Sunday, October 26, 2025

How can Mamdani teach New York if electing de Blasio didn't"

"Mamdani is a national security threat. He should be investigated for his brash support for jihadism and his dangerous affiliations. He belongs on a terror watchlist, not in a mayoral race in the city where ideas like his flew into its buildings on September 11, 2001." . . . CF

American Thinker

 Defund Mamdani

. . . "This is the largest police department in the United States, with nearly 34,000 uniformed officers, but it is still understaffed. Proud men and women in blue with 20 or more years of service are expected to submit their retirement papers should Mamdani be elected. These dedicated officers will not want to work for a mayor who tweeted on October 23, 2020, “We need to elect a socialist city council to defund the NYPD.” . . .

 The Shadow of Terror: Zohran Mamdani’s Radical Islam Problem  "New York City’s 2025 mayoral race has thrust Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist and New York State Assembly member, into the spotlight as the Democratic nominee. His candidacy, while historic as potentially the first Muslim and Indian-American mayor, raises serious concerns due to his (1) adherence to the Shi’a Twelver sect, (2) support of Hamas jihadist terrorists and its parent group, the Muslim Brotherhood, (3) rabid antisemitism, and (4) devastating economic implications of his socialist policies. Mamdani’s candidacy is a natural result of decades of failed NYC policies toward Islamists and jihadists, which have almost turned the city into a Muslim Brotherhood sanctuary. Mamdani’s candidacy is a symptom of a larger Islamist problem in NYC.

"While many American Muslims in New York City are patriotic and capable of great leadership, Mamdani’s religious and ideological stances demand scrutiny. Mamdani wants to rule New York City, but who rules Mamdani?

"New York City is home to over half a million Muslims, many of whom contribute significantly to the city’s vibrant fabric. Numerous Muslim leaders possess the vision, integrity, and capability to serve as mayor, championing policies that align with American values and the U.S. Constitution; however, Mamdani is not among them. He belongs on a terror watchlist and not in a mayoral race." . . .  More...

Cynthia Farahat is the bestselling author of The Secret Apparatus: The Muslim Brotherhood’s Industry of Death.

Saturday, October 25, 2025

Y’all, All Y’all, and the Quest for a Second-Person Plural Pronoun

My wife's family, coming from Arkansas roots, would use "Y'uns" for "Y'all" TD

Word Smarts  

"However you spell it, and however many people you’re referring to when you use it, “y’all” is a versatile and, some would say, better alternative to “you guys” or “you.' ”


"In the United States, “you guys” is one of the most commonly used second-person pronoun references, but “y’all” is all the rage. While “y’all” is still heard primarily in the Southern United States and nationwide in African American Vernacular English (AAVE), its usage has been on a dramatic rise since the late 20th century.

"The increasing popularity of “y’all” can be attributed to a variety of factors, including the mainstream use of AAVE in media, as well as the fact that “y’all” is a preferable gender-neutral alternative to “you guys.” “Y’all” also rolls off the tongue in a softer, warmer way than “you guys” or even “you all.” For instance, “You guys come back tomorrow” sounds clunky and even vaguely threatening, while “Y’all come back tomorrow” may be perceived as both friendlier and more inviting.

"The correct spelling places an apostrophe between the “y” and the “a,” as it’s a contraction of “you” and “all.” The pronoun got a nod from Dictionary.com in the summer of 2021 when it gave “y’all” its own entry, separate from “you-all.” The entry notes the word “now communicates an informal tone more than a regional identity, and one that has become popular among younger demographics for its inclusivity.” . . .  Much more here...

Why We Don’t Like The Democratic Party

And why many call it "Democrat" instead of "Democratic" as a means of disrespect. Historically the major party in the South of the Civil War and their secession. TD

 Issues & Insights  

"The revolution that the Democratic Party has been pressing for at least six decades would abolish capitalism and free markets, seize the means of production, destroy the nuclear family, erase Christianity and Judaism, defund law enforcement, reopen the borders, censor speech, pack the Supreme Court, ration energy and health care, overturn our civil order and uproot Western civilization."


"In response to last week’s editorial “None Dare Call It A Republic,” one reader said I&I prefers “the term republic over democracy because” we “like the Republican Party” and “don’t like the Democratic Party.” Therefore we refuse to use the word “Democratic” because it “sounds just like the word ‘democratic.’” We can’t say we like the Republican Party, but we can say we despise the Democratic Party. Read on and we’ll tell you why.
"First, though, take a look at the reader’s full comment, found here. He calls us ignorant, which is fine – he’s entitled to his opinion. But his statement reminds us quite a bit of the gibberish yakked up by Joe Biden in last year’s presidential debate, which was so incoherent that in one instance Donald Trump said “I really don’t know what he said at the end of that sentence. I don’t think he knows what he said either.”
"But we understand enough of what our dedicated reader said to feel that it would be helpful to explain why we don’t like the Democratic Party, and not just so readers will understand but also to make it clear just how dissolute that party is.
"We could start with its lust for big government and all that comes with it: steep taxes, cruel regulation, appalling violations of property rights and an imperious and ever-hungry administrative state.
"Or we could frame our argument in terms of civil society vs. political society, with the Democrats hard in favor of the latter, which is a serial violator of liberty.
"Instead we’ll focus on what the Democrats want over all: a revolution." . . . More...

"This is why the “big tent” Democratic Party attracts disparate groups, such as environmental activists, eager central planners, redistributionists, anti-gun scolds, antifa goons, COVID tyrants, neo-New Dealers, radical Islamists, militant transgender moms, pride cultists, race hustlers, criminal coddlers, infanticide advocates, male-hating feminists, DEI zealots, busybodies, nannies, groomers, dancing geriatrics and raging protesters who have no idea what they’re protesting."

Jasmine Crockett Has a DEVASTATING New Attack Against Trump (You'll Never Guess What It Is)

Jasmine Crockett Has a DEVASTATING New Attack Against Trump (You'll Never Guess What It Is) – Twitchy   "Jazzy must be taking lessons from Joy Reid. All racist, all the time, without a single positive thought in that racist mind."

"Democrats like Crockett have played it about 25 million too many times. It's not just old, it's Jurassic."


The author with Michelle Obama

 "Last winter, I checked in with a friend in Democratic politics. "Life is weird sometimes," she wrote back, and told me she was staying at Alexander Soros' Hamptons house. I made a joke about coming to visit her—growing up in a midwestern working-class family, I'd always enjoyed getting a glimpse into the lives of the rich and powerful. "Sorry, it's for people of color leaders only," she wrote back. "It would be odd if you were there."
"As a former Democratic fundraiser, you'd think I would be numb to this kind of discrimination, but the truth continues to pain me: The Democratic Party, once the champions of civil rights in response to real injustices, is now the primary driver of racial division in America today. Lee Atwater's Southern strategy pales in comparison to the modern DNC's approach. No organization is more systematically racist." . . .
. . . "The Democrats' long-term strategy is to stoke racial resentment to build their coalition and energize non-white voters. The rhetoric is designed to convince minorities that America is irredeemably, structurally racist, and only Democrats will look out for them." . . . 
. . . If Harris loses, prepare for a full-blown meltdown of epic proportions. They will seethe at the racist deplorables who again elected Trump, and they will refuse to acknowledge racial changes in support because it contradicts their ideology. They will blame misogyny for the Black and Latino men who switched sides. You will hear terms like "white adjacent" and "internalized oppression" trotted out to explain why people of color voted for Trump.
"Democrats have done so much damage. They infantilize Black and brown people, treating them as victims with no agency. Instructing whites to never correct a minority is textbook racism, implying they can't handle criticism.
"Unfortunately, individuals steeped in DEI will not change their minds lightly, and those who use it for social power will never change. The only way Democrats will learn is by losing elections repeatedly while hemorrhaging minority votes. Racial dealignment between parties could turn the page and open a more hopeful chapter in American politics."

That ballroom; the episode continues!


Former Biden Aide: Demolition of East Wing 'Probably Needed'  . . . " 'It's heartbreaking, and I'm sentimental about it and sad," LaRosa said. "At the same time, I think every first family, every president, should play a role in evolving the White House and updating it and modernizing it and sometimes expanding it."

"I don't think there's any question that a ballroom is probably needed," LaRosa continued. "But I understand the sadness around the East Wing because I feel it myself.' " . . .

The arrangement no doubt frosts the perennial Trump opposition, but when you think of how many other projects have burned time and billions, there may be something to be said for the Trump route.

Joy Reid goes on unhinged rant about Trump’s WH ballroom. She clearly didn’t do her homework.   "Fired MSNBC host Joy Reid went on an unhinged rant about President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom while getting basic facts wrong.

"Reid falsely asserted that the taxpayers are paying for the construction of the new White House ballroom, though Trump and donors are paying for it with their own private funds. She lamented that Americans will not receive their food stamps while the ballroom construction is entering its early stages." . . .

 . . . "High-profile Democrats have accused Trump of abusing his power by tearing down the East Wing. Among those include California Gov. Gavin Newsom, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren. Many prominent political figures have falsely accused Trump of using Americans’ taxpayer dollars to fund the ballroom." . . .

MSNBC owners support Ballroom: Comcast is one of the donors paying for White House ballroom   

. . . "Despite the contributions, the Trump administration has attacked Comcast-owned media outlets such as NBC and MSNBC for content he’s found objectionable.

"The 90,000-square-foot ballroom, to be named after Trump, could hold close to 1,000 people for state dinners and events, Time magazine reported.

The project is not without controversy." . . .

Is Comcast helping fund Trump's $250M ballroom? MSNBC's parent company among the list of donors to fund White House's controversial renovation

So, can we stop the whining? MSNBC clowns, you literally funded what you call the desecration of the People’s House, which was also a silly term.

Deputy AG Todd Blanche Warns California Dems to ‘Stand Down or Face Prosecution’ After Pelosi Threatens to Arrest ICE Agents

 Debra Heine


"Department of Justice Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Thursday warned top California Democrats to “stand down or face prosecution” after Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) threatened to have federal law enforcement agents operating in her district arrested.
" 'Pelosi stated in a press release Wednesday that San Francisco police may arrest federal agents if they are found violating state law during U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids. Blanche stated on Friday that any officer who lays a hand on federal law enforcement will be committing a crime.
" 'The former speaker issued the press release in reaction to “reports of a planned mass immigration raid” in the San Francisco area, and denounced the raids as an “appalling abuse of law enforcement power.”
"President Trump has since put on hold his decision to send 100 additional ICE and federal agents to San Francisco, giving the local government one more chance to tackle the city’s high crime problem.
“ 'It is important to note that California law protects communities and prevents federal agents from taking certain actions here that we have witnessed in other states,” Pelosi stated on her press release.
" ' 'While the President may enjoy absolute immunity courtesy of his rogue Supreme Court, those who operate under his orders do not. Our state and local authorities may arrest federal agents if they break California law—and if they are convicted, the President cannot pardon them,” she added.
" 'The 85-year-old concluded that San Francisco residents will “continue to stand with the patriotic immigrants who are the constant reinvigoration of America.”
" 'San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins said in an interview that she had come up with the strategy after seeing federal agents allegedly “roughing up people in Los Angeles and Chicago,” according to the New York Times." . . .More...


Texas Dem Suggests She’ll Slash Republicans in the Throat If They Try to ‘Bully’ Her  . . . "She also said that her party’s lack of fight against the Trump administration is why Democrats are losing poor and black people. No, lady. That’s not it, because those voters already back the president. Yes, they’ve left Democrats—you got that part right—but they’re with us now.  

"They’re leaving your party because you don’t do anything except rage against Trump, and denigrate working people by accusing them of being dumb if you vote for anyone else." 

CNN host grills KJP over whether Biden ‘should be president right now’


Rebranding Failure: Broc Smith


CNN host grills KJP over whether Biden ‘should be president right now’ 
. . . “I mean, we’re talking 2023, 2024. Why didn’t you have concerns?” Keilar asked. “Why didn’t you raise them?”
" 'So I did not have any concerns. I saw him on a daily basis, Brianna,” Jean-Pierre said. “You know that. I saw him every day. I engaged with him every day.”
 "While Jean-Pierre acknowledged Biden “showed age,” she claimed he was “sharp.”
" 'This is a president that pushed his staff. This is a president that was on top of what the policies [were] that he cared about, that were important to the American people,” she said. “And let’s not forget, he also was leading a coalition, an international coalition when it came to something that we hadn’t seen in decades, when it came to the war in Ukraine. There was a lot going on.”
"As Jean-Pierre rambled on about what she claimed was Biden’s successful presidency and justified her defense of the former president’s mental acuity, Keilar cut her off to say she was not addressing her questions.
" 'Do you think he should be president right now? Do you think that he is capable right now of being president?” the CNN host asked. “Because that was what you were advocating for: someone who would be president in his current state until 2029.”“Yeah. I did not see anything that concerned me when he decided to run for president. I did not. This is someone that I saw every single day. Again, he was on top of the policies,” Jean-Pierre said. “He was sharp. He was someone that cared about what the outcome of the issues that were in front of the American people [were] and what we were doing. I’m speaking from my own personal opinion. "I’m speaking from what I saw on a day-to-day basis.” . . .More...

Joe Biden is Sharp as a Tack

Friday, October 24, 2025

Mehdi Hasan Has Tantrum As Americans Inform Him They Don’t Want Islamic Call To Prayer In Their Neighborhoods

 Daily Caller  

"Hasan also posted a sweeping historical claim. “One in three of the slaves who built this country were Muslims. They were here long before the Walsh family arrived." 


"Former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan lashed out online after Americans pushed back against his defense of the Islamic call to prayer being played in U.S. neighborhoods.

The Islamic call to prayer, or adhan, is broadcast five times daily and serves as a prominent auditory reminder of faith across Muslim communities. Hasan went on an extended rant on X, blasting what he called right-wing intolerance and claiming Muslim Americans face growing hostility from conservatives.

“I think that if you can play church bells you can pray the [Islamic] call to prayer. We are as American as anyone else and don’t take any BS,” Hasan can be heard saying in a video that was circulated on social media Tuesday. Republican Texas Rep. Brandon Gill quoted the video showing Hasan making those comments on the same day, sparking an exchange between the two.

"Hasan responded by pointing out that Gill’s wife is Indian American and the daughter of an immigrant. The congressman’s father-in-law is prominent Christian conservative documentary filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza.

"Gill in return responded to Hasan, pointing out that his wife is a Christian who “doesn’t Former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan lashed out online after Americans pushed back against his defense of the Islamic call to prayer being played in U.S. neighborhoods.

"The Islamic call to prayer, or adhan, is broadcast five times daily and serves as a prominent auditory reminder of faith across Muslim communities. Hasan went on an extended rant on X, blasting what he called right-wing intolerance and claiming Muslim Americans face growing hostility from conservatives.

“I think that if you can play church bells you can pray the [Islamic] call to prayer. We are as American as anyone else and don’t take any BS,” Hasan can be heard saying in a video that was circulated on social media Tuesday. Republican Texas Rep. Brandon Gill quoted the video showing Hasan making those comments on the same day, sparking an exchange between the two." . . .

Dems’ Hysterical Fits Over Trump’s White House Ballroom Remodel Shows There’s No Bottom To TDS

 Issues & Insights 

 "Of all the things that Democrats have tried to tar President Donald Trump with, none is as petty, stupid and inconsequential as the current flap over remodeling the East Wing of the White House"

. . . "Democrats’ ginned-up outrage (we could list literally dozens of caustic quotations and even threats from a congressional leader and a former Biden speechwriter about Trump’s project) shows their desperation, as their federal government shutdown didn’t turn out to be the political boon they thought.

"Meanwhile, Democrat do-nothings look awfully pathetic, screaming from the sidelines like children about a remodeling job as Trump addresses serious global problems the nation faces, one by one:

  • Illegal immigration slashed by closing the border and deporting criminals.
  • Ending or temporarily halting eight armed conflicts around the world during the first eight months in office, including those between Israel and Iran; Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo; Armenia and Azerbaijan; Thailand and Cambodia; India and Pakistan (nuclear powers); Egypt and Ethiopia; Serbia and Kosovo and, most recently, Israel and Hamas.
  • Addressing the threat of narco-terrorists by direct military action on the open seas, and by hardline diplomacy with cartel-backed socialist governments in Colombia and Venezuela.
  • Fending off continuing geopolitical challenges from Russia and China, as each tries to disrupt , occupy and bully neighboring nations.
  • Shrinking the budget deficit, something none thought would be possible but, with more revenue from tariffs and cost-cutting by government, is now a reality.
  • And keeping tax cuts in place through Republican passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which will save taxpayers literally trillions of dollars in the coming years, according to the Tax Foundation.

"How’s that for two-thirds of a year? None of this, of course, will stop desperate Dems from throwing rhetorical rocks at Trump’s new ballroom. But those who throw rocks, as our pre-woke mothers wisely warned us, shouldn’t live in glass houses." . . .  More...

Anger over the White House ballroom is purely performative 

 . . . "So, here’s a little background. The East Wing of the White House was nothing fancy. It was hastily built in 1942, when D.C. was inundated with people working on WWII-related matters. (If you’d like to see a charming 1943 romantic comedy about the housing shortage this flood of people caused, I highly recommend The More The Merrier.) In other words, the East Wing was not a historically significant architectural gem. It was a hastily created office space." . . .

Leaving California: Interviews With Californians Who Moved To Greener Pastures

 California Political Review   

" . . .CEOs continue to cite high taxes, regulatory burdens and rising costs of living as major obstacles.”

"What could possibly make someone leave Laguna Niguel and Coachella Valley, California for a move to Goodyear, Arizona? According to our latest interview with Barri on Leaving California, California’s highest-in-the-country cost-of-living, and “quality of life.”

"Everyone is piling on California these days, and for many valid reasons. California is always ranked as one of the worst states in the country in which to run a business, while many other states are ranked at the top of the chart. People leave because of the exorbitantly high cost of living, leftist politics, and ever encroaching government.

"California even ranks as one of the bottom five least free states – a dismal 48th – on CATO Institute’s Freedom in the 50 States ranking. New Hampshire, Florida, South Dakota, Nevada, and Arizona are the five freest states in the country.

"The Globe interviewed Barri, who left California 6 months ago and moved to Goodyear, Arizona, just outside of Phoenix. Barri is a native of Coachella Valley where her agriculture family were growers. She was living in Laguna Niguel when she decided to take the plunge and leave her home state.

"Interestingly, we’ve been doing this series since 2019, and will update some of the states’ offerings. Sadly, California still ranks at the bottom on so many of the important categories – income and corporate taxes, regulations, education, right-to-work, unemployment and freedom.

"Chief Executive’s annual CEO survey of the best and worst places to do business reflects the impact of transformed global trade environment, changing regulatory frameworks and massive demographic and technological shifts taking place across the nation and they always rank California in an embarrassing last place at 50th. Back in 2019 when we first started this series, Arizona, the Grand Canyon State, ranked number 7, with a booming business environment. It is now ranked at 10th, but notably in the top 10, and still 40 slots above California.

"This year, 2025, Chief Executive reports Texas and Florida once again top the list, with Texas retaining its long-held No. 1 position. “Both Texas and Florida are growing states, in people and infrastructure,” said one CEO respondent. “I think the policies there invite business and make it easy to do business.”tax and property taxes, although they are a little less than California.”

“ 'IllinoisNew York and California maintain their position as the bottom three states. Despite their economic scale and cultural capital, CEOs continue to cite high taxes, regulatory burdens and rising costs of living as major obstacles.” . . .What could possibly make someone leave Laguna Niguel and Coachella Valley, California for a move to Goodyear, Arizona? According to our latest interview with Barri on Leaving California, California’s highest-in-the-country cost-of-living, and “quality of life.”

Everyone is piling on California these days, and for many valid reasons. California is always ranked as one of the worst states in the country in which to run a business, while many other states are ranked at the top of the chart. People leave because of the exorbitantly high cost of living, leftist politics, and ever encroaching government.

California even ranks as one of the bottom five least free states – a dismal 48th – on CATO Institute’s Freedom in the 50 States ranking. New Hampshire, Florida, South Dakota, Nevada, and Arizona are the five freest states in the country.

The Globe interviewed Barri, who left California 6 months ago and moved to Goodyear, Arizona, just outside of Phoenix. Barri is a native of Coachella Valley where her agriculture family were growers. She was living in Laguna Niguel when she decided to take the plunge and leave her home state.

Interestingly, we’ve been doing this series since 2019, and will update some of the states’ offerings. Sadly, California still ranks at the bottom on so many of the important categories – income and corporate taxes, regulations, education, right-to-work, unemployment and freedom.

Chief Executive’s annual CEO survey of the best and worst places to do business reflects the impact of transformed global trade environment, changing regulatory frameworks and massive demographic and technological shifts taking place across the nation and they always rank California in an embarrassing last place at 50th. Back in 2019 when we first started this series, Arizona, the Grand Canyon State, ranked number 7, with a booming business environment. It is now ranked at 10th, but notably in the top 10, and still 40 slots above California.

This year, 2025, Chief Executive reports Texas and Florida once again top the list, with Texas retaining its long-held No. 1 position. “Both Texas and Florida are growing states, in people and infrastructure,” said one CEO respondent. “I think the policies there invite business and make it easy to do business.”tax and property taxes, although they are a little less than California.” . . . More...

There’s No Going Back If NYC Elects Zohran Mamdani

New York elected de Blasio, they are capable of wanting Mamdani. TF

 Victor Davis Hanson

"No, no, no. You can’t deal with Mamdani. You cannot deal with him. If he wins, he’s going to target all of you. And New York is not going to be New York as we knew it."

The Glorious Coming Lessons of the Mamdani Landslide


. . . "You would never get on a plane that was built ignoring the laws of physics and aerodynamics, yet people are going to vote for a person who espouses ideas that have never worked in the history of man. I can’t stop you from eating dirt if that’s what you really want to do, but don’t expect much sympathy from me when you cry that your stomach hurts."

 "John Conlin is an expert in organizational design and change. He also holds a BS in Earth Sciences and an MBA and is the founder and President of E.I.C. Enterprises. He has been published in American Greatness, The Federalist, The Daily CallerAmerican Thinker, Houston Chronicle, Denver Post, and Public Square Magazine among others."

Jeffries Warns That Donors Behind Trump White House Ballroom Will be Investigated

 Legal Insurrection

“And all of this is going to have to be investigated. It will. All of this will have to be uncovered. It will.”

"In case you haven’t noticed, Democrats are in full-on meltdown mode over Trump’s addition of a ballroom to the White House. Tweets on X accompanied by pictures of the construction decry the project as an assault on the White House and America itself. As usual, it’s completely over the top.

"The rhetoric from Democratic leaders is just as deranged. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries went on MSNBC this week and vowed to investigate the donors who are funding this project.

"Democrats constantly claim that Trump is targeting his enemies, then, in the same breath, vow to do the same."

From Townhall:

Jeffries said, without evidence, that the donors were probably using the donations to curry favor with the Trump administration.

“More likely, this is part of what Donald Trump has been doing since day one of his presidency: running the largest pay-to-play scheme in the history of the country. And probably soliciting donations from people who’ve got business before the United States government,” Jeffries said. . A CNN report from 2010:

$376 million White House renovation during the Obama Administration.
Where was the Democrat outrage then? pic.twitter.com/MvLVDFcTru

— Christian Collins (@CollinsforTX) October 22, 2025