Democrats Sit-In Is Nothing But A Fundraising Ploy

"They just want to be able to campaign on, "_______ voted to allow ISIS to get dangerous weapons!' "

RedState   "If you thought Democrats were engaging in their little sit-in as some kind of principled means of getting Republicans to vote on bills that will not pass (and even if they did would be dead regardless because of the failure in the Senate), think again.

"This is a pointless exercise by the House Democrats. First of all, they're not going to get the votes they want. The votes would be pointless as any bill sent over to the Senate would be DOA. Mitch McConnell would simply table the bills and they would merely die. Secondly. even if House Democrats did get the votes, the measures would not pass. They know this. They just want to be able to campaign on, "_______ voted to allow ISIS to get dangerous weapons!' " . . .

Speaker Ryan Skewers Dems' Gun Control Sit-in: 'They're Trying to Get on TV'

"Paul Ryan shows screenshots of Democrats fundraising off sit-in over gun control"

No, Mr. President: You are not who we are

American Thinker

A recent poll shows that a plurality of Americans see Obama as the worst president since WWII.  Hopefully, the next president will get it right.  No, Mr. president, contrary to your world statesman narcissistic fantasy, most Americans believe that what is good for the U.S. is good for the world.

" Using the royal “we”, the president indicates his displeasure with the U.S. for failing to live up to his vision of how “we” should be with the phrase, “That is not who we are.”  No, Mr. President.  It is not so much that that is not who we are as that you are not who we are."

Girl Gives SEVERAL Examples Of GOOD Guys With Guns STOPPING Mass Shooters

Clash Daily   "Regis Giles of GirlsJustWannaHaveGuns.com lists a dozen times that mass shootings were stopped by a good person with a gun. Please forward this on to your liberals friends who believe in disarming responsible American citizens."

Good guy with a gun- a senior citizen!

BURKA BUMPERS: HILLARY’S DONORS LIMIT WOMEN TO DRIVING TOY CARS

Clinton's Saudi financial backers are not exactly feminists

InfoWars   "Hillary holds forth her candidacy as a triumph of feminism, yet her largest donors, Saudi Wahabists who brag that their contributions, are 20% of Hillary’s campaign coffer and ruthless oppressors of women.

"Case in point — the hunger of Saudi women to live free of the burka, to be free of the religious police, to be able to drive, even if its only BUMPER CARS on one night of the week when only women are admitted in an amusement park.

Liberal reporters scramble to justify Hillary's ties to anti-woman dictators

Trump's speech: Why couldn't other Republicans ever be this angry at Clinton/ Democrat corruption?

"Here's another question that I have: If Hillary Clinton has the answers for the economy, why doesn't she tell Obama what to do now?  Why do we have to wait until she maybe gets elected and then gets inaugurated and then starts putting her ideas into practice?  If she's got the answers, why wait?  Why doesn't she make it a point to meet with Obama, who's in the Oval Office and say, "Barack, this is what we need to do to fix the economy," to which he's gonna say (impression), "Uh, there nothing wrong. "

Rush Limbaugh: Finally a Republican (Other Than Me) Tells the Truth About Hillary Clinton  "Well, I have to tell you, my email is overflowing with people calling Trump's speech a home run.  People are saying, "Finally! It's about time somebody started telling the truth about Hillary Clinton, and it's not you." . . .  

"It happens it was a speech given on the prompter today down at SoHo, one of Trump's hotels that he owns.  So Trump basically said things about Hillary Clinton that you just don't hear Republicans saying.  You've heard them before.  You've heard them on this program, of course.  You've probably heard similar things that Trump said in other areas.  But you just do not hear Mitt Romney say this, for example.  You wouldn't hear the Bush family talk this way about Hillary.  You wouldn't. You just wouldn't hear it. 

"You wouldn't hear fellow establishment types talk about this, 'cause it's too close to home for all of them.  But Trump can say this stuff as an outsider. He can say this stuff as a nonmember of the elite or the establishment, and it's gonna be interesting to see, because while everything Trump said about Hillary has been said before by people -- and, of course, we have the Peter Schweizer book, Clinton Cash, which Trump quoted from extensively.  You don't see things like that happen, either. "

Clinton Defenders Struggle to Respond to Trump's Speech  . . . "RUSH: Look, I know this has been a speedy search.  I can't find anywhere where the Peter Schweizer book Clinton Cash has been "discredited" like David "Rodham" Gergen said, and he just said it like everybody knows it's been discredited.  Now, I think people in the Clinton camp like David "Rodham" Gergen -- and I really believe this." . . .

Rush gives us this link:New York Times: Donald Trump’s Speech: What You Missed and Our Fact Checks

Obama’s whitewashing of the Orlando massacre

Washington Times

"Of course, it is all part of Mr. Obama’s plan to exacerbate those very questions about where he was born and whether he is a closet Muslim — because that automatically turns even decent people into frothing lunatics for dabbling in such conspiracies and innuendo.

"His is the lowest, most crass and degrading cynicism and it permeates every action and every statement made by this White House.

"The first Clinton administration is already recorded in the history books for its debased, raunchy and utterly disgusting self-adulation and false promotion. The Obama White House is that — only on Viagra."  . . . 

Added by TD

. . . "The Department of “Justice” scrubbed the name “Allah” from Mateen’s prayers and professions of allegiance to said “Allah,” along with the Islamic State and al Qaeda and all the rest of the savages out to kill gays, lesbians, Jews, Christians and basically anyone who is part of civilized society." . . .

"In a rare full-throated media campaign this week, Attorney General Loretta Lynch said  references to “Allah” would be removed so as not to “further this man’s propaganda.”

"But, mostly, it is yet another bizarre example of the president trying to protect and promote the religion of Islam, which — by the way — is having a bit of a public relations problem on its own these last few years.

"Throwing gays off rooftops, burning men alive in cages and drowning them will do right much to sully even the best reputations.

"So, in yet another effort to rehab the name of Islam, Mr. Obama erased references to “Allah” from 911 tapes because he did not want to “further this man’s propaganda.' ” . . .

Feminists Upset That Physical Standards For Marines Are Too Tough for Women

Once again, liberals breed mediocrity in everything they touch. Every professional force that stands between us and those who would do us harm is made inept by liberal social engineering. TD

Truth Revolt

"Radical feminists rejoiced with shouts of equality when all combat jobs were opened to women last December. Yet, now they're finding it frustrating that the physical standards to be a Marine are just too dang hard for women.

"Kathleen Wong writes about this at Mic.com, charging that the physical requirements "overwhelmingly weed out women:"

[T]he United States Marine Corps established a new set of physical standards designed to weed out anyone who isn't physically up to par for such a position.

The Marines, which voiced the loudest objections to Defense Secretary Ash Carter's decision, put into place a new plan designed to be more inclusive.

But instead of leveling the playing field, the new standards have generated some shockingly disparate results: Of the recruits who took the test, 86% of the women failed compared to 3% of men.

AMERICA'S REAL RACISTS; David Horowitz's "Progressive Racism" exposes them -- and names them.

Frontpage



"It's unlikely that you've ever heard of the late Oseola McCarty (1908-99), but David Horowitz will never forget her—nor how her life story served as a testament to the limitless possibilities that are open to all Americans, regardless of race, if they will simply refuse to view themselves as helpless victims of circumstance. McCarty was a black, uneducated, hardworking, longtime cleaning woman from Mississippi, and Horowitz reflects upon her in his new book, Progressive Racism. The author cites McCarty as a flesh-and-blood refutation of the progressive article-of-faith which maintains that because “America is saturated with racism and oppression,” nonwhite minorities “cannot compete unless the system is rigged in their favor.” “A black woman living in the most racist and poorest state in the union (almost half her life under segregation),” writes Horowitz, was able to earn, from her modest wages, “enough money washing other people's clothes to save $150,000 and give it away”—to a student scholarship program at the University of Southern Mississippi. “If Oseola McCarty can do that, what American black or white cannot?' ” . . .

HOW DOES IMMIGRATION REDUCE MASS SHOOTINGS?

"Why do we need this? How are our current immigration policies helping the people who already live here? How are they making our country better, stronger, safer?"  

Ann Coulter   "With the media frantically hiding the content of Donald Trump's terrorism speech from last week, he should respond to every question with the central point of that speech: How does this kind of immigration make our country better? How does it make the country safer? 

"Media: Show us your tax returns! 

"Trump: Show me how our immigration policies are good for the people who already live here. 

"Media: Tell us why you fired Corey Lewandowski! 

"Trump: Tell me how our immigration policies are making the country safer for the people who already live here. 

"Media: How are you going to match Hillary's corporate fundraising? 

"Trump: How are our immigration policies helping the people who already live here? 

"Sooner or later people will say, "That's a good question -- why is this necessary?" 

"When the Third World immigrants admitted under Sen. Teddy Kennedy's 1965 Immigration Act -- as well as their children -- commit mass murder, the government and media tell us it's a gun problem. Or it's "our" culture. Or it's "homophobia." Or we have to keep admitting millions of Muslims because otherwise the ones already here will REALLY hate us. 

"Isn't that extortion? We've already admitted millions of Muslim immigrants, but if we don't take in millions more, the ones we've admitted will go on killing sprees? 

"How did we get in the position where we're screwed if we're not in the good graces of the Muslim community? Maybe we should stop doing that. " . . .

Remember how Obama blames all his failures on the previous administration?

Check Out Hillary’s ‘Standard Requirements’ For A Speaking Engagement…

Weasel Zippers
Remember when Hillary explained her mega bucks speaking fee with this answer?



Offered to her...or demanded by her?  Observe:

"So no, she was not paid ‘what they offered’, but rather, what she demanded as a standard. Further, she has to have all her other expenditures and staff covered and paid for as well."

As William Safire said of Hillary, she is "a congenital liar".

Obama: Anti-Anti-Terrorist

"Sharia supremacists are not only shielded from scrutiny by U.S. intelligence but welcomed into the national-security apparatus."

 

Andrew C. McCarthy  "Barack Obama has spent his presidency cultivating Islamists, particularly from the international Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates in the United States. As we saw this week, he chafes at the term “radical Islam” — as do his Islamist advisers. At their insistence, he had instructional materials for training government agents purged of references to Islamic terms that illuminate the nexus between Muslim doctrine and jihadist terror. 

"Obama’s vaunted national-security strategy, “Countering Violent Extremism,” is Orwellian. The term CVE supplants identification of our jihadist enemies with the woolly notion that “violence” can be caused by any form of “extremism” — it has nothing to do with Islam. By transferring security responsibilities from government intelligence agents to Muslim “community leaders” (often, Islamist groups), CVE actually encourages violent extremism." . . .

Redactor-in-Chief Whites Out Orlando Killer’s Islamo-motives

. . . "As for the why, President Obama cannot handle the truth. Instead, Obama has become the redactor-in-chief. He and his allies have rolled out barrels of Wite-Out to obscure the fact that Mateen was a radical Muslim, and his mass homicide was a self-described act of radical-Islamic carnage in service to ISIS. Obama’s Justice Department and Attorney General Loretta Lynch got Liquid Paper all over their faces Monday as they tried to hide Mateen’s Islamic-terror ties before they suddenly reversed themselves as rage and ridicule rightly rained down on them." . . .