If Democrats and their left supporters rule this country and control our information, we must learn to read between the lines of 1984-ish language.
. . . "In other words, some act of senseless plane violence, perhaps by the planes' pilots who aimed so carefully? Or perhaps accidentally? Who knows? As Rep Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) so memorably expressed it, "some people did something." Some people...could have been anyone, perhaps some privileged American white folks who flash Benjamins. And anyway, what they did was just...something. No big deal.
"WRONG! Apparently, there are millions of people still alive who not only remember the horror of 9/11, but know that someone has to "aim" the planes, and those who aimed the planes were not the pilots. They were...Muslims. Al-Qaeda Muslims. Al-Qaeda Muslim terrorists, financed by Muslim nations, perhaps Saudi Arabia, perhaps others, according to the 9/11 Commission Report, who hated America and all it stood for. And so, after many protests and just plain angry mockery, the N.Y. Times felt compelled to delete the original tweet that apparently didn't fill the need for truth in all the news millions require and replaced it with with a slightly more accurate version. " . . .Raheem Kassam: The Media Has A Problem Covering 9/11
The New York Times began its 9/11 coverage this year with an avian appeal. The 9/11 tribute lights, they claim, are putting 160,000 birds at risk every year.. . . "Imagine a right-wing website marking the far less deadly Charlottesville attack with a tweet that read, “A car took aim at Heather Heyer.”
No, a car didn’t take aim. A frenzied neo-Nazi did.
"No planes “took aim” on 9/11. Frenzied Islamic terrorists did.
"The Times was forced to back down, issuing a tweet that reads: “We’ve deleted an earlier tweet to this story and have edited for clarity. The story has also been updated.” The changes made to the story are unlisted, and the New York Times has not responded to my request for clarity at the time of publication.
"The paper also saw fit to publish an opinion-editorial by Omer Aziz, about how hard 9/11 made it to be a Muslim." . . .
. . . "On Aug. 5, 2019, he published what CNN laundered as a think-tank article by New America, titled: “Right-Wingers Are America’s Deadliest Terrorists.”
. . .
"The Times was forced to back down, issuing a tweet that reads: “We’ve deleted an earlier tweet to this story and have edited for clarity. The story has also been updated.” The changes made to the story are unlisted, and the New York Times has not responded to my request for clarity at the time of publication.
"The paper also saw fit to publish an opinion-editorial by Omer Aziz, about how hard 9/11 made it to be a Muslim." . . .
. . . "On Aug. 5, 2019, he published what CNN laundered as a think-tank article by New America, titled: “Right-Wingers Are America’s Deadliest Terrorists.”
. . .
"This is not to say that domestic terrorism related to Neo Nazism or ethno-nationalism is non-existent. But using 9/11 — as CNN has — to foster fears of a clearly less significant threat on a symbolic day is indicative of a deep-seated problem America’s media has with the day that shook the world."
"Avlon closed his two minutes of fear-mongering about “right-wing” terror by demanding, “To truly learn the lessons of 9/11 is to resolve not to let hate win or fear define us.”
"Between birds and” whataboutery,” America’s establishment journalists reveal who really has amnesia: them.
No comments:
Post a Comment