CNN's Anderson Cooper show didn't quite get the answers on the Kavanaugh case from a group of women they were hoping to get. Other women resist the left as well.

See also this: For Kavanaugh fight, news media toss their standards in the trash
This sets the tone for the next article and video where the CNN reporter argues with the ladies over their opinions.

When the puppets won't cooperate: CNN surprised by women's reaction to Kavanaugh case  
Always keep in mind the shared goal CNN has with "Ford's known left-wing and pro-abortion activism." TD
"It's always tough when the puppets don't behave.

"So it seemed when CNN interviewed five women and found that all five supported the Supreme Court nomination of Brett Kavanaugh.

"The female interviewer, who was with Anderson Cooper's AC360° team, found that much to her surprise, the Republican women just didn't keep to the script and ended up arguing with them.

"Daily Wire reporter Ryan Saavedra posted on Twitter with merriment the frustrating exchange:" . . .   (Apologies for the poor video quality)

. . . "To see CNN frustrated that its script was not going according to plan is entertaining stuff, indeed.  You can just see those thought bubbles asking how that bunch got past the producers."

Reagan McCarthy:  Women's March Equates Republicans' Handling of Kavanaugh Hearings With Misogyny  . . .  "Dr. Ford disclosed her alleged story to Senator Diane Feinstein, a ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, back in July when Judge Kavanaugh was initially nominated to the high court by President Trump. Rather than making any attempt to handle this charge made by Dr. Ford, and afford her the right to be heard, Feinstein chose to sit on the letter until after Judge Kavanaugh’s hearings.

"Still, left-wing interest groups frame Senate Republicans, who invited Dr. Ford to testify in any capacity in which she felt comfortable, as the villians. The Senate GOP proposed that the committee hear from both Judge Kavanaugh and Dr. Ford in the interest of due process and transparency for the public. This was not enough for far-left groups such as NARAL, Planned Parenthood and the Women’s March. Particularly, the Women’s March, framed the GOP’s push for Judge Kavanaugh to have the opportunity to defend himself, and Dr. Ford to be able tell her story, as misogyny:" . . .
. . . "Despite what these interest groups may think, the Judicial System does not presume guilt. The United States was built on the principle of presumed innocence until guilt is proven. These groups would rather see a man who has served the public for 30 years, with a stellar record of intelligence and integrity in his jurisprudence, have his life and career  ruined before his guilt is proven, rather than conduct a fair investigation for these allegations."

Allie Stuckey: Before Believing Kavanaugh's Accuser   . . ."A personal rendering of Ford’s account published by the Washington Post is certainly more credible than the vague allusion to a possible accusation published by Feinstein. But, unfortunately, one woman’s uncorroborated story released in the midst of a heated partisan fight in which Democrats have already demonstrated an  aversion to facts  can not be taken at face value. Before believing Kavanaugh’s accuser, there are a few aspects of this scenario that should give us pause." . . . 

'The Left's View'