What the Kennedys want - William Lippincott
"To RFK Jr., I don’t know what to say. I would ask where he thinks the despotic behavior of the DNC comes from." . . .
 |
| Tom Stiglich |
"RFK Jr. made big news last week when he suspended his presidential campaign and endorsed Donald Trump. There is a meaningful backdrop to this epiphany, as the DNC has been creative and highly driven to block RFK Jr.’s quest for the presidency.
Is this messy sideshow indicative of what Dems mean by “our Democracy”? How about Kamala Harris’s smoke-filled-room appointment as Democrat nominee for president after Joe Biden’s wheelchair was pushed over the edge? Never mind.
The juiciest substory is the Kennedy family’s expression of disappointment.
“We want an America filled with hope and bound together by a shared vision of a brighter future, a future defined by individual freedom, economic promise and national pride,” a statement signed by five of the former third-party presidential candidate’s siblings said.
"The family added, “We believe in Harris and Walz.”
"All right — just another political squabble over a family gathering. But wait a minute: how well do the Kennedy aspirations line up with the Democrat campaign? Let’s parse the letter and find out." . . .
RFK, Jr. Denounces Totalitarianism That Drove Him Out Of Democratic Party (legalinsurrection.com)
. . .“It ran a sham primary that was rigged to prevent any serious challenge to President Biden. Then, when a predictably bungled debate performance precipitated the palace coup against President Biden, the same, shadowy DNC operatives appointed his successor also without an election they installed a candidate who was so unpopular with voters that she dropped out in 2020 without winning a single delegate. My uncle and my father both relished debate. They prided themselves on their capacity go toe-to-toe with any opponent in the battle over ideas. They would be astonished to learn of a Democratic party presidential nominee who, like Vice President Harris, has not appeared in a single interview or an unscripted encounter with voters for 35 days. This is profoundly undemocratic.”
"And another:
“What most alarms me isn’t how the Democratic Party conducts its internal affairs, or runs it candidates. What alarms me is the resort to censorship and media control, and the weaponization of the federal agencies. When a U.S. President colludes with or outright coerces media companies to censor political speech, it is an attack on our most sacred right of free expression, and that’s the very right upon which all of our other constitutional rights rest.” . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment