"Communists and other tyrannies hate middle class people—the bourgeois—because they are not dependent upon government. What made the American Revolution unique was the wealthy led it as a fight for independence."
"Bodegas are what they call little corner stores in New York City. They are mostly owned by foreign-born immigrants who use it as a means to achieve middle-class status.
"Puerto Ricans gave them the name in the 1940s. They gave way to Dominicans after the original owners moved on up (moved on up). Then Mexico and other Latin American groups came along, as well as many Yemenis. The bodegas are the boots that immigrants use to bootstrap.
"Chinese, Koreans and Egyptians moved in and are moving on up (moving on up).
Before bodegas, Italians, Greeks, Jews, Irish and Germans owned many small groceries in earlier waves of immigration but largely moved on or sold to later arrivals.
Mamdani promised a string of city-owned grocery stores to compete with bodegas, which would put them out of business because bodegas have to pay taxes and rent, something a city-owned bodega would not have to do.
Despite this, the United Bodegas of America endorsed him." . . .
You get what you vote for, in this case bodega owners voted for a competitor that bodegas will finance through taxes that they pay.
 |
Mamdani's Rent Freeze BACKFIRES As NYC Landlords Start Dumping Buildings "In June 2026, New York City's Rent Guidelines Board voted to freeze rents on roughly one million rent-stabilized apartments across the five boroughs — a zero-percent increase that delivered on Mayor Zohran Mamdani's signature campaign promise and drew celebration from the tenants who had rallied for it. In this breakdown, we examine what that vote actually set in motion beneath the applause: a board reshaped by mayoral appointments, a landlord representative who resigned rather than sign her name to the outcome, and a dissenting economist who warned the city had walked this exact path before, in the New York of the 1970s. We trace how a policy sold as relief ran headlong into the arithmetic of keeping aging buildings standing — rents frozen, while insurance, fuel, taxes, and maintenance were not.
"The deeper question we explore is who absorbs the cost of a freeze that caps income on one side of the ledger while leaving every rising expense untouched on the other. Large corporate owners with market-rate units can cushion the blow; small, generational landlords and the buildings that are almost entirely rent-stabilized — concentrated in the Bronx, Upper Manhattan, and central Brooklyn — cannot. We look at what happens when those owners decide there is no longer a reason to hold on: distressed buildings changing hands at steep losses, some sold for less than the debt owed against them, and small owners replaced not by neighbors but by speculators and funds. Notably, the sharpest warning comes not from the real estate lobby but from a mission-driven affordable-housing lender, whose own projections suggest a policy built to protect tenants could deepen the very distress it promised to end." . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment