Saturday, March 23, 2019

Those Pushing Collusion Hoax Must Face Consequences


Will we learn anything from the Russia collusion hoax? Or will the same cast of liars and buffoons simply move on to the next scam? “Climate Change! The Green New Deal! We can’t give you details. It’s too important. Obey or else!” That could easily happen. In fact it will happen, for certain, unless we remember exactly what we’ve just seen. Tucker Carlson


Politic Talks  "Tucker Carlson called for consequences for those who pushed the Trump-Russian collusion narrative if the report by special counsel Robert Mueller shows none in a monologue delivered on the Thursday broadcast of his FOX News show.

"For now, we’d like to take a second to put this entire, sprawling story in perspective. Our job on this show is to remember things, to create a record of what’s happened in this country over the past few years, and what’s happened to it. Our grandchildren will want to know. If the left has its way, they will never see the details. It will all be whitewashed, like so much else in our history. So let’s recall, for the record, what the Robert Mueller investigation is about, why we got a special counsel in the first place. The point wasn’t to discover whether the president fudged deductions on his tax returns thirty years ago. It wasn’t to find out whether he wanted to build another hotel in foreign country. From its first day, the Mueller investigation was justified by a single question: Did Donald Trump collude with the Russian government to steal the 2016 presidential election? Did the president betray his country? 

For close to three years, Democrats have told us that, yes, he did:
BETO: It’s beyond a shadow of a doubt that if there was not collusion, there was at least the effort to collude
ADAM SCHIFF: I think there’s plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight
MAXINE WATERS: There’s more to be learned about it. I believe there has been collusion.
JOHN PODESTA: It’s starting to smell more and more like collusion
NANCY PELOSI: We saw cold, hard evidence of the Trump campaign, the Trump family eagerly intending to collude possibly with Russia.

"If you grew up in this country, it’s hard to shrug off charges like the ones you just heard. Maxine Waters is an irrelevant person, a living sideshow. But Nancy Pelosi is hardly that. She is the speaker of the House of Representatives. She’s third in line to the presidency. Adam Schiff is the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. He’s privy to the most highly-classified information our government possesses. John Podesta was the Chief of Staff in one White House and a senior advisor in another. Beto O’Rourke has raised more money than anyone else running for president in 2020. These are not peripheral figures. They are the most serious people in the modern Democratic Party. We took them seriously. We felt we had a duty to understand why they were calling the president of the United States a traitor. So we asked them. We interviewed a number of them on this show. One of the most persistent accusers was congressman Eric Swalwell of California, who is also a member of the House intelligence committee. If there was indeed evidence of collusion with Russia, Swalwell would have it. Yet he never produced any. We asked him repeatedly. Swalwell accused us of cutting him off, of not letting him make his case on the air. Finally, in frustration, we offered him a full half an hour, live on this show to do that:" . . .

Stilton's Place
Should Trump-Russia Collusion Accusers Face Consequences if Mueller Probe Reveals None? . . .  "The first person that should be held liable for lying about Trump is former British spy Christopher Steele.
"Steels(sp) has just admitted that he heavily relied upon unverified information that members of the public freely posted on a CNN hosted webpage. 
"Then Fusion GPS, the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee should be held liable for the lies of collusion. 
"Next should be those in the FBI who used Steele’s lies to obtain the FISA warrant to spy on a member of the Trump campaign in Trump Tower.
"Then something should be done to hold accountable all of the Democrats and Republicans who repeated the collusion lies along with the media who still continues to push the lie. "

The inflection point: Mueller Report delivery will unleash the counter-narrative
. . . "Conservative Trump-supporters have been chafing for about two years, angry that investigation of the real scandal hasn't been forthcoming.  Slowly, slowly, they are going to get their satisfaction, well timed for maximum impact November 2020."

GrrrGraphics

Democrats in Denial After Mueller Report Completed, Vow to Keep Investigating and “Find the Truth”  . . . "Rep. Schiff, who has made a name for himself peddling speculation about the investigation is on the case!" . . .


David Reaboi tweeted:
It was always a HOAX. 
It was spread w millions of dollars through a massive network of hack journalists who became conspiracy theorists & partisan operatives. 
    It was indulged by lunatics who didn’t care about what would happen if they accused a      president of being a traitor.

Meanwhile, could the recent turnabout in the North Korean attitude be caused by the Democrat attacks on our President?

No comments: