Saturday, January 26, 2013

Dempsey considers lowering standards for women in combat

We knew this was coming.  Don't say we weren't warned What do you expect from a party that believes that equality of outcomes trumps intelligent decisions?
This Ain't Hell but you can see it from here
"Our least favorite Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Martin Dempsey, in his press conference on Thursday along with our least favorite Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, hinted that he just might consider lowering the standards to let women in the jobs which might take them into combat, according to the Washington Times;
When a reporter mentioned that the Pentagon’s stance appeared to keep open the possibility that some occupational specialties would be off limits to females, Gen. Dempsey responded: “[I]f we do decide that a particular standard is so high that a woman couldn’t make it, the burden is now on the service to come back and explain to the secretary, why is it that high? Does it really have to be that high?”
Do you think these next articles are going off on a tangent, or do you see the correlation?

Totally different, but related area showing there are no limits to the silliness of this nation's equality laws
"So, a boy in a wheelchair comes up to the high school football coach and says, “I want to be a linebacker.”
"And the coach says …”Of course. Under federal funding guidelines from the Department of Education, we have to let you play.” "

The Left’s Obsession with Equality of Outcomes, Taken to a Logical Extreme
" I’m almost at a loss for words. What sort of sickness is required to deny something to one group of kids just because the same benefit is not universally available?"

No comments: