The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaChance Conservative scholar and historian Victor Davis Hanson has weighed in on the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump from the 2024 ballot in a new column that poses some very important questions.
"Hanson reminds readers that Kamala Harris supported the riots of 2020 and that Chuck Schumer threatened two justices on the U.S. Supreme Court and asks if those acts qualify as forms of insurrection.
"He also wonders if the left realizes where all of this is taking the country.
"Hanson writes at American Greatness:
"Conservative scholar and historian Victor Davis Hanson has weighed in on the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump from the 2024 ballot in a new column that poses some very important questions.
"Hanson reminds readers that Kamala Harris supported the riots of 2020 and that Chuck Schumer threatened two justices on the U.S. Supreme Court and asks if those acts qualify as forms of insurrection.
"He also wonders if the left realizes where all of this is taking the country.
"Hanson writes at American Greatness:
"Trump Derangement Syndrome became Orwellian with the recent ruling of the Colorado Supreme Court.
"It approved the erasure of Trump from the Republican primary ballot in Colorado, by invoking Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
"That ossified clause was intended to bar any ante-bellum federal officials who joined the Confederacy from again holding federal offices after 1865.
"In no way is Trump’s conduct on January 6 comparable to calling for secession, much less prompting a Civil War that cost the country 700,000 lives.
"An “insurrectionist” president does not address unarmed protestors with qualifiers like, “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”
"How also can one be guilty of insurrection without ever being indicted for such a supposed crime, much less convicted of it?
"And the more we learn about January 6, all the more it appears to have been a spontaneous riot, more buffoonish in nature than conspiratorial.
"No one has explained the mysterious, politicized January 6 refusal of the Speaker of the House to order a reinforcement of the Capitol police." . . . Hanson then points to this moment from two years ago:
Schumer is inciting violence towards Supreme Court Justices Gorsuch & Kavanaugh. 👇🏻
— GT SD Jack’s 🐰🐰 (@realredsd) December 22, 2023
“You will pay the price! You won’t know what hit you!” “This was an insurrection.”
It’s a felony to threaten justice’s.(sp)
Be nice if someone would arrest Chuck.pic.twitter.com/UWGTXwoybT
No comments:
Post a Comment