Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Forget About Affordability, Dems Plan An Impeachment Bonanza Next Year

Democrats to the murderers in Iran and Hamas: stay strong and resist America under Trump; we're coming to the rescue! TD

Issues & Insights 

"But the pent-up desire among the radicals who control the Democratic Party to exact revenge on Trump and destroy his administration is so all-consuming that affordability will be the last thing on their minds."

"After spending months harping on the nation’s affordability “crisis,” Democrats have recently let slip that their real goal, if they get a majority in Congress, will be to impeach as many Trump administration officials as time allows over the next two years.

"They will market it as “holding the administration accountable,” but the goal is far more sinister – to purposefully cripple the administration, regardless of the danger it poses to the nation.

"In the past few days, articles in the Atlantic and MS NOW – two eminently reliable mouthpieces of the Democratic Party – said the party is considering a raft of impeachments of Trump Cabinet officials, if not Donald Trump himself.

"The latter, they point out, is politically difficult. No matter how much Trump haters would love to see him impeached for a third time, it almost certainly won’t lead to his conviction and removal, and could serve only to reenergize Republicans just before a presidential election. (Rep. Al Green, for one, doesn’t care, and has already introduced another impeachment resolution.)

"But why not go after Cabinet officials? Among those already on the list are War Secretary Pete Hegseth (Republican Rep. Thomas Massie decided to help Democrats on his way out by filing articles of impeachment against Hegseth), Education Secretary Linda McMahon, and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The left has also been calling to impeach Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent for more than a year.

"In other words, Democrats are going to target any Cabinet official who has been effectively defying the left’s policy agenda. And they intend to weaponize impeachment to settle policy differences.

"The thinking is that, at the very least, these impeachments will effectively stop work at those agencies. Or they will lead to the departures of these officials. (Democrats point to the fact that the mere threat of impeachment – which would have gone nowhere in the Republican-controlled House – pushed Kristi Noem and Pam Bondi out of their roles.)

"But if Democrats gain control of the House, which looks likely, they can – and likely will – proceed full bore to start a raft of impeachment proceedings." . . .  More.

Justly sickened by the mass slaughter of a generation, the college generation of England swore not to go to war again for anyone. History records that evil nations took heart at the British position and were emboldened to act as they did. Churchill wrote later that many of these same rebels, when seeing the evil of Naziism became gallant soldiers against Hitler. 

One must only hope today's keffiyeh-clad useful idiots will lose their ignorance before any more babies in Israeli cribs will be burned alive. The Tunnel Dweller.

The Gathering Storm
King and Country debate  "The King and Country debate refers to a contentious session of the Oxford Union Society on 9 February 1933, during which the motion "That this House will in no circumstances fight for its King and Country" was proposed, debated, and carried by a majority vote of 275 to 153.[1][2] This event, occurring mere days after Adolf Hitler's appointment as German Chancellor on 30 January 1933, encapsulated the pervasive pacifist sentiments among many British students scarred by the First World War's devastation, yet it ignited fierce backlash for appearing to repudiate national loyalty amid rising European threats.[3][2]

. . . "In Nazi Germany, the outcome of the 1933 Oxford Union debate was exploited in propaganda to depict Britain as decadent and unwilling to defend itself, thereby bolstering perceptions of German superiority and encouraging aggressive policies. A prominent Nazi youth leader referenced the vote in a conversation with British MP Robert Bernays later that year, expressing satisfaction at what he interpreted as evidence of British pacifism and moral decline.[2][22] This usage aligned with broader Nazi efforts to undermine Allied resolve, though direct influence on Adolf Hitler's strategic decisions remains a matter of historical interpretation rather than documented causation.[3]" . . .


No comments: