Another Major Programming Change at Fox News

American Thinker  "It was a week of big news at Fox News as the channel shuffled its nighttime program schedule, moving Hannity to 9 P.M. and adding a new show with Laura Ingraham starting October 30 at 10. On Thursday, there was another major announcement: also on October 30, following Ingraham’s new program, a new, live late evening hour devoted to hard news will debut at 11 P.M. Fox News @ Night will be anchored by veteran Fox News correspondent, host, and anchor Shannon Bream."
. . . 
"Shannon Bream is very open about her deep Christian faith. In 2013, she was the first woman graduate of Liberty University to deliver the school’s commencement address. Her new, more prominent profile at Fox News now will likely continue to rile enemies of Fox like Media Matters which has attacked Bream many times for her Christian beliefs."

. . . "In the key five hours of nightly programming (7 P.M. to 12 midnight M-F), three of the hours at Fox News will be anchored by women (Ingraham and Bream joining Martha MacCallum who does a live show at 7 P.M.) and two by men (Carlson and Hannity). At the other two cable news channels, only one woman is represented on each of them during those hours (Erin Burnett on CNN at 7 P.M. and Rachel Maddow on MSNBC at 9 P.M.)." . . .

Liberal outrage over Bream being called attractive by her presenter begins in three...two...one...

. . . "Brian Williams Wins Dan Rather Memorial Award for the Stupidest Analysis at MRC" . . .

Media Research Center  . . . 

. . . "The Federalist’s Senior Editor Mollie Hemingway served as the category’s presenter as attendees voted among the four possible quotes. Afterward, House Freedom Caucus Chairman and Republican Congressman Mark Meadows (N.C.) accepted the award in jest on Williams’s behalf.

"Meadows joked that Williams “would have been here, but he’s flying in a helicopter somewhere over Iraq.” 

"During his remarks, Meadows implored conservatives to “stay engaged” and thanked both Brent Bozell and the MRC for allowing conservatives to have “a level playing field where real conservatives can speak up and truly know that their voice will be heard.' ” . . .

"For all the noteworthy moments from the Gala, go here.

Bernie Sanders will debate Bill Cassidy and Lindsey Graham over health care on CNN

Circa

"CNN has announced that Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) will debate Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) over the latter pair's proposed Obamacare repeal bill on air, reports The Hill.

"CNN anchor Jake Tapper and chief political correspondent Dana Bash will moderate the town hall-style event live from Washington D.C." . . .

Heather Nauert holds her own against the media.

"NBC Reporter Gets Destroyed On Trump's Threat To North Korea"

State Dept. Defends Trump’s ‘Fire and Fury’ Edict: ‘The Kind of Language Kim Jong-un Will Understand’

"During a Wednesday afternoon press conference, State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert defended President Donald Trump’s “fire and fury” edict to North Korea.

"In a contentious exchange with NBC’s Andrea Mitchell, Nauert was asked about the claims from many in Congress that Trump’s warning to North Korea was bombastic or alarming.

“ 'What is alarming; two ICBM tests in less than a month,” Nauert said. “Two nuclear tests that took place last year…when there’s an earthquake in China, I get many emails and calls from [reporters] asking ‘Was it another nuclear test?’ That is how big of a deal this is, what’s going on.”

"Nauert added that tough talk is the only way to get through to North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un." . . .

Democrats Outrage After Progressives Reject Kamala Harris 2020

The Rational National

Published on Aug 1, 2017

After a number of pro-Kamala Harris articles surfaced online, it was clear that the Democratic Party establishment had picked their darling for 2020. But progressives aren't buying it.

This is labelled "The Worst of Kamala Harris"

What has happened to TV? No longer the "entertainment industry"; it's the indoctrination industry.

Squawking Hollywood Magpies Unleash Vulgar Attacks on Trump

. . . "It was not so much an awards ceremony as it was a more narcissistic version of a Democratic National Committee meeting. The self-absorbed crowd lavished love on Hillary Clinton and hurled insults at President Trump.

"Within just a few minutes, host [late-night-talk-weasel] Stephen Colbert had navigated through an opening segment that included references to the Confederacy, global warming and Nazis.

“Imagine if your president wasn’t loved by Nazis,” Julia Louis-Dreyfus said.

"At least they did not spontaneously thrust their hands in the air and shout, “Heil, Hitler.”

Mr. Colbert and the audience should be commended for their restraint." . . .

Carlson: Emmys Showed Many of America’s Most Famous Artists Aren’t Artists — ‘Hacks,’ ‘Their Shows Are Dumb’

So celebrities are liberal. They don’t like Trump. Whatever. That’s fine. In fact, it’s normal. That is not what is striking here. Last night’s show wasn’t really about Trump. It was an expression of the contempt America’s ruling class has for the rest of this country, for the zip codes they don’t live in. The middle class elected Donald Trump last November. Last night Hollywood denounced them for doing it.

Kimmel on Fox News Host: I’ll ‘Pound’ that ‘Phony Little Creep’ the Next Time I See Him

". . . the comedian took aim at conservatives who spent the day criticizing his previous night’s impassioned monologue.

Also here.

'Justice pricing' at movie theater: $15 for white males, $10 for everyone else

. . . "The injustice of "social justice" has never been more apparent. Ask your average SJW to define "social justice" and you'll get a dozen or more different replies.

"Except for one, common thread; stick it to the white man." . . .

NRO: Jimmy Kimmel, Policy-Wonk Wannabe  . . . "Perhaps it was a mistake for a senator to arrogate rhetorical supremacy to a comedian, but Cassidy, for his part, has since pushed back. “I am sorry he does not understand,” Cassidy said today on CNN. “There will be more people covered under the Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson amendment than under the status quo,” he said later on MSNBC, explaining that his bill requires “coverage” of pre-existing conditions “to be ‘adequate and affordable.' ’”

Back-to-Back: Trump at the UN and the Emmys  

. . . "This is hard to digest for the Never Trumpers as well.  How can this man suddenly be emerging as the most important player on the world stage?  He's a reality star.  He should be on the Emmys.  (He should.  He's actually funnier than Alec Baldwin and certainly than Colbert with his juvenile Hitler jokes that would embarrass Mel Brooks.)

. . . "World leaders watching this realize that America is being led by someone with actual convictions who may, just may, act on them.  There's a switch after eight years of Obama when no one thought America would do much of anything -- and indeed it didn't, even when confronted by the horror of chemical weapons.

We who supported the TEA Party mission will never get over this Hollywood declaration of war on us: 
 "Law & Order": another TV show that sucker-punches half the American population  Rerun from Monday, February 28, 2011
Why, you ask? Because this same episode of Law & Order ran on TNT again this week"We began watching a 2009 episode of "Law and Order" entitled "Fed" last night and I had to shut it off at the start. We saw people like ourselves - TEA par-tiers, portrayed as rifle-toting, hateful bigots. Only Hollywood is capable of inspiring dislike and outrage by the simple means of the skillful acting of those who portray people like you and me as despicable and violent. They give us the same treatment they give to pharmaceutical  and insurance companies.


"May God bless all courageous conservatives in our country trying to stem the socialist tide sweeping America because the left has such massive force to bring against them. And the propaganda is being spoon-fed to the American public. How do we stand a chance?"

Hillary’s New — Ever Lengthening — List of Lies

Rich Terrell

Well, here is one book sold, unless she gave it to the guy:

She has no idea why many Americans think ‘Clintonian’ is another way of saying ‘dishonest.’  . . . "She has little to offer about the race in Michigan except the drive-by insult of a suggestion that white Michiganders are so racist that they turned against her for offering support to the mostly black population of Flint during its water crisis. Clinton also has nothing to say about the hubris of her futile campaigning in Arizona as she dreamed of running up the Electoral College score on Trump. As for her losing Pennsylvania, which no Democrat had managed to do since 1988, Clinton is correct to protest that she spent lots of time and money there. But her cries of racism ring hollow; as Albert Hunt wrote in a Bloomberg column, Clinton probably would have won Pennsylvania if black turnout had even come close to what it was in 2012." . . .

". . . she apparently did favors for donors in deals that caused Andrew C. McCarthy to liken her State Department to “a racketeering enterprise.” For Hillary, it’s the equivalent of O. J. Simpson’s protesting that there were lots of days on which he didn’t murder his ex-wife."

Scenes From Hillary Clinton’s Book Tour  . . . “I paid twelve fifty on StubHub for two tickets,” she said, standing outside of the Warner Theatre, nearly two hours before Clinton’s first stop on a speaking tour promoting her new book. “No, not twelve dollars and fifty cents. Twelve hundred and fifty dollars.”…

Sharyl Attkisson explains what we are up against

It looks like Obama did spy on Trump, just as he apparently did to me

Thomas Lifson  "This is easily the read of the day.  Sharyl Attkisson is the bravest reporter of her generation, so much of a threat to people with access to the capabilities of our intel agencies that she was spied upon and worse. Today she faces the ugly truth about what recent reports (if true) reveal:

Nobody wants our intel agencies to be used like the Stasi in East Germany; the secret police spying on its own citizens for political purposes. The prospect of our own NSA, CIA and FBI becoming politically weaponized has been shrouded by untruths, accusations and justifications.

"She goes on to review a number of instances of us being lied to about spying, about spying on journalists, and then gets to her personal experience in fighting back against an actual hack she experienced while at CBS News: . . .
. . . 

"Sharyl is fighting back, and is not shying away from what she sees, though she wisely avoids terms like deep state or establishment. She is reporting:

It’s difficult not to see patterns in the government’s behavior, unless you’re wearing blinders.

·       The intelligence community secretly expanded its authority in 2011 so it can monitor innocent U.S. citizens like you and me for doing nothing more than mentioning a target’s name a single time.

·       In January 2016, a top secret inspector general report found the NSA violated the very laws designed to prevent abuse.

·       In 2016, Obama officials searched through intelligence on U.S. citizens a record 30,000 times, up from 9,500 in 2013.

·       Two weeks before the election, at a secret hearing before the FISA court overseeing government surveillance, NSA officials confessed they’d violated privacy safeguards “with much greater frequency” than they’d admitted. The judge accused them of “institutional lack of candor” and said, “this is a very serious Fourth Amendment issue.”

"Read the whole thing, I mean it."

"Don’t Read Into John Kelly’s Facepalm During Trump’s UN Speech"

Independent Sentinal  "Was Chief of Staff John Kelly demonstrating his lack of support for the President as he spoke before the UN on Tuesday? The retired general is said to be a Democrat who voted for Hillary Clinton.

"Photos seem to suggest he was exasperated and it isn’t the first time he’s done this, it’s the third, but spokesperson Sarah Huckabee Sanders said not so fast."

. . . "Sanders told “Fox & Friends” on Wednesday morning that Kelly, who she said has “a great chemistry” with Trump, was likely just tired from the demands of the job.

“ 'The president has an abundance of energy, I don’t know where it comes from, all of us on the staff are tired trying to keep up with him,” Sanders said. “I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s part of it.”

“ 'It doesn’t mean he’s upset by the speech?” host Brian Kilmeade asked.

Sanders replied that Kelly has been “part of the speech-writing process” and “very engaged.”

“ 'So he read the speech ahead of time, so any reaction it might be because he’s tired, or he’s just got his hand on his forehead and the media wants to run with it,” host Ainsley Earhardt said." . . .

They Don't Call It "The Great Tweet of China"

Ann Coulter  . . . "For most of the nation's history, the primary job of the military -- of which President Trump is the commander in chief -- was building walls and fortresses on our borders. That's why we have an Army Corps of Engineers. It may not seem like it from recent history, but the job of our military is to protect America's borders -- not Ukraine's borders, not Jordan's borders. 

"This is our one and only chance to get this done, and we're losing the fight. While Trump dallies, last week California became a sanctuary state. Sixteen-year-old girls are taking lessons to learn to be safe drivers, but when they're smashed into by drunk-driving illegal aliens, the state won't tell ICE, and taxpayers will spend $40 million to pay for their defense. 

"The wall has to get built, and nothing else matters. 

"Trump will not be able to tweet his way out of not building the wall. He will not be able to change the subject by attacking the media or Crooked Hillary. He will not be able to get away with blaming Republicans in Congress. 

"Obviously, it suits the rest of the traitorous GOP -- which ferociously opposed him -- to pretend that Trump's election had nothing to do with immigration. " . . .

Unleashing the Power of Mockery on Annoying Social Justice Warriors

Kurt Schlichter

"In a culture where humorless leftists scolds seek to impose their rule upon us normals by sucking every drop of joy out of life, it is the conservative smartass who is the true subversive. Don’t look to Hollywood’s allegedly edgy comics to zing the zeitgeist – hacky proggy stand-ups and interchangeable liberal late-night hosts are the opposite of rebels, with their dreadfully generic opinions and lockstep jokes designed to get the herd of trained seals that makes up their fishbreathed audience beating their flippers. No, if you want someone who snarks truth to power instead of speaking consensus coastal truth to the powerless, you gotta step to the right. 

. . . 

"Lisa is having none of their nonsense. A long-time veteran of the conservative movement (for years she organized and ran CPAC, the Woodstock for people who yearn to see Mike Pence up close or watch Ted Cruz do an acoustic set), Lisa gets it. But she also gets life – her book Finding Mr. Righteous was an eye-opening and, at times, agonizingly honest look at a young woman's journey in modern America, specifically the conservative world. She knows how to write about people with a particular identity without making it about that identity, so she's the perfect choice to go after nimrods who are nothing but their chosen identity. " . . .

Trump says he's decided what to do with Iran nuclear agreement - but won't say what he decided . . .

. . . as Iran says it is ready to jump start nuke activities if the deal comes apart

UK Daily Mail  " President Donald Trump said Wednesday he has reached a decision on the fate of the Iran nuclear deal negotiated under President Barack Obama - but not what it is. 

"A day after he called that deal, reached along with Iran and five other countries an 'embarrassment,' Trump faced questions about his intentions following a meeting with Jordan's King Abdullah outside the United Nations General Assembly. 

" 'I have decided,' Trump said when asked about his plans for the deal. He repeated the statement three times. 

"Pressed on what his decision was, Trump smiled and said: 'I'll let you know what the decision is.' . . .