UPDATE: German police ban anti-Islamic rally citing terror threat
UK Telegraph
"Foreign intelligence agencies have intercepted discussions by Islamist militants about possible attacks on weekly marches organised by Germany's new anti-Islamic movement, a news weekly reported on Friday, without citing its sources.
"Der Spiegel magazine said that foreign intelligence services had picked up the content of communications by some "known international jihadists", without giving specific details.
"The intelligence, which was passed to German authorities, indicated they had discussed possible attacks on the rallies organised by the so-called group, *"Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamisation of the Occident" (Pegida), the magazine said in a pre-released story to appear in this weekend's edition." . . .
So how has refusing to use the words "radical Islam" worked out for us? We could have been speaking all along the way Gov. Jindal will be this Monday and how would we be any worse off?
Jindal's Brilliant Take on Radical Islam . . . "Early in the speech Jindal says he’s not going to be politically correct. And he uses the term “radical Islamists” without hesitation, placing much of the blame for the Paris murders and all radical Islamist terrorism on a refusal of Muslim leaders to denounce these acts.
Jindal says, “Muslim leaders must make clear that anyone who commits acts of terror in the name of Islam is in fact not practicing Islam at all. If they refuse to say this, then they are condoning these acts of barbarism. There is no middle ground.” . . .
. . .
"This is the great challenge of our time. In the early years of the 21st century, it appears the great goal of our age is the defeat of radical Islam.
"Jindal gets it."
"Jindal gets it."
No comments:
Post a Comment