Wednesday, August 27, 2025

How Obama doomed Democrats

 Don Surber

"Obama insisted on putting his party on the 20 side of 80/20 issues. Democrats are pro-criminals, pro-illegal aliens, pro-child mutilation and against anything and everything that Trump does."

"The New York Times is running a series of stories aimed at sparking Democrats after their second defeat by Donald Trump despite outspending him and owning all the media. NYT fears he’s the iceberg that hit their Titanic that for most of this century ran the country.
"NYT reported, “How the Electoral College Could Tilt Further From Democrats.
"The concern of the moment is over the 2030 Census which will reflect California’s loss of actual citizens to middle class flight and the deportation of the illegal aliens that Democrats use to fluff their population totals. They literally were replacing Americans with immigrants as they tried to maintain an Electoral College advantage that California does not deserve.

President Trump is deporting that plan." . . .

"Obama used his power to force the Little Sisters of the Poor to fight for their First Amendment right not to dispense artificial birth control to their employees.

"I’m not saying he is a pervert, but he used his power to finance the butchery of children in the name of transgendering.

"The first black president made life miserable for everyone by dividing us by race, sex and sex life.

"He used the FBI to spy on Donald Trump and likely many others as Susan Rice spent her time as the nation’s spy chief “unmasking”—that is identifying—Americans in what were supposed to be FBI recordings of foreign nationals.

"But Obama’s worst sin for Democrats was hanging on to power by becoming the first ex-president to live in DC to watch his moles in government work against his successor. For four years, he harassed President Trump with false investigations, phony baloney lawsuits and ludicrous impeachments.

"Under Biden, Obama had Trump’s home raided by his buddies in the FBI. Obama’s minions charges him with 91 counts of crimes that existed, as he said, “in the imagination.” . . . More.

Here’s why Democrats work so hard to defend criminals   . . . "Obama is an intelligent person who morphed Saul Alinsky, Marx, Critical Theory, and anarchy into a legitimate political movement.  Although it was successful in his personal ascension to power, this approach has not generally gained ground nationally.  (It is well received in the large urban cities with large minority populations.)  The movement toward radicalism includes a reduction in policing and punishment for crimes.  This results in chaos which threatens the local poor and minority population most giving them a sense of hopelessness and desperation.  This is critical to the theory.  Hence, these political leaders will resist any attempt to make our streets safer." . . .

DNC's Botched Israel Vote Proves Democrat Party Has the Moral Backbone of a Chocolate Eclair

 RedState

"It's a race to the bottom amongst the so-called leaders of the Democrat Party, isn't it? It's hard to pick who's the weakest amongst the lot. On the one hand, there's Ken Martin, who's overseeing a party hemorrhaging both voters and cash. On the other hand, there's Hakeem Jeffries, Nancy Pelosi's hand-picked successor who's busy avoiding the topic of Zohran Mamdani. "

"For weeks, some in the left-leaning media have been hyping a looming showdown over Israel at the Democrat National Committee's summer meeting being held this week in Minneapolis, Minnesota. There were two dueling resolutions going head-to-head; one involved a two-state solution and arms sales, while the other called for an arms embargo and suspension of military aid.

"This was it! The big moment when Democrats were finally going to decide if they side with the antisemites rampaging across college campuses—who, let's face it, are the face of today's Democrat Party—or with those who at least pay lip service to continuing with arms sales to Israel with the goal of eventually arriving at a two-state solution. 

"Here's how one outlet framed the fight:

But the twin Gaza resolutions have substantial differences. One urges a ceasefire and a return of hostages held by Hamas; the other asks the party to commit to “suspension of military aid to Israel” and its elected leaders to support establishing a Palestinian state.

That resolution would be a “gift to Republicans” and would “embolden Israel’s adversaries,” Democratic Majority for Israel president Brian Romick told Semafor.

"Well, Tuesday was vote day, and they totally botched it. It's kind of insane what happened.

"First, the DNC resolutions committee rejected the measure calling to suspend arms sales to Israel. Okay, so that might indicate that enough party members still support Israel, meaning the second resolution had a good chance of being approved. We'll never know, however, because DNC Chairman Ken Martin, the author of the pro-Israel resolution, proceeded to pull it from consideration, saying the party needs to "keep working through" the issue.

"In the words of my husband's favorite band: if you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice. The DNC made a choice, and it's a pretty obvious one: don't tick off the green-haired freaks and racist sign wavers that are the base of our party. We don't like them when they're mad (and they're always mad, especially when it comes to Israel)." . . .

"Hundreds of “radicalized” students ran rampant through the halls of Hillcrest High School in Jamaica, Queens, for nearly two hours this past Monday, prompted by a teacher’s attendance at a pro-Israel rally. The teacher herself had to hide during the rampage to avoided being lynched.

"The controversy centered around the teacher’s Facebook profile photo, which displayed her at a pro-Israel rally on October 9th, holding a poster declaring, “I stand with Israel.” . . .

I fear Democrat rule can turn the United States into Scotland:

Scotland Police Charge Teen Girl Seen In Viral Alleged Attempted Migrant Assault    . . . "Of all of Europe, Britain stands out as a country that has adopted a policy of appeasing immigrants and bashing any natives with the gall to speak up for themselves." . . .

Just two days ago, this horror show flashed across X. The location is Dundee, Scotland. Two girls, one age 12 and the other 14, are pursued by a number of migrants who remain off-screen.

Fourteen-Year-Old Scottish Girl Arrested for Resisting Probable Assault by Migrants   Remember what people like these did to women in Oct 7th Israel?


Abigail Spanberger Says One Of Her First Moves As Governor Would Be Rolling Back Cooperation With ICE – IJR

Trump Says Self-Hating Jew George Soros And Son Should face RICO Charges

The Yeshiva World


"President Trump on Wednesday called for George Soros and his son to be charged under the federal RICO Act, accusing them of funding “violent protests” across the United States.

“ 'George Soros, and his wonderful Radical Left son, should be charged with RICO because of their support of Violent Protests, and much more, all throughout the United States of America,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.

"Trump further escalated his remarks, writing: “Soros, and his group of psychopaths, have caused great damage to our Country! That includes his Crazy, West Coast friends. Be careful, we’re watching you!”

“ 'Be careful, we’re watching you,” Trump added as a warning.

"The RICO Act, typically used to prosecute organized criminal enterprises such as illegal gambling operations and loan-sharking, can carry lengthy prison sentences.

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

Trump Calls For RICO Charges Against Soros Over Violent Protest Support; Gates Foundation Abruptly Severs Ties With Rogue Arabella Advisors  "The "dark money" network operated by Arabella Advisors has reportedly lost one of its top funding sources: a leftist billionaire's foundation."

"Equally significant in the news cycle this morning, President Trump stated on Truth Social that George Soros and his radical leftist son, Alex Soros, "should be charged with RICO because of their support of violent protests." . . .

 

. . . "Tracing the Arabella network's donors is tricky. But according to the NYT, the Gates Foundation has plowed $450 million into the network since 2008, which in turn funneled money into other nonprofit entities, ranging from radical leftist climate groups to abortion initiatives, and even supporting the permanent protest-industrial complex against President Trump." . . .Emphases in the original.

Tuesday, August 26, 2025

Entire Muslim Panel Definitely Didn’t See This Coming From Douglas Murray…

  Jewish Uncensored;   "Jewish Uncensored is not just a Youtube Channel Its a Movement. We are dedicated to giving you the LOUD UNCENSORED TRUTH about Everything Jewish. From Inspirational speeches to breaking News stories Jewish Uncensored has it all. The Jewish People have been Persecuted for Thousands of Years and we will NOT allow that to happen ever again. Most recently the israel Hamas war in Gaza has brought the Jewish people a fresh new wave of antisemitism the likes of which we've never seen before. The situation is getting worse by the day, but we won't let that happen. NEVER AGAIN is not a slogan it is a Promise. And, NEVER AGAIN is NOW! "

"The muslim tries to over talk or shout out the other person talking because they don't want the viewers hearing the truth.

"Muslims trying so hard to bully talk over Murray. But he as the adult in the room shuts down the radicals."

The Real Reason Jews Are Hated

 Gatestone Institute  

"Even trying to conduct the most moral war in history, and sending humanitarian aid to the Gazans trying to kill them, all of Israel's enemies consider themselves free of such constraints. (Someone asked if the British had ever sent aid to Germany in WWII.) As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu remarked, "the only ones who are being deliberately starved in Gaza are our hostages."


This is merely the outline of the entire article. The full text is here...

"Gavin Newsom Hates Californians, But He Sure Loves The Limelight"

  Issues & Insights  

"The only thing more astounding than Newsom’s disastrous tenure as governor is the fact that more than half of adults in the state approve of the job he’s been doing, and that he’s a serious contender among Democrats to run for president."


"There are two things you can be sure of when it comes to Gavin Newsom. One is that he craves power. Two, he hates his fellow Californians.

"OK, the second one might be a stretch. But considering what he’s done to the people of his home state, that’s a fairly reasonable conclusion to draw.

"Newsom has been making headlines these days by “getting tough” with President Donald Trump in ways childish (X with posts written in all caps) and politically poisonous (promising to redraw district boundaries to kill off four or five of the state’s nine Republican seats).

"With that latter move, Newsom once again shows his disdain for Californians, who voted twice – in 2008 and again in 2010 – against gerrymandering of this kind, appointing a bipartisan commission to draw district lines that are fair and equitable. Polls show most California voters oppose Newsom’s scheme to bypass this commission, but Newsom clearly hopes to bypass voters with an (expensive) special election that will attract mainly hard-core partisans.

"But this is hardly the worst of Newsom’s offenses against the people he governs.

"Since Newsom took the helm in 2019 and spent the next six years grooming himself for the presidency, the people of California have suffered.

"Some examples:" . . .This is just one; read more here...

. . . "Newsom spent years attacking oil companies to appease climate alarmists. As Politico noted:

He announced a ban on fracking in 2021 and signed a law that restricts oil drilling near sensitive sites like schools and hospitals. He also spearheaded a lawsuit to hold major oil companies liable for climate change damages and legislation to consider a cap on oil industry profits, while castigating the industry as a corrupt force fleecing Californians.

Now, California drivers face the possibility of gas prices topping $8 a gallon as two oil refineries in the state plan to shut down, and Newsom is scrambling to figure out how to undo the damage he’s caused."

What Made the Democratic Party Go Crazy?

Victor Davis Hanson   

Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were the last Democrats to go through the motions of appealing to the middle class. But in retirement, they both cashed in, went global, and became multimillionaires by selling their name and brand—and so joined the madness. 

"The answer was not Trump alone.

"Indeed, irony abounds when Democrats resonate with the claims of the vestigial Never Trumpers that the MAGA movement “hijacked” the Republican Party.

"In characteristic projectionist fashion, the left is simply falsely attributing to their opposition the very hijacking that hit the Democratic Party.

"The Republicans are still the party of conservatism and traditionalism. But in the last decade, it adopted an expansionary middle-class agenda that has led to record party registration, its first popular presidential vote victory since 2004, and control of all three branches of government.

"The MAGA emphases also have accomplished what prior “moderate” Republican presidents and presidential candidates had sought but largely failed to achieve: making inroads with minorities and youth and substituting class commonalities for racial chauvinism.

" 'Thus, in 2024, 55 percent of Hispanic men and somewhere around 25 percent of black males voted for Trump—along with a +2 advantage for Trump among young men in general (18-29).

"In contrast, Joe Biden left office with below 40 percent popularity in many polls. His replacement, 2024 Democratic nominee Kamala Harris, despite a substantial advantage in funding and overwhelmingly biased, favorable media coverage, lost both the popular and Electoral College vote.

"Since the election, a variety of data points show a steady erosion in Democrat Party favorability (24 percent positive polling) and voter registration (for the first time in memory, Republicans are out-registering hemorrhaging Democrats in new voter affiliations).

"They are also on the losing end of a 40/60 split among voters on most issues—especially the border, energy, crime, transgenderism, and foreign policy—a truth that even the legacy media cannot disguise.

"The Democratic implosion does not necessarily mean they will not win back the House in the next election. Historically, it is difficult for even an unpopular out-party not to pick up lots of House and Senate seats in an administration’s first midterm. But if Democrats capture at least the House, the vote will not be for their party’s policies or politicians as much as a reflection of their ginned-up opposition to Trump, the messenger of a radical and controversial counterrevolutionary message.

"The Democratic project is bleeding out because it either does not address what the middle class is worried about, or it offers no solution to popular anger—namely over inflation, the out-of-control DEI commissariat, illegal immigration, crime, high energy prices and tyrannical Green New Deal policies, steep interest rates, unaffordable housing costs, and anemic foreign policies." . . .   More...

Karma Comes Calling for John Bolton

The American Spectator   

"Apparently, without giving any thought to the possibility that Bolton might have committed a serious crime, they adopted the same moronic “retribution” narrative peddled by the crack reporters at Slate and Salon:" . . .

Rich Terrell

"On August 8, 2022 about 30 FBI agents descended on Donald Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago and searched the place with less civility than they would have afforded a Miami drug lord. They spent most of that day rummaging through Trump’s personal belongings — and those of his wife and son — allegedly in search of classified documents. This was the first time in American history that such an outrage had been committed against any former president. Yet it was greeted with thinly disguised glee by Trump’s critics, including erstwhile National Security Advisor John Bolton.
"Friday morning at 7 a.m., Bolton learned what it feels like to have the FBI appear at one’s front door with a search warrant. Later that day, federal agents also searched his D.C. office. According to a report in the New York Post, a senior U.S. official said the FBI is investigating Bolton’s use of a private email to send national security documents to family members. This official alleged, “While Bolton was a national security adviser, he was literally stealing classified information, utilizing his family as a cutout.” This is a profoundly ironic development considering Bolton’s frequent and caustic public comments about President Trump and the Mar-a-Lago raid.
"After that event, Bolton appeared on MSNBC to inveigh against Trump and his attitude concerning classified material: “I don’t think he cared about the classification system, I don’t think he appreciated the sensitivity of this information.” Oddly enough, he was utterly unconcerned about the dangerous precedent set by an FBI raid on a former president’s home: “It’s important that everybody take a deep breath here. This is a very serious matter. And it would be better if we could let the legal process play out.” It did “play out,” of course, when federal judge Aileen M. Cannon  dismissed the classified documents case against Trump.
"Inevitably the corporate news media have reacted quite differently to the Mar-a-Lago and Bolton raids. In the former case the major outlets often refused to call it a “raid.” The Washington Post, for example, ran countless pieces like this one in which the FBI “search” of Trump’s home was characterized as relatively routine: “It’s important to note that there is no reason to think the FBI’s action was triggered by politics.” On the other hand, the Post’s editorial about the bureau’s surprise visit to Bolton’s house uses the “R” word in its headline: “FBI raid targeting Bolton crosses a line in the Trump revenge campaign.” It goes downhill from there:" . . . More...

Rep. Eric Swalwell Threatens To Doxx Masked ICE Agents If Dems Regain House

 Legal Insurrection 

 "He knows he would be putting ICE Agents and their families in mortal danger if he does what he threatens to do. He doesn’t care."
 

. . . "On August 16, 2025, Swalwell threatened that if Democrats regain control of the House in 2026, they will “unmask” ICE agents who wear masks to conceal their identities to protect them from from gangs and antifa-types.

I want this to be absolutely clear — these masked men — roaming around like bank robber bandits — will be unmasked in a Democratic majority. Literally and figuratively. There will be accountability for the terror they’ve brought to our communities.

It’s all coming out.

"You hear that, ICE agents? If Democrats come back to power they will dox you so cartels can go after your families and try to put you in prison. https://t.co/3i5mqfqneK pic.twitter.com/Ka7SRyXKXe" . . .  More...

From the comments to this post: 

He made these statements outside the Well of the House. No speech and debate clause protection. When the House reconvenes the Speaker should put forth a censure motion for Swallows Well. Once passed he should be stripped of all committee assignments. The only way to stop this type of abhorrent behavior is to punish it to the maximum allowed by House rules.

Counterpoint:

  Not true. This is not Westminster; the speech and debate clause extends to anything a congressman does in the course of his role as a legislator, and it also extends to his staffers.


Monday, August 25, 2025

Facing up to Black Crime in America

We owe it to every victim, in every community, to stop pretending reality doesn’t exist. Truth isn’t racist. Statistics aren’t bigoted.

The American Spectator 

"That doesn’t mean blackness equals criminality, and it doesn’t excuse crude stereotypes. But it does expose the flaw in the narrative that poverty or inequality alone explains crime. Something deeper, something cultural, institutional, and uncomfortable, is at play. Until we admit this, we’ll keep watching the same cycle of violence repeat." 

"A woman named Holly from Cincinnati was recently knocked unconscious by a sucker punch at a jazz festival. The attack was caught on video. I had the misfortune of watching it. Perhaps you did too. The video went viral

"And for once, maybe the first time in decades, a white victim of black violence spoke honestly about what happened to her. She called it racially motivated. She didn’t apologize for existing. She didn’t beg people not to notice patterns. This represents a seismic shift in American discourse. For 60 years, we’ve been trapped in a suffocating ritual where white victims must immediately genuflect before the altar of racial sensitivity, even as they’re being wheeled into ambulances. They apologize for their attackers. They beg the media not to mention race. They perform elaborate acts of contrition for crimes committed against them.

"The script is always identical: “I don’t want this to become about race.” “They were probably just having a bad day.” “This could have happened to anyone.” What look like organic responses from trauma victims are often coached performances designed to protect a narrative that’s destroying lives.

"It’s time to face a simple truth: discussing black-on-white crime isn’t racism. It’s reality, and reality doesn’t bend to our feelings or our carefully crafted fairytales. Black-on-white crime exists. In fact, according to National Crime Victimization Survey, blacks commit 85 percent of all non-lethal interracial violence between blacks and whites.

"Let me be absolutely clear. This isn’t about defending one race or condemning another. It’s about the lives of Americans — black, white, and every shade between — who are left to live with the consequences. Crime that cuts across every racial line exists. If we treat the problem as taboo, we stay silent while the damage spreads.

"The numbers tell a story that makes many people deeply uncomfortable. Violent crime is not evenly distributed across America. Certain communities commit violent offenses at rates dramatically higher than others. The standard deflections don’t hold water anymore. “It’s about poverty,” we’re told. But poverty alone can’t explain why some of the poorest regions in the United States aren’t the most violent. Appalachia, for instance, is home to some of the most economically deprived white communities in the country. Yet violent crime rates there remain far lower than in cities like St. Louis, Baltimore, or Detroit. Poor whites, poor Asians, and poor Hispanics live with the same lack of money. They live with the same struggles with addiction, the same crumbling schools. But they don’t commit violent crimes at anywhere near the same rates.

" 'It’s about inequality,” we’re told. Yet America is filled with ethnic groups who arrived with nothing and endured discrimination without turning to thuggery. One needn’t discount blacks’ unique history of subjugation in the U.S. to recognize that immigrants from East Asia, South Asia, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe all faced bigotry and barriers. Many began in low-wage jobs, struggling with broken English, packed into unsafe neighborhoods where survival itself was a daily battle. But these communities didn’t become epicenters of violent crime. They endured, they built. They climbed, without turning their streets into warzones." . . .More...

Why Won't Politicians Stop Dropping the F-bomb?

 Ian Haworth  

"At this point, all they have left is "f—- Trump." Nothing of substance, nothing of character, nothing based in adult reality."

"There was a time when political rhetoric had at least the vague appearance of dignity, while our elected officials focused on kissing babies, pretending to enjoy gas station burritos and using language best suited for a mild-mannered sermon on Sunday morning. Politicians — love them or hate them — at least tried to speak in ways that aimed to inspire or persuade.

"Today? That's been replaced with a lazy, foul-mouthed shortcut, where the F-bomb is being dropped like there's no tomorrow. Celebrities and politicians alike have discovered what they think is a magic tool — drop the F-bomb, cue the applause and watch the social media clips go viral. From podiums in Congress to late-night TV, it's become almost routine.

" 'No f—-ing way," Sen. Chuck Schumer announced in response to Donald Trump's attempt to restore law and order to Washington, D.C. "Who cares about the f—-ing rules right now," declared professional-failure Beto O'Rourke, "Win some f—-ing power." "Yep. When ICE is around, I will alert my community to stay out of the area, and I'm not f—-ing scared of you nor Trump's masked goons," posted an Arizona state senator.

"Even outgoing so-called late-night "comedian" Stephen Colbert got in on the act: "How dare you, sir? Would an untalented man be able to compose the following satirical witticism? Go f—- yourself."

"I guess we'll never know why Stephen Colbert got fired ...

"Make no mistake: As a Brit, I'm not unaccustomed to using the odd four-letter one-syllable word to hammer my point home. But there are a few crucial differences. First, it's just funnier in a British accent. Second, I'm not a member of Congress, nor am I standing at the forefront of the anti-Trump "return to civility" nonsense that supposedly formed the foundation of the post-Obama Democratic Party!

"In this case, the problem isn't even that these F-bombs are crude or beneath the office of our elected officials. The real problem is that these people think this is what connects them to "the people" they are obsessively trying to woo.

"Somehow, they genuinely believe that being vulgar makes them authentic. In reality, it's quite the opposite. At this point, all they have left is "f—- Trump." Nothing of substance, nothing of character, nothing based in adult reality. It's just low-IQ political Mad Libs: fill in your outrage with profanity, get a round of clapter and carry on with the same vacuous talking points." . . .

More...    Ian Haworth is a political commentator known for using facts, logic and a hint of British humor to fight for true conservative values. A speaker with Young America's Foundation and Turning Point USA, he first moved to the United States from the United Kingdom after graduating from Oxford University with a bachelor’s and master’s degree in computer science. While working at Facebook as a software engineer on their misinformation team, Ian started to speak out against anti-conservative bias in Silicon Valley, as well as the rise of antisemitism.

Why the Cracker Barrel Logo Matters

 American Greatness

Rich Terrell toon added by TD

"One of the unique and pleasant aspects of writing for American Greatness is that it allows its columnists to compose the titles/headlines that appear above their columns. Most publications don’t do that. A copy editor writes the headline and slaps it on the piece, sometimes with unintended results. Readers tend to judge a column by its title even more than they judge a book by its cover—and the latter is the clichรฉ of all clichรฉs for a reason. I can’t tell you the number of times over the years that I’ve seen readers upset with a columnist (or even a reporter) about something he didn’t write and over which he had no control, all because a copy editor got creative or tried to be clever or took too many liberties with the content of a column. That’s not usually a problem here at American Greatness.
"I point this out today for a reason, namely, because I’m going to need you to bear with me for a second. I wrote the headline/title on this column, and so, I know what it says. I also know that what you’re about to read may seem to contradict that headline. Actually, it contradicts the headline directly. But as I say, hang with me for a bit.
"So, the new Cracker Barrel logo redesign is irrelevant. It doesn’t matter. Sure, the new logo is bland. It’s uninteresting. It disconnects the company from its history. And it was almost certainly the result of a collaboration between unimaginative Cracker Barrel executives who are disengaged from their company’s customer base and equally unimaginative outside consultants who have probably never eaten at one of the restaurants, much less talked to its patrons. The redesign will appeal to few, if any, and will do nothing to help the company. But then…so what? It’s just a logo, after all. Who cares? In the grand scheme of things, it’s hardly worth the outrage. If it hadn’t been pointed out on social media, and if a handful of conservative influencers hadn’t stirred up indignation over the change, 99.99% of Americans never would have noticed it, and even those who did wouldn’t have allowed it to raise their blood pressure. The bottom line is that in and of itself, the Cracker Barrel logo redesign is a non-story. The very idea that anyone should care about it is just more “boob bait for Bubbas,” as the late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan used to say about overhyped Clinton scandals." ... More...

Comment to the above: "I love Cracker Barrel’s(sp) and its menu. What I noticed is the work ethic. If you get there when they first open in the morning and it’s not too busy you might try to converse with some of the employees. I do. Ask them how long they have been working there. Many have worked for over a decade. They like their jobs which means the company, at least at mid-level, is doing something right."