Friday, September 4, 2020

Don't mess with Queen Pelosi


Nancy Pelosi is just too important to obey the rules  . . . Yes, Nancy, regular people must wear masks at a salon these days — if they can find one open.
"What a slap in the face to Americans across the country out of work because of lockdown rules.
"As Kious told Fox News, “If she is in there comfortably without a mask and feeling safe, then why are we shut down?”
"Clearly because Nancy Pelosi is too important to be bothered." . . .

Tony Branco


Salon owner Erica Kious fights back tears as she denies setting up Nancy Pelosi . . . “ 'Of course, since I had no contact with Mrs. Pelosi or her team for any of this and Jonathan is the only one they communicated with, if there was a setup, it only could have been Jonathan who orchestrated it,” Kious continued.
" 'In fact, not only did I not set her up, her assertion that she is a victim and set up is totally false and outrageous,” she added." . . .
Millionaire Pelosi is out to destroy the struggling salon owner who exposed her hypocrisy  . . . "Pelosi is now speaker of the House. She lives in the wealthiest neighborhood in the nation and has an estimated net worth of $114 million.
"So, it would be disgusting enough to see her attack and attempt to destroy a struggling single mother's business, even if the economy were booming. But Pelosi is now doing just that amid a global pandemic and endless rioting that have destroyed more than 10 million jobs and countless businesses." . . .
. . . "Pelosi didn't just claim that salon owner Erica Kious, a single mother whose business has struggled under California's draconian lockdown, deliberately set her up, an implausible claim, since it's unclear how Kious could have made Pelosi not wear a mask. Now, Pelosi's daughter, Christine, has released a letter from a lawyer representing the independent stylist who gave Pelosi the blowout at Kious's facility, charging Kious with "furthering a set-up of Speaker Pelosi" by authorizing the appointment and then releasing the footage." . . .

No comments: