Sunday, May 24, 2026

Dems React to Gabbard's Tragic News the Only Way They Know How: With an Utter Lack of Class or Humanity

 Bob Hoge

  "Remember why she left the democrats because they were corrupt and if you did not toe the line 100% and cow tow to [Hillary] Clinton and the rest of the Democrat leaders you got cancelled."

Can anyone please define "my thoughts go out . . ."?

"California Sen. Adam Schiff (D) is one of the most insidious Democrats in Congress, and that’s saying a lot these days. He reminds me of former FBI Director James Comey, since they both ooze fake sincerity and piousness even though their hands are dirtier than a kid’s in a mud puddle.

When news broke Friday that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was stepping away from her post because her husband had been diagnosed with a rare and serious form of bone cancer, decent people immediately felt for her and prayed for her husband’s recovery.

“Decent” isn’t an adjective used frequently to describe the man known as “Shifty Schiff,” however, and he wasted no time before trashing Gabbard for her DNI tenure. Did he really think it was appropriate to drop a nakedly partisan job performance review just hours after she’d revealed her husband of 11 years could be in mortal danger?

I’ve run out of ways to describe "disgusting" when it comes to Schiff." . . .

. . . "My thoughts go out to Tulsi Gabbard and her family, as her husband battles this serious health problem. I hope and pray that he makes a speedy and full recovery.

"Why didn't you stop there, Adam? Because you seemingly have a black hole where your heart is supposed to be:

While the circumstances around her departure are deserving of our sympathy, let’s be clear: Tulsi Gabbard’s only positive contribution to our nation's national security is her resignation.

She politicized intelligence. She dismantled critical agencies keeping Americans safe. She weaponized the IC to pursue baseless election fraud claims. And more.

We must ensure that her tenure — marked by a devotion to the person of the president and not to the security of the country — represents a terrible exception at DNI and not the new normal. . . .More...

No comments: