The American Spectator; Some Democrats finally realize why they are losing.
“This is another stupid word, ‘Oligarch,’” James Carville said on his podcast. “Who in the f— knows what an oligarch is? . . ."
![]() |
| Experts Now Recommend Changing Your Gender Fluid Every 3 Months Or 3,000 TikTok Posts |
"Do you know that you are a cis-male?” comedian Norm Macdonald asked a flummoxed Stephen Merchant, the co-creator of The Office, nine years ago. Macdonald explained of the peculiar “cis” prefix: “It’s a way of marginalizing a normal person.”
"At least that amounts to the intent. The result of such terms marginalizes the speaker, at least when in mixed company. Self-marginalization does not work in politics. Some Democrats only recently learned this.
"Cisgender, Latinx, pregnant person, undocumented worker, equity, oligarch, and intersectionality amount to but a few of the buzzwords and buzzphrases used by Democrats more to announce themselves better than everyone else than to win a majority of everyone else over. This clique races not for votes but to see who can use the most characters, and know what each one stands for, in their version of LGBTQIA2S+.
" 'I’m empathetic and sympathetic to a child trying to figure out their pronoun,” Rahm Emmanuel told the Wall Street Journal in an interview, “but it doesn’t trump the fact that the rest of the class doesn’t know what a pronoun is.” (RELATED: Democrats’ ‘Trans’ Intransigence)
"Other Democrats also grasp the futility of all this for a political party. They are speaking out — all at the same time and saying the same thing because Democrats do it like that — against the wisdom of herdspeak jargon for a 50-plus-one endeavor.
" 'Some words are just too Ivy League-tested terms,” Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona told the Washington Post. “I’m going to piss some people off by saying this, but ‘social equity’ — why do we say that? Why don’t we say, ‘We want you to have an even chance’?”...

No comments:
Post a Comment