New York Attorney Gen.-elect Letitia James is buttressing President Trump’s claims that there is a “witch hunt” pursuing him; she told NBC News that she intends to investigate not only the president, but also his family and "anyone" in his circle who may have violated the law. . . .
"I think within the first 100 days this bill will be passed," she said, adding, "It is a priority because I have concerns with respect to the possibility that this administration might pardon some individuals who might face some criminal charges, but I do not want them to be immune from state charges."
"With Rep. Ted Lieu admitting his frustration with the First Amendment, yesterday saw two prominent Dems revealing the inner tyrants.
It seems to me a safe bet that once the Democrats take control of the House of Representatives, they will spiral even faster into a frenzy to "get" Trump and will present a spectacle to the American public that will be a sobering lesson. But in the month ahead, I would not rule out more auto-unmasking of tyrant-wannabes."
Dem Rep. Ted Lieu says that he'd 'love to be able to regulate the content of speech'
Now, the second clause of his second sentence is curious. That Congressman Lieu thinks that in the long run, free speech is a good idea suggest that right now, he doesn't think it's a good thing. Does this mean that during the Trump presidency, free speech would be suspended if he had his druthers? Would the "long run" be when Democrats have imported enough impoverished foreigners to guarantee perpetual rule? Or maybe just when Trump is out of office?
Last March, I noted that TDS is driving what I called "the great unmasking of the left."