Saturday, September 21, 2024

This Is the Most Deliciously Devious Part About Israel's Exploding Pager Attacks

 Victoria Taft – PJ Media 

"When you start feeling sorry for these guys, just remember what their Hezbollah buddies did to families, babies, and women on October 7, and then you'll snap right out of it. And Israel literally made them pay for their own deaths." 


 Israel knows they are on their own, given what Democrats have become now. The party of AOC, Tlaib, MSNBC, and Harris has a new love for the Kaffiyeh-clad anarchists in our streets. The same graces Harris gave to Antifa she will provide to these useful idiots. TD

"Now we're learning more details of the attacks, and they're as impressive as they are diabolical. 

"Three thousand beepers exploded this week, killing a bunch of Hezbollah terrorists and some innocents. Iran's ambassador to Lebanon lost an eye in the attack. 

"After that attack, Hezbollah began using walkie-talkies, and they exploded. 

"When the terrorists decided to meet in person in Lebanon Friday, someone bombed the meeting. 

"Israel has not confirmed it carried out the attacks, nor is it likely they will ever lay claim to them, but U.S. intelligence officials who talked to their favorite intelligence mouthpiece, the New York Times, claimed Israel pulled it off. Time will tell what the truth is.

"This operation has obviously been planned for quite some time. Though Israeli intelligence agencies were completely caught off guard by Hezbollah's Iran-backed October 7 attack, they appear to be trying to make up for that huge intelligence debacle. 

"Defense One reports that Hezbollah had a deal with a Taiwan company, Gold Apollo, to supply the Islamic supremacist terror organization with pagers. Someone probably needs to have a little chat with the Taiwan company that sells AR-924 pagers to terrorists, but they told whoever asked that they weren't responsible for the pagers. 

"They pointed the finger of blame at a Hungarian firm called BAC Consulting KFT. This appears to be a shell company run by friendly or Israeli intelligence. Indeed, multiple Israeli cutouts may have been involved in the manufacturing and sales of the devices. 

"The Times reports that Israel "did not tamper with the Hezbollah devices that exploded, defense and intelligence officials say. It manufactured them as part of an elaborate ruse."

"That's right. The shell company sold the rigged pagers manufactured by the good guys. 

"And this is the best part of the story—if you hate Islamo-Nazi terrorists, anyway—Hezbollah paid for its own rigged and exploding pagers." . . .

Elon Musk Predicts Dems Will Import, Legalize Enough Migrants to Ensure 'Permanent One-Party Rule' if Harris Wins 2024 Election

 Jordyn M. (resistthemainstream.com)

"He recently warned about Democrats wanting to scrap first amendment rights in America, following a shocking video of Walz arguing that “there is no guarantee” to “free speech” on so-called “misinformation or hate speech.” "


"Elon Musk does not want Vice President Kamala Harris to become President of the United States.

"The tech mogul has been a vocal critic of Harris and supporter of Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump, citing Democrats’ plot to grant illegal immigrants “a pathway to citizenship” as one of his biggest concerns.

"Musk detailed his latest prediction for what Harris would do if elected on X, warning his followers of the staggering “a one-party rule” possibility.

“ 'My prediction is that if Kamala wins, the Dems will import and legalize enough migrants to ensure a permanent one-party rule that is increasingly socialist (to a confiscatory level) and repressive,” Musk claimed.  He continued: “Everywhere will be California, but worse.”

“The one thing that gives California pause is that people can move to other states. What would happen if all states were ruled like California? Nowhere to move.” . . .

Friday, September 20, 2024

Sizing up Kamala

Biden-Harris border official claims cover-up as he was allegedly ordered to hide release of migrants (NY Post)   "The former Border Patrol official responsible for securing nearly 1,000 miles of America’s frontier has charged that the Biden-Harris administration intentionally covered up the ongoing migrant crisis.

"Ex-San Diego Sector Chief Agent Aaron Heitke told members of the House Homeland Security Committee on Wednesday that the White House repeatedly tried to “quiet the border-wide crisis” by shielding information from the press and concealing crossings by dangerous migrants with terror ties.

“ 'I had to release illegal aliens by the hundreds each day into communities who could not support them,” testified Heitke, who retired in summer 2023 and appeared voluntarily before the panel." . . . 

In other portions of his testimony, Heitke said administration officials asked that he move more than
 2,000 migrants caught in between the US-Mexico border fences “out of the sight of the media.”

Kamala Harris Tells Oprah She Would Shoot Anyone Trying to Break into Her Home, Sparking Conservative Outrage

 “Probably should not have said that,” Harris said as laughter filled the room. “But my staff will deal with that later.” 

"Harris’ comment comes as she has been heavily ridiculed for her radical stance on guns." .... "At last week’s debate, Harris announced that she and her running mate Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz owned guns and insisted that they were not trying to take “anybody’s guns away,” Fox News reported.

"Yesterday, Resist the Mainstream reported that a video had resurfaced showing then DA Harris telling citizens of San Francisco that law enforcement would invade the locked homes of gun owners to make sure they were “being responsible.”... 

Revolver News

Dana Bash ROASTS Kamala Harris: Even CNN Calls Out Her Babbling "CNN anchor Dana Bash laid into Vice President Kamala Harris, saying that some of the Democratic presidential candidate’s talking points were repetitive enough to inspire a “drinking game.” She's so bad that she's losing the journalist who treated her with kid gloves." 

Rigged Debate: Harris Had Much More Help Than Viewers Noticed That Night

 American Free News Network (substack.com)   "Anyone who watched even the first thirty minutes of the September 10th “debate” between Donald J. Trump and Kamala Harris could tell the “moderators” were bending over backwards to help Harris."


"The entire affidavit can be accessed in the link below. Here, I will provide you with the key provisions in this unethical agreement, without which Harris threatened she would cancel the debate:

  1. They agreed that Trump, and only Trump, would be fact-checked LIVE, during the debate. I can only assume ABC had hundreds of fact-checkers in the back room because Muir & Davis received the texts from them within seconds of Trump saying something.
  2. “The Harris campaign was provided with sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar topics that would appear during the debate.”
  3. This special agreement was hidden from the Trump campaign.
  4. “The Harris campaign-imposed restrictions included:

A) No questions about Joe Biden’s health;

B) No questions about her tenure as “Attorney General in San Francisco” (I think the affidavit writer is confusing her years as California AG in Sacramento and her earlier years as San Francisco DA); and

C) No questions about her brother-in-law, Tony West, who is facing charges of embezzling billions in taxpayer funds and who may be in her administration if Democrats can successfully rig another presidential election." . . .

Why Do Media Think Democrats Are Worth Cheating For?

  Issues & Insights (issuesinsights.com)

There are no ideologues in the West like those who pose as objective reporters and editors. At times some have internal struggles with the real journalist within. But the propagandist always wins. 

"It would be helpful to voters to know that a “whistleblower” says ABC rigged last week’s debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. But outside of conservative media, it’s being largely ignored, because the legacy press covers its own and as zealously as it does the Democratic Party. Whether the claims are true or not – the existence of the whistleblower remains unconfirmed – the mainstream media’s loyalty to Democrats is uncomfortably similar to the relationship Pravda had with the Central Committee of the Soviet Union’s Communist Party.

"To quickly recap, the unnamed whistleblower said ABC agreed to fact-check Trump while ensuring “Harris would not face comparable scrutiny.” The plan was so detailed that “various people were assigned to fact check observations it was perceived candidate Trump would make during the debate.”

“In fact,” says the whistleblower, the “Harris campaign required assurances that Donald Trump would be fact-checked.”

These agreements were reached on calls that the Trump campaign was not a part of although all discussions regarding the rules and negotiations were supposed to include both sides.

The affidavit also says Harris was provided with sample questions that, while not the exact questions that would be asked, nevertheless “covered similar topics that would appear during the debate.”

There were also issues that could not be raised – Joe Biden’s health; Harris’ performance as San Francisco’s district attorney; her brother-in-law and “key campaign adviser” Tony West, who allegedly “fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers” – since they would reflect poorly on Harris.

“I have observed a pronounced bias against Donald Trump within ABC News,” the affiant continues, while also noting “many” ABC employees “questioned the clear bias that is well known throughout the company.”

Guess Who Could Be Coming Back If Kamala Wins?


 
Katie Pavlich (townhall.com)   "
We're just 47 days away from Election Day and talk about who would fill the Cabinet for either President Donald Trump or President Kamala Harris is heating up. 

"During an interview this week, former Secretary of State and twice failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton hinted at a comeback should Harris win. She's making herself readily available in an "unofficial" capacity during the final weeks of the election." 

 "Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump plans to put Elon Musk and RFK Jr. is his Cabinet, or other high profile and powerful federal government positions, should he be victorious in November." . . .

Speaking of Elon Musk: Elon Musk relocates X headquarters to Bastrop, Texas

Tech billionaire Elon Musk has reportedly confirmed the location of the new headquarters for X, formerly known as Twitter, in Central Texas after announcing the move from sunny California to temperamental Texas earlier this year. 

Joe Biden, 20 Years Ago, Blocked the Potential First Black Female on the Supreme Court

 Larry Elder (townhall.com)  

"Were it not for Biden, who now considers the filibuster "a relic of the Jim Crow era," [Sunny] Hostin could have been "crying with pride" 20 years ago."
File photo

. . ."California Supreme Court Justice Janice Rogers Brown did not set out to become the first black female nominated to the United States Supreme Court. But had it not been for then-Sen. Joe Biden standing in her way 20 years ago, Brown might well have been on the road to "breaking this ceiling."

"Brown, the daughter and granddaughter of sharecroppers, was born in Alabama during Jim Crow. As a single mom, she worked her way through college and law school, graduating from UCLA law school in 1977. Over the next 20 years, she worked in the criminal and civil divisions as California deputy attorney general; became the general counsel for the California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency; served as a law professor; and practiced law in private practice.

"In 1994, California Republican Gov. Pete Wilson appointed her to the California Court of Appeals and two years later to the California Supreme Court. In California, appointees to its Supreme Court must run for reelection. Despite being appointed by a Republican and her reputation as a conservative jurist, she retained her position with 76% of the vote, a higher percentage than any of the other appointees who ran that year. Brown wrote more majority opinions than any other justice of that court.

"In 2003, President George W. Bush nominated her to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, from which more justices go on the Supreme Court than any other circuit. Even though Brown had majority support in the Senate, Sen. Biden filibustered her nomination. According to columnist Robert Novak, Biden's obstruction represented "the first full-scale effort in American history to prevent a president from picking the federal judges he wants.' " 

"Bush renominated her and she was finally confirmed, with Biden again opposing her confirmation. Months later, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor retired, and Brown was reportedly on the short list to replace her. But Biden appeared on CBS' "Face the Nation" and threatened to again filibuster a Brown nomination. Bush backed down."  (Emphasis mine. TD)

California’s Crackdown On AI-Generated Political Parody Is Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Says

 Jane Coleman (legalinsurrection.com)  

"Lawyers: “Mr. Reagan’s satire videos, which have garnered millions of views, are precisely the kind of speech that the First Amendment was designed to protect.' ”


"A creator of viral political parody videos is suing California officials over new laws restricting AI-generated content like his from being posted and shared online.

"The legislation took on political urgency over the summer after Governor Gavin Newsom called one of the videos “illegal.”

"In July, the YouTuber known as “Mr. Reagan” released a parody Kamala Harris campaign ad, featuring AI-generated cuts that sound just like her. But you know you’re watching a spoof when “Harris” says things like, “I may not know the first thing about running the country, but remember, that’s a good thing if you’re a deep state puppet.” Or that she’s been selected because she’s “the ultimate diversity hire and a person of color, so if you criticize anything [she] say[s], you’re both sexist and racist.”

"The video caught the attention of someone who knows creative genius when he sees it, Elon Musk.

"He called it “amazing”:   

"Once Musk retweeted it, the brilliant satire also caught the attention of California Governor Gavin Newsom.

"And, according to the lawsuit, even though “Mr. Reagan’s” YouTube video acknowledges its content is “digitally generated” and even though it is labeled “parody,” Newsom was not amused.

"The video was too “real”: “Manipulating a voice in an ‘ad’ like this one should be illegal,” Newsom warned in a tweet two days later. “I’ll be signing a bill in a matter of weeks to make sure it is”: . . ."

Did Elite Colleges Lie to the Supreme Court or Are They Breaking the Law Today?

 Even After Court Ruling, Colleges Face Questions on Admissions (Hans von Spakovsky) 

"As it turns out, the schools have had no trouble attaining what they call “diverse” student bodies; that is, a student body where fewer Asian American students get in than deserve to." We have become a silly people indeed. TD


"When the U.S. Supreme Court issued its monumental decision in 2023 telling colleges and universities that “yes,” they did have to comply with the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment in their admissions policies, the question immediately arose of whether they would comply or cheat.

"With the latest admission numbers from schools such as Duke, Princeton, and Yale, however, we still don’t know the answer.

"In June of 2023, in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and the University of North Carolina, the Supreme Court held that the academy had to end its pernicious policy of discriminating on the basis of race in deciding whether to admit students. The colleges argued they need to discriminate to achieve “diversity,” a practice based, as Chief Justice John Roberts said, on the “offensive and demeaning assumption that [students] of a particular race, because of their race, think alike.' ”  . . .

Is there no knowledge of our history of treating Asians during WW2? Maybe there once was a statue commemorating all that which was torn down by those low-information youths. I can visualize that. TD

Kamala Harris Has a Plan – To Take, Take, Take

 John Green - American Free News Network

"The fact is, the wealthy don’t have enough loot to pick up Kamala’s tab. If she want’s to cover her “investment” with taxes, she’ll have to take it from all of us."


"I watched the debate and … oh boy. Pay no attention to whether:

  • Donald Trump lost his cool – he did,
  • Kamala Harris sounded annoying – she did, or
  • The moderators shamelessly took sides – did they ever.

"None of that matters because the clouds parted, the sun broke through, and Kamala informed us that for the first time in her campaign, she has a plan. Her campaign isn’t just about saving democracy anymore. She’s going to save the economy too – by creating an “opportunity economy.” Apparently “opportunity” came in 2nd to “joy” in the focus group testing.

"She even told us how she’s going to create that “opportunity economy.” She’s going to give away stuff. Who would have thought a Democrat had such a capacity for out-of-the-box creativity.

  • "She’s going to give new parents $6,000 so they can afford a new baby crib – which given the current rate of inflation sounds about right.
  • "She’s going to give new homeowners $25,000 to offset the skyrocketing mortgage rates she created – for a couple of years anyway.
  • "She’s going to give new business startups $50,000 to replace some of the mom-and-pop venture capital lost when she and Joe shuttered their businesses for a virus.

"That’s it. That’s her plan: spend, spend, spend – sorry, give, give, give.

"There’s just one teeny-tiny little thing that Kamala didn’t get to with all of her planning – the other side of the equation. Money out must equal money in. She didn’t explain where she’s going to get the money for all of her generous giving.

"Had the moderators thought to ask how she’s going to pay for it, I’m sure Kamala would have screeched “It’s an investment!” When Kamala says government spending is an investment, she’s claiming it will pay for itself by stimulating the economy, and creating more taxpayers – like baby crib manufacturers. She claims that government “investment” raises revenue just like the Inflation Reduction Act did. Oops … I wonder if the moderators would have fact checked that?" . . .

Irony! Israel struck Hezb’allah in their instruments of rape.

 

RealityBites

The karma in Lebanon is too strong! -Lynne Lechter   
Yet one couldn’t help but chortle at the karma of the latest Israeli attacks: after eleven months of the worst attack against Jews since the Holocaust, Israel struck back in an extremely fitting manner.  They struck Hezb’allah in their instruments of rape.  And they used the least high-tech gadget liable to execute the attacks: the pager.

Tiny Israel flips the tables of warfare itself on the terrorists of Hezb'allah - Monica Showalter   . . ."And that calls to mind what Israel is: The tech genius of the Middle East, the nation that gave us drip irrigation, computer processor chips, metal detectors, heart rate monitors from hospital beds, devices that can extract air for divers underwater, safe drinking water detectors, cell phones, safe-navigation technology for cars on the road, precision robots for spinal surgery, oh, and pagers, too. This list here is mind-blowing, I've heard Google guys call them the brains of their company.

"With that going on, while Hezb'allah and other miserable creatures of the Middle East stewing in Jew-hatred and fist-waving instead of trying to match them in intellectual creativity, innovation, and tech prowess, this Israeli advantage of being on the developer side is finally being put to work for Israel." . . .

Heaven help Israel if they ever elect leaders like Biden,Pelosi, and Harris. Their very existence can be threatened when America puts Democrats over her government. TD


Billionaire Hedge Fund Manager Reveals His Plan If Harris Versus Trump Wins the Election

 Elizabeth Allen​ - TFPP Wire  

 "John Paulson, a hedge fund billionaire and prominent Trump supporter, announced that he would withdraw his investments from the market if Vice President Kamala Harris wins the upcoming presidential election. During an interview on FOX Business, Paulson expressed concerns over Harris’ economic policies, which he believes could lead to widespread market instability.

"He emphasized that her proposed tax increases would lead to significant sell-offs and potentially trigger a recession. Paulson stated, “I’d be very concerned if Harris is elected and pursues the tax plans and other economic plans that she articulated.”

Key Facts:

  • John Paulson, a major Trump fundraiser, stated he would pull his money out of the market if Kamala Harris wins the presidential election.
  • Harris has proposed raising the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28% and increasing capital gains taxes.
  • Paulson is particularly concerned about Harris’ plan to tax unrealized gains for individuals making $100 million or more, predicting this would lead to mass sell-offs.
  • Paulson highlighted that Trump’s economic plans, including extending the 2017 tax cuts, are vastly different from Harris’ policies.
  • He suggested that market uncertainty under Harris would cause him to invest in cash and gold instead.

The Rest of The Story:

"John Paulson, known for his massive profit from predicting the subprime mortgage crisis, voiced strong concerns over the potential impact of a Kamala Harris presidency on the U.S. economy. Appearing on FOX Business’ “The Claman Countdown,” Paulson outlined his fears that Harris’ proposed tax policies, particularly those targeting high earners, would cause instability in financial markets. He pointed to Harris’ plan to raise the corporate tax rate to 28% and her push for higher capital gains taxes as signals of what he sees as an economically damaging agenda.

“ 'I’d be very concerned if Harris is elected and pursues the tax plans and other economic plans that she articulated,” . . .