Who is behind the No Kings protests?

"It is long past time for real answers.  Who owns the No Kings domain?  Who receives the emails?  Who paid for the infrastructure?  Who designed the logo and coordinated the livestream?  These are not unsolvable mysteries." . . . 

Todd Baumann  "If China is involved in the recent No Kings protests across the U.S., it’s potentially an act of war.

"The circumstantial evidence is on full display.  Rep. Erick Swalwell (D-Calif.) was on hand at a No Kings protest this weekend.  It was Swalwell who was compromised by a female Chinese spy and served on the House Intelligence Committee.  Yet he feels emboldened to stand with No Kings without consequence.

"That is a problem all by itself.

"We’re constantly told these riots are highly organized and coordinated.  What we’re not told is who is responsible.  Who’s funding the travel, the signage, the livestreams, the paid organizers?  We’re told there are progressive groups behind it.  If there are CCP financiers behind it, we should know.  Our law enforcement officials should tell us.

"The media avoid questions like the plague.  The Biden-holdover bureaucrats in the Intelligence Community won’t say.  And the current FBI director, Kash Patel, seems to be staring into space while Attorney General Pam Bondi offers no public clarity.  If this is what decisive national security leadership looks like, the American people are right to be concerned.

"To be fair, Patel did say he’s looking into foreign influence here.  Historically, an announcement like this is meant to assure the American people that something is being done.  In reality, it rarely goes beyond that.  The assurance dies on the vine and is replaced by other shiny toys from future news cycles.

"Meanwhile, George Soros’s son — long rumored to help bankroll these sorts of operations — just married Huma Abedin, daughter of Saleha Abedin, a Muslim Sisterhood leader.  The “wedding” took place on the same day as the original No Kings day of protest.  There are mountains of evidence that Huma’s connections to the group should have prevented her from ever obtaining a security clearance when she served secretary of State Hillary Clinton.  All those who looked the other way, to include elected Republicans, are dirty." . . .