Friday, September 6, 2024

Iran Planned Assassinations of Trump, Biden, Haley, and Others?

 Mary Chastain (legalinsurrection.com)  "I ask again: How many other people are hunting Americans on our soil?"


"Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) released FBI documents detailing the Iran-backed assassination plots against Donald Trump, Joe Biden, Nikki Haley, and others.

"Iran wanted revenge for the killing of IRGC Officer Qasem Soleimani in 2022.

"The DOJ indicted Pakistani national Asif Merchant for trying to perform the assassinations.

“Bad actors are determined to wreak havoc on our country, and American political leaders across both parties are sitting squarely in the crosshairs,” stated Grassley. “In this extraordinarily heightened threat environment, federal agencies ought to be laser focused on building up public trust and reassuring the American people of their efforts to carry out their protective missions. I won’t stop pressing for answers until Congress and the American people are afforded the transparency they deserve.” . . .

DOJ Charges Pakistani Man With Ties to Iran in Foiled Plot to Assassinate Trump, Govt. Officials

True or false? How can we believe government agencies run by Democrats anymore? TD

Idonttweet in reply to MarkS. | September 6, 2024 at 1:20 pm   

I’m not going to entirely dismiss the reporting as false, but I don’t trust the FBI. I want to see the raw intelligence data, and whatever they used to corroborate it. And I want to know who their Confidential Source is, what was his degree of access to the reported information and why they believed his reporting was reliable. (Remember that they maintained that Christopher Steele’s reporting was assessed as reliable.)

Is there any reason to believe this is not just another case of the FBI claiming information was reliable only so they could swoop in and foil some diabolical scheme at the last moment so that they could look like heroes to Congress and the public?

Again, I’m not saying it couldn’t be true, but the FBI has lied too many times in the past to get the benefit of the doubt.

No comments: