Tuesday, January 13, 2026

Well, well, well, look what Tim Walz signed into law in 2020…

 Revolver News

"She is not just dropping her kids off at school. She did not just happen to encounter ICE. She is dancing in her car while blocking the road. This is what she felt was more important than being there for her children. Once again, stay out of law enforcement's operations, don't try to run them down, and you will remain breathing."


. . . "In reality, Ms. Good was part of ICE Watch, a radical anti-ICE group whose sole purpose is disruption and baiting law enforcement."

Subd. 2.Use of deadly force.
(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 609.06 or 609.065, the use of deadly force by a peace officer in the line of duty is justified only if an objectively reasonable officer would believe, based on the totality of the circumstances known to the officer at the time and without the benefit of hindsight, that such force is necessary:

(1) to protect the peace officer or another from death or great bodily harm, provided that the threat:

(i) can be articulated with specificity;

(ii) is reasonably likely to occur absent action by the law enforcement officer; and

(iii) must be addressed through the use of deadly force without unreasonable delay; or

(2) to effect the arrest or capture, or prevent the escape, of a person whom the peace officer knows or has reasonable grounds to believe has committed or attempted to commit a felony and the officer reasonably believes that the person will cause death or great bodily harm to another person under the threat criteria in clause (1), items (i) to (iii), unless immediately apprehended.

(b) A peace officer shall not use deadly force against a person based on the danger the person poses to self if an objectively reasonable officer would believe, based on the totality of the circumstances known to the officer at the time and without the benefit of hindsight, that the person does not pose a threat of death or great bodily harm to the peace officer or to another under the threat criteria in paragraph (a), clause (1), items (i) to (iii). . . .

Entire article here:  

No comments: