. The redesign will appeal to few, if any, and will do nothing to help the company. But then…so what? It’s just a logo, after all. Who cares? In the grand scheme of things, it’s hardly worth the outrage. If it hadn’t been pointed out on social media, and if a handful of conservative influencers hadn’t stirred up indignation over the change, 99.99% of Americans never would have noticed it, and even those who did wouldn’t have allowed it to raise their blood pressure. The bottom line is that in and of itself, the Cracker Barrel logo redesign is a non-story. The very idea that anyone should care about it is just more “boob bait for Bubbas,” as the late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan used to say about overhyped Clinton scandals." ... More...

Comment to the above: "I love Cracker Barrel’s(sp) and its menu. What I noticed is the work ethic. If you get there when they first open in the morning and it’s not too busy you might try to converse with some of the employees. I do. Ask them how long they have been working there. Many have worked for over a decade. They like their jobs which means the company, at least at mid-level, is doing something right."

MSNBC makes a doomed, woke rebrand

Mike McDaniel 
So, MSNBC is now MS NOW! It’s the same lunatic leftist talking heads pushing the same “Trump is Hitler, a dictator and he’s destroying 'our democracy,'” hair on fire hysteria that caused viewers and NBC to dump them.

"In the last several years, rebranding has turned formerly successful businesses into wrecks. Woke executives who hadn’t a clue about their company’s customers tried to improve what wasn’t broken and it blew up in their faces. Budweiser lost billions. So did Target, and Cracker Barrel—Cracker Barrel?!—has leapt off the cliff into the bottomless DEI pit. No one yet knows what Jaguar intended with its bizarre commercial featuring colorful but blank faced mutants of ambiguous gender, cavorting and wielding a sledgehammer without a car in sight. On X, Elon Musk quickly asked whether Jaguar had anything to do with cars. Jaguar replied “yes,” but has produced nothing to support that contention. Jaguar compounded that disaster by announcing it is going all-electric as the planet-wide electric vehicle doom loop is closing, probably for good, leaving Jaguar dealers with nothing to sell in the meantime.

"MSNBC, commonly known as MSDNC, has always been painfully woke. During its glory days it paid Rachel Maddow an obscene salary for a single weekly pro-Democrat/Harris, anti-Trump/America rant. Immediately after Trump’s reelection, things went from bad to worse:  

MSNBC’s ratings have tanked 54% in the days after President-elect Donald Trump’s victory over Vice President Kamala Harris — a win that left MSNBC’s staunchly anti-Trump hosts speechless.

The ratings are down 40% from this time last year, according to Nielsen data.

"Maddow reportedly lost at least $5 million in yearly salary, and was forced to do more than one weekly rant virtually no one was watching. The future looked grim:" . . . More...

 NBC Finalizes Divorce Proceedings As MSNBC Rebrands To MS NOW

"Maddow, who was initially popular, was one of the primary hawkers of the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax. She assured her viewers the walls were closing in on Trump any minute, really, no kidding, any minute now, probably right after this commercial, so stay tuned. And viewers did, until Trump was reelected and viewers who believed Maddow were stunned. So stunned they stayed stunned and tuned Maddow out."


France Summons U.S. Envoy After Rebuke of Macron: ‘Palestinian State Push Rewards Hamas, Endangers Jews

Would this be the same France that surrendered meekly to Hitler in 1940 and took an active part in sending their own Jewish citizens to Polish Nazi concentration camps to be killed? TD

How France’s Vichy Regime Became Hitler’s Willing Collaborators

Breitbart 

The ambassador’s letter suggests Washington intends to make protection of Jewish communities a central element of its diplomatic pressure on European allies. 

 "France summoned U.S. Ambassador Charles Kushner on Sunday after he published a scathing open letter in the Wall Street Journal to President Emmanuel Macron, accusing the French government of failing to adequately combat rising antisemitism and warning that “public statements haranguing Israel embolden extremists.”

"The diplomatic confrontation escalates tensions between Washington and Paris over France’s approach to Jewish safety and Middle East policy, with Kushner’s Wall Street Journal letter — dated Monday, August 25, but released to the press late Sunday afternoon — marking an extraordinary public rebuke from a sitting U.S. envoy to his host nation’s leader ...

... "The ambassador painted a grim picture of French Jewish life, declaring that “antisemitism has long scarred French life, but it has exploded since Hamas’s barbaric assault on Oct. 7, 2023.” He continued: “In France, not a day passes without Jews assaulted in the street, synagogues or schools defaced, or Jewish-owned businesses vandalized. Your own Interior Ministry has reported antisemitic incidents even at preschools.”

Kushner then delivered his most pointed criticism of Macron’s Middle East policy: “Public statements haranguing Israel and gestures toward recognition of a Palestinian state embolden extremists, fuel violence, and endanger Jewish life in France. In today’s world, anti-Zionism is antisemitism—plain and simple.”

Drawing on his personal connection to President Donald Trump, Kushner wrote: “President Trump and I have Jewish children and share Jewish grandchildren. I know how he feels about antisemitism, as do all Americans.” He detailed Trump’s current aggressive anti-antisemitism measures: “He directed the Education Department to enforce civil-rights protections for Jewish students on university campuses, making clear that harassment and discrimination won’t be tolerated.”

The letter outlined additional Trump administration actions: “He expanded resources for the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Homeland Security to safeguard synagogues and Jewish schools. He ordered strict vetting to bar entry for foreigners espousing antisemitic hatred and revoked visas for foreign agitators. He oversaw the deportation of Hamas sympathizers and cut funding to organizations promoting antisemitic incitement.” . . .

DEI harms black women; Biden's appointments were horrible and cast shade on worthy black women

Don Surber

"50 years later, we are stuck with these nincompoops. And their moral turpitude makes it much harder for people like Carol Swain and Winsome Earle-Sears to maintain credibility."


"Biden picked Kamala Harris as vice president because she was a black woman.
"Biden picked Ketanji Brown Jackson as a Supreme Court justice because she was a black woman.
"Biden picked Lisa Cook as a Federal Reserve governor because she was a black woman.
"Those are his words, not mine. He picked tokens who had two qualities besides their skin color and sex: 1. They had to be socialists (the kinder, gentler communists) and 2. they had to be dumber than him.
"Cook is in trouble because she lied on her mortgage application and she is a plagiarist. PhD now stands for Plagiarized Her Diploma.
"President Trump wants her to resign from the Federal Reserve.
"But liberals are banking on her skin color and sex shielding her from the consequences of her own dishonesty. Smart money is on her surviving in a nation saturated by white guilt.
Lisa Cook, Who Broke Ground at the Fed, Faces Attack by Trump
The first black woman to serve on the Federal Reserve board, Ms. Cook has long been a pathbreaker in a field dominated by white men.
"NYT has gone full Louis Farrakhan in calling my race white devils.
"The reason white men dominate economics is black women are not taking classes that involve math. The American Association of University Women reported:
The top majors of Black students include: health and medical administration services (21%); human services and community organization (20%); social work (19%); public administration (17%); criminal justice and fire protection (15%); sociology (14%); computer and information systems (14%); human resources and personnel management (14%); interdisciplinary social sciences (13%); and pre-law and legal studies (13%). . . .">From Karen Bass in LA to Michelle Wu in Boston, first women of color make terrible mayors. The feds recently indicted New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell for corruption.

. . . "Mayor Henyard sucked at corruption. You have to be pretty bad when a lightweight like Lightfoot catches you.

"From Karen Bass in LA to Michelle Wu in Boston, first women of color make terrible mayors. The feds recently indicted New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell for corruption.

"Ending racial discrimination was noble but also practical because we stopped having to hire incompetents because they were white men."

All qualifying to be commentators on MSNBC, or whatever their name is MSnow.

Sunday, August 24, 2025

This Is How You Know Dems Might Be Panicking Over That Sign Attacking Winsome Sears

 Townhall   

"Also, this woman stuck around. It’s not like she was asked to leave. All the tactics liberals have used to cancel people are now eating their own." 

Arlington Dems’ Chairman Steve Baker was in plain sight of Anita Martineau’s racist sign, hours before he whispered to hide it since it was going viral. They all thought it was clever, until 🇺🇸 called out the racism. @SpanbergerForVA’s supporters were ALL in for boys & men in girls’ bathrooms, until the sign 🪧 was a liability. DON’T pretend the apology is sincere.


"It’s moments like this that end campaigns. Terry McAuliffe sealed his fate against Glenn Youngkin after he imploded in the debates, where he went full communist on education and parental rights, saying parents shouldn’t have a say in what schools teach their children.

"The ‘We own your kids’ attitude killed him. In 2025, Republican gubernatorial candidate Winsome Sears addressed a meeting of the Arlington County School Board after a sex offender gained access to a girls’ restroom at a local high school, claiming to be transgender. Of course, rich white liberals came out to rally for this insanity to continue. And one sign made the event go viral: some woman had a poster that said, “Hey Winsome, if trans can’t share your bathroom, then blacks can’t share my water fountain.”

"Democrats are going back to their Klan roots. It caused an issue, though the woman claimed it was done as satire. And like Democrats on messaging, it missed the mark by 137 miles. Arlington Democrats condemned the sign and tried to create some distance, but their remarks got a bit funny when they said this woman is not affiliated with them. Guys, we know she’s likely not part of the organization proper, but she supports you. Whether or not that’s fair or not is a moot point since liberals made it that way—this would be national news, with MSNBC and CNN special segments if the parties were switched."

Virginia Democrat Party Vice Chair: 'It's Winsome Sears' Fault That We're So Racist'  There are many anti-Sears posts, but we chose this as the definitive Democrat post. 

Marc Broklawski: What happened in Arlington wasn’t just about a meeting. It was about the climate Winsome Sears is creating, one where contempt is currency and neighbors are turned against each other.    @SpanbergerForVA  is running on something stronger: a Virginia where we solve problems, not invent enemies. marcbroklawski.substack.com/p/two-climates

Tulsi Strips Security Clearances From 37 Deep State Officials Tied to Trump-Russia Hoax – Here’s the Full List

 The Gateway Pundit  "ODNI Tulsi Gabbard stripped security clearances from 37 Deep State officials tied to the Trump-Russia hoax.

"Clapper’s aide Vinh Nguyen was among the 37 stripped of his security clearance.

“Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right. Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold. In doing so, they undermine our national security, the safety and security of the American people and the foundational principles of our democratic republic,” Tulsi said.

"Here is the full list: (Click to enlarge)

Cristina Laila began writing for The Gateway Pundit in 2016 and she is now the Associate Editor.