Daniel Jupp - Jupplandia (substack.com)
A Constitutional Republic following the US Constitution dismisses these fraudulent cases before they ever get this far. Only a functional tyranny allows them to proceed.
"I can’t recall the first time I heard the word ‘lawfare’, and I don’t know who came up with it. It seems like a neologism coined recently, but it may have older origins. After all, this is not the first time in history that a judicial system has been deeply corrupt. It’s just the first time in history that a judicial system has been deeply corrupt against an illegally ousted President of the United States of America who is still alive while almost everyone accepts the process of that corruption as completely normal.
"I saw a widely circulated, well respected Substack the other day saying what a wise friend of mine has said for a long time. My friend, who is a lawyer by profession, has long argued that the cases being conducted against Trump are so unjust, so prejudicial, and so patently ridiculous that the proper response is to refuse to comply with them in any way. He’s said that Trump should refuse to attend these courts, should hole up somewhere in a potentially sympathetic State (such as Florida) and dare the corrupt system to forcibly remove him from that bolt hole." . . .
"There are no Democrats who aren’t tainted by this, either in government posts or legal professions, and it is a taint which encompasses ordinary Democrat voters too. All of them have accepted and supported, have cheered on, the total corruption of the law to punish and harm a man they hate. Having failed to ever find real crimes he is guilty of, they have simply decided that ordinary actions are criminal ones, so long as Donald Trump did them." Full article
No comments:
Post a Comment