Nonetheless, he is correct that we lack legitimate debate about crucial issues today. But his rationale is backward.
The Lid (lidblog.com) "This discourse occurred mere hours before Carlson, in his first utterance since being dismissed by Fox News, tweeted out a video arguing that he now realizes how “unbelievably stupid most of the debates you see on television are.”
"Carlson went on to claim that “the undeniably big topics, the ones that will define our future, get virtually no discussion at all. War, civil liberties, emerging science, demographic change, corporate power, natural resources—when did you hear a legitimate debate about any of those issues? It’s been a long time. Debates like that are not permitted in American media. Both political parties and their donors have reached a consensus on what benefits them, and they actively collude to shut down any conversation about it.”. . .
. . ."We don’t live in a “one-party state,” as Carlson and his acolytes claim. We live in tribal bubbles, and yes, media corporations like the ones Carlson took gobs of money from do cater to the tastes of bubble-dwelling viewers who seek performative politics over substance. Want a substantive debate? Read a Substack, turn on any of the stellar podcasts out there, or visit a think tank event. Don’t visit a college campus or watch primetime cable news.". . .
The Fox host's own actions set his dismissal from the network in motion.
— National Review (@NRO) April 27, 2023
Fox was following best business practices. | @NoahCRothman https://t.co/C2xrya5utQ
Elites Mock Tucker Carlson at Nerd Prom White House Correspondents' Dinner (breitbart.com)