Starnes: Conservatives Blast CBS News for 'Anti-Christian Bigotry'

Todd Starnes, Fox Nation

. . . "Anti-Christian bigotry at its worst, broadcast on CBS Television - and made worse because a supporter of the Southern Poverty Law Center shot and wounded a security guard during a domestic terrorist attack on the Family Research Council's headquarters in 2013.

"Mr. Bozell said there's a lesson to be learned here: Christians need to be prepared.

“ 'Be prepared to be ambushed,” he said. “Be prepared to be slandered. Be prepared to be verbally persecuted.”

"It would be easy to dismiss Mr. Schieffer's ignorance as nothing more than sloppy journalism. But we're not talking about a local cable access show. We're talking about "Face the Nation. "

"Tony Perkins is my friend. He is a good and decent and honorable man - and he deserves better. The only way for Bob Schieffer and CBS News to save face is to face the nation - and apologize." . . .

H/T to  BuycottIndiana  That's BUYcott, you know.

SNL Takes On the Fear of Drawing Muhammad

Mediaite  ..."Tonight’s SNL put on a fake Pictionary-like game show called Picture Perfect, but with a timely twist: One character, Family Matters‘ Reginald VelJohnson (played by Kenan Thompson) was asked to draw Muhammed and, well, considering recent events, balked at the opportunity.

"Ultimately, Reese Witherspoon‘s character guessed, the clue correctly because, well, there was nothing on the easel and the contestant was absolutely afraid to draw it. So there are only a few things it could be, considering recent news?

"Watch below, via NBC:" . . .

Whose lives matter?

The Liberal Media - Killing America

"Stay Quiet and You'll Be Okay"

Toon by Bosch Fawstin

  Via PJ Media, which introduced this Steyn article with this:

 STAY QUIET AND YOU’LL BE OKAY:  Mark Steyn defends free speech by calling out the “I love free speech as much as anyone, but” crowd, which includes all progressives, and some prominent self-proclaimed conservatives like Bill O’Reilly.  Steyn observes:

Mark Steyn

. . . " It'll be a long time before you see "Washington Post Offers No Apology for Attacking Target of Thwarted Attack" or "AP Says It Has No Regrets After Blaming The Victim". The respectable class in the American media share the same goal as the Islamic fanatics: They want to silence Pam Geller. To be sure, they have a mild disagreement about the means to that end - although even then you get the feeling, as with Garry Trudeau and those dozens of PEN novelists' reaction to Charlie Hebdo, that the "narrative" wouldn't change very much if the jihad boys had got luckier and Pam, Geert Wilders, Robert Spencer and a dozen others were all piled up in the Garland morgue." . . .
. . .
"Free speech is necessary to free society for all the stuff after the "but", after the "however". There's no fine line between "free speech" and "hate speech": Free speech is hate speech; it's for the speech you hate - and for all your speech that the other guy hates. If you don't have free speech, then you can't have an honest discussion. All you can do is what those stunted moronic boobs in Paris and Copenhagen and Garland did: grab a gun and open fire. What Miliband and Cotler propose will, if enacted, reduce us all to the level of the inarticulate halfwits who think the only dispositive argument is "Allahu Akbar".
"Alas, we have raised a generation of But boys." . . .
. . .
". . . when violent Muslims stage their first explicit anti-free-speech attack on American soil, everyone thinks the mouthy free-speech broad is the problem. This soft jihad goes on every day of the week, and Bill O'Reilly doesn't even seem to be aware that it exists.

Steyn's bottom line, to which I add emphasis:

But Islam is telling you that subject's closed off. Not long after 9/11, some theatre group in Cincinnati announced a play contrasting a Palestinian suicide bomber and the American Jewish girl she killed. Local Muslims complained, and so the production was immediately canceled - because all the arty types who say we need "artists" with the "courage" to "explore" "transgressive" "ideas" fold like a cheap Bedouin tent when it comes to Islam. The Muslim community complained not because the play was anti-Muslim: au contraire, it was almost laughably pro-Palestinian, and the playwright considered the suicide bomber a far more sensitive sympathetic character than her dead Jewish victim.
But that wasn't the point: the Muslim leaders didn't care whether the play was pro- or anti-Islam: for them, Islam is beyond discussion. End of subject. And so it was.

 ISIS threatens controversial blogger Pamela Geller in message boasting of '71 trained soldiers in 15 different states' . . . "Our aim was the khanzeer (pig) Pamela Geller and to show her that we don't care what land she hides in or what sky shields her; we will send all our Lions to achieve her slaughter."

"It says the militants will target Geller and anyone who hides or hosts her.Another high-profile target of terrorists, controversial Dutch lawmaker Geert Wilders, made a brief appearance at the contest, where he spoke to the 200 attendees before leaving with his security team." . . .

 Who is Pamela Geller?

Would these same critics have told MLK to be quiet and he'd be OK?
I suppose their logic would say that all this was the fault of Dr. Martin Luther King:

 

Another Poll: Hillary Least Trusted

iOTWReport   "NEW YORK (WNB) – A new Farnum Poll shows presidential candidate Hillary Clinton struggling to earn the American public’s trust.

 

The above is satire, in case that was not obvious to you; but below is not:

Business Insider agrees she has a trust issue  Put another way, the woman is not to be trusted and should be kept as far away from the White House as possible. Forever. 
 . . . "Even so, she is viewed more favorably than her potential Republican rivals, none of whom are as well-known as the former secretary of state, senator and first lady."

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/poll-voters-dont-trust-hillary-clinton-2015-5#ixzz3ZkgeWdo4

George Clooney pledges to support Hillary Clinton any way he can

How Can So Many World Leaders Be So Wrong?

 Whether from ignorance or a dark hidden agenda, the whole of the global warming/climate change is aimed at harming billions, many of whom need the power that this hoax would deny to everyone.

Warning Signs

 

"In a recent Daily Caller article, Michael Bastach took note of “25 Years of predicting The Global Warming ‘Tipping Point’.” This is the message that the Earth is warming rapidly and, if we don’t abandon the use of fossil fuels for power, it will arrive to wreak destruction on the human race and all life on the planet.

"It is astounding how many past and present world leaders are telling everyone this despite the total lack of any real science, nor any actual warming—the Earth has been in a natural cooling cycle since 1997!

. . . " Climate Change (IPCC) that has been issuing apocalyptic predictions since its inception in 1988. None of its predictions have come true. How could they, based as they are on the false science of computer models, not that based on observable climate events and trends?

"To this day our own government through its meteorological agencies has been caught manipulating the data gathered over the years to conform with the “warming” scenario. The worst has been the Environmental Protection Agency which is engaged in an effort to shut down coal-fired utilities and access to every other energy source on which we depend to power the nation." . . .Read more...

Was Hillary Clinton abusive to her staff and security people?

Snopes calls it "undetermined" They list "WHAT WAS, WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN, AND WHAT IS"

. . . " Former Pres. Bush Sr. and the current president Bush make it a point to thank and take care of the aircrews who fly them around [When the president flies, there are several planes that also go — one carries the armored limo, another the security detail, plus usually a press aircraft] and both Bush's made it a point to stay home on holidays, so these Air Force and security people could have a day with their families. 
  
WHAT WAS:

Hillary Clinton was arrogant and vocally abusive to her security detail. She forbade her daughter, Chelsea, from exchanging pleasantries with them. Sometimes Chelsea, miffed at her mother's obvious conceit and mean spiritedness ignored her demands and exchanged pleasantries regardless, but never in her mother's presence. Chelsea really was a nice, kindhearted, and lovely young lady. The consensus opinion was that Chelsea loved her Mom but did not like her.

Hillary Clinton was continuously rude and abrasive to those who were charged to protect her life. Her security detail dutifully did their job, as professionals should, but they all "loathed" her and wanted to be on a different detail. She was hard to work for because she was so nasty and mean toward her detail. Hillary Clinton was uniformly despised by the Secret Service as a whole. 

. . .  "Neither [Hillary nor Gore] trusted Bill Clinton and, the Secret Service opined, neither of them even liked Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton did have some good qualities where Al Gore and Hillary had none in the view of their security details.

" Origins:   Proving (or disproving) the genuineness of an anonymous second-hand report of information supposedly provided by an equally anonymous Secret Service agent is a formidable task, but several factors tend to indicate this piece is more likely something created for partisan political reasons than an actual Secret Service agent's account:
 . . .
"As Time magazine noted as far back as 1993, cranking out spurious stories that discredited Hillary Clinton and were attributed to Secret Service agents was a known political trick:" . . .


" ‘Stay the f**k away from me! Just f*****g do as I say!!!’ she is quoted as saying to an agent who refused to carry her luggage in the book Unlimited Access by FBI agent Gary Aldridge. " Compared to Hillary’s salty language, Bill Clinton was a gentleman, according to now-retired Secret Service agent, Dan Emmett, who began covering President Clinton on his first day in office in 1993 and writes about guarding the President in a new version of his book" . . .

Secret Service agent: Clinton’s staff rude, Hillary aloof
"In several anecdotes, former agent Dan Emmett revealed that Clinton’s young staff had “fundamental traits of rudeness and arrogance” that teetered on the verge of being dangerous at times. “Most of these youngsters were from wealthy families, and many viewed Secret Services agents as the hired help,” he writes in “Within Arms’s(sp) Length,” an autobiography that provides new details of the inner Secret Service.
. . . 
 "Still, the service is not happy with the anecdotes in the book. “We do stress to all our employees the importance of not sharing anecdotes about the personal, private moments of the protectees,” said Secret Service spokesman Ed Donovan. “It causes concern because we don’t want to erode the trust that we have with our protectees.' ”

Angry Hillary threw book at Secret Service agent  . . . "Another retired Secret Service veteran, a plainclothes agent assigned to Clinton’s security detail,corroborated the book-throwing account. “Yeah, it’s true,” he said, without elaborating." . . .
. . . "A Washington Metro Police detective also recalled hearing of the incident at the time, adding that the former first lady “was pretty sh–ty to the Secret Service guys.”

All the above is consistent with her order to fire the White House Travel Office people with the command "fire their asses" of which The Sun Sentinel says she was not proven guilty
. . . " Hillary is a serial perjurer who says she did not give orders to fire the White House Travel Office in 1993, even though David Watkins later said Hillary said to “fire their asses” and he wrote a memo saying there would be “hell to pay” if they Travel Office was not fired immediately." . . .

 "With respect to Mrs. Clinton, there was substantial evidence that she had a `role' in the decision to fire the travel office employees," Ray said in his statement. "Nevertheless, the evidence was insufficient to prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that any of Mrs. Clinton's statements and testimony regarding her involvement in the Travel Office firings were knowingly false."

And this: Hillary and Bill: A Lifetime of Violating People

 

German soldiers react to footage of concentration camps, 1945

Rare Historical Photos (and the stories behind them)
 

"The image shows the faces of German POWs, captured by Americans, watching a film about a concentration camp. This forced confrontation brought Germans face-to-face with the worst works of the Third Reich. It must be really hard to go through what they did and look back knowing that everything that happened to them, all of their friends who were killed or maimed was in the name of something horrific, something totally repugnant to their own values." . . .

Another view of this scene that was taken from the back of the theater.

There was little such remorse coming from these Nazi SS troops: Muslim members of the Waffen-SS 13th division at prayer during their training in Germany, 1943

"The photo is taken during the division training at Neuhammer. The romantic notions that Himmler had about the Bosnian Muslims were probably significant in the division’s genesis. He was personally fascinated by the Islamic faith and believed that Islam created fearless soldiers. He envisioned the creation of a Bosnian SS division constituted solely of Bosnian Muslims in a manner similar to the Bosnian divisions of the old Austro-Hungarian Empire." . . .

OBAMA VISITS SOUTH DAKOTA FINALLY: And The Locals’ Reaction Is Nothing Short Of Epic

Clash Daily  "South Dakotans apparently have good BS detectors. Check out the expressions on their faces.

"Scroll down for picture and video."

"As President Barack Obama stood in front of graduates of a South Dakota community college on Friday, he spoke passionately, but the faces of the crowd in front of him told a different story."

Via UK Daily Mail:
 

Freddie Gray Case: Detailed Analysis of Motion to Recuse Prosecutor. An in-depth look at the defense motion.

 Motion for Recusal details Mosby’s many incontrovertible conflicts of interest

Legal Insurrection

 

. . . "Yesterday, one week to the day after the charges were brought, the defense lawyers collectively filed a motion to dismiss these charges and/or force the recusal of Mosby and her entire office from the case. We addressed the motion as a news item briefly last night, Freddie Gray case: Defense files motion to remove prosecutor.

"Now we dig deeper into the motion." . . .

 . . . "Needless to say, it is not the role of a local prosecutor to represent the interests of “demonstrators across America,” to accede to cries of “no justice no peace” from a rioting and looting mob, nor to lead a social “cause.” . . .
"Indeed, the motion to recuse notes that under Maryland statute, Rule 3.8, Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor, it is mandated that the prosecutor shall:

refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.

"Further, Rule 3.6 mandates that:

[a] lawyer who is participating or has participated in the investigation or litigation of a matter shall not make an extrajudicial statement that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know will be disseminated by means of public communications and will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudication proceeding in the matter.

 Other reasons for recusal to consider:

•  Mosby’s Public Reading of Charges, and her “Message” to the World

• Mosby’s Many Conflicts of Interest, Summarized

• Mosby’s Statement of Charges Jurisdictionally Sloppy

• Mosby’s Chief Prosecutor In Personal Relationship With Leading News Reporter

• Gray Family Lawyer is Also Mosby’s Lawyer, Financial Supporter

• Mosby’s Husband Represents District of Gray’s Arrested and Peak Rioting

• Mosby’s Assumption of Role of Investigator/Prosecutor Demands Recusal

• Mosby’s Prospective Loss of Immunity Creates Further Risk of Bias

. . . "Nothing about the prosecution of these six officers has screamed of exceptional intelligence and sound decision-making, but I suppose there’s always hope.
"As promised, here’s the motion for recusal in its entirety (exhibits included):

Motion for Dismissal or Recusal of Mosby

Obama Cheapens the Legacy of Our Fallen Heroes

American Thinker..."They died defending our country. They died that their sons and daughters and loved ones would be safe in their country. They died that their sons and daughters and loved ones rights and privileges as citizens would be preserved -- life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. And now Obama is cheapening their sacrifice. By administrative legislation, Obama is attempting to give the most precious right of citizenship -- the right to vote -- to illegals who don’t give a damn about the sacrifices of our fallen heroes.

"Illegals already have many (and even more) government benefits than citizens. They do vary from state to state but here is a rundown of state and national government overt and de facto benefits for illegals in NY.
. . . 
"By contrast Obama and team act as if they represent international interests and subsume national interest to perceived international interests. Who wants to be a parochial representative of National interests of a deeply flawed nation when one can be an international leader? After all, as we all know, charity begins abroad."

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/05/obama_cheapens_the_legacy_of_our_fallen_heroes.html#ixzz3ZeU7Mr47

 

 What's really behind Hillary Clinton's immigration gambit? (+video) . . . "In one fell swoop, Clinton distanced herself from her own past on immigration, her husband’s record, and President Obama. But most important, she staked out a position that goes well beyond anyone in the Republican presidential field.

“ 'Clinton was placing a stake in the ground way further out than any Republican can reach,” says Cal Jillson, a political scientist at Southern Methodist University in Dallas."

Obama’s Advisor Al Sharpton Corrupts MSNBC’s Bizarre News Network Even More

 Al Sharpton Trades Airtime to Leftist Union Bosses for a Price

Independent Sentinel  "Anyone who thinks MSNBC is in any way legitimate, needs to rethink that right away.
"Al Sharpton gives airtime on MSNBC to leftist union bosses in exchange for donations to his National Action Network.
"Sharpton, an Obama advisor, basically put MSNBC “news” up for sale. MSNBC is NBC.
"Since Politics Nation debuted on MSNBC on August 29, 2011, Al Sharpton’s nonprofit National Action Network has collected more than $2.38 million in contributions from unions, according to Department of Labor records.
"Sharpton in turn has used his show to promote pro-labor viewpoints, also inviting union leadership on as guests."  More at National Review Online.

Video here with good documentation

 

. . . "He also bullies for bucks.
"Stores pay hush money to Sharpton to keep him from protesting outside their buildings and claiming racism.
"Hush money for Al Sharpton and his National Action Network or NAN comes from a large number of corporations despite the fact that he is a complete fraud.
"He doesn’t pay his taxes, supports uprisings, creates racial divides, but is an advisor to the president who is apparently okay with it.
"The New York Times reported in November of last year that records show “more than $4.5 million in current state and federal tax liens against him and his for-profit businesses”.
"Sharpton operates like the mob and he’s been getting away with it for years.

And, surprise, the nonprofit is on Charity Navigator’s “watch list.”

. . . The next night, he devoted another Politics Nation segment to the topic. “Threats, intimidation, undemocratic moves: Right now, Michigan is the center of the right-wing attack on workers’ rights, and we must fight it,” Sharpton said.