Gov. Gavin Newsom: How to Destroy California in Less than 10 Years
"If I was a “progressive” governor and wanted to destabilize and destroy my state, there are certain policies I would impose, and orders I’d make, while insulating myself from my own policies:" . . .
 |
| Toon added by TD . . . "Good job Gavin. You’ve outdone yourself. "Newsom’s policies have expedited the destruction of the most beautiful state; accelerated the declining population through outbound migration resulting in the loss of a congressional seat. He has irreparably harmed California’s businesses and once thriving economy starting with his 3 years of Covid lockdowns, which hurt mostly small business owners the most. Newsom more than quadrupled the drug-addicted homeless vagrants living on California streets making cities unlivable. He bolstered labor unions while crushing independent contractors and gig workers. Gavin Newsom increased poverty in California while growing state government. "It’s as if Gov. Newsom was very carefully and specifically trained on what it would take to destroy California – the one thing in which he actually excels – that, and feathering his own nest with ill-gotten gains." . . . |
 |
| Hat tip to Elizabeth A Wysocki |
Newsom silent on anti-ICE rhetoric after Dallas shooting, despite urging nonviolence
. . . "Fox News Digital pressed Newsom on whether he regrets his anti-ICE rhetoric and his support for a new, Democrat-led state law he signed Saturday prohibiting masks and other implements used to obscure ICE officers’ identities.Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, separately slammed Newsom -- along with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y. -- after the Dallas ICE shooting, saying his "rhetoric must end."
Meanwhile, Vice President JD Vance proclaimed that "if your rhetoric encourages violence… you can go straight to Hell."
. . . "After the Panera Bread debacle, Gavin Newsom found himself in hot water once more after signing the new Safety Act into law, which relieves teachers of their duty to inform a child's parents of their gender identity without the kid in question giving them the okay to do so. In short, the Act is a means to prevent children from being forced to disclose their gender identity or sexual orientation to their parents before they're ready. When Newsom signed the Safety Act into law, there was an explosion of criticism, to the extent that the Chino Valley Unified School District in Southern California filed a lawsuit against the governor, decrying it as unconstitutional and professing that the law was in violation of parents' First and Fourteenth Amendment rights." . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment