Friday, September 15, 2017

More from my Hillary Watch

No automatic alt text available.
"Hillary Clinton launched her book tour Tuesday in which she’s blaming the Russians, Bernie Sanders, the DNC, sexism and Jim Comey for why she lost. A rescue operation is pending. When O.J. Simpson gets out of prison in three weeks, he’s going to help Hillary find the real reason she lost."   Comedian Argus Hamilton
Hillary's Media Criticisms Are a Perfect Snapshot of Why She Lost 
. . .  If Hillary Clinton truly believes that the thoroughly Democrat-friendly media was complicit in getting Trump elected, she is going to be seeing enemies everywhere. What the MSM really did was work overtime to prop up a thoroughly unlikable candidate. She just doesn't know that she's that candidate.
"Failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's book tour is barely underway and it is already revealing just how much the Electoral College helped the United States dodge a bullet last year. She's hurling out blame at an astonishing rate. One second it's Matt Lauer's fault. The next, Bernie Sanders is the culprit. When she pauses the blame litany for a brief moment, she's mad at Ivanka Trump

"If she hasn't blamed or complained about you yet, just wait a day or two, she'll get to you.

"The inability to articulate any flaws of her own is certainly a component in why she lost. She's imperious, entitled, and thinks she's owed the presidency because she stayed with Bubba when he publicly humiliated her. 

"But it is her bizarre assessment of the media's role in her loss that really shows how out of touch with reality she is.
. . . 
And she thinks there should be more liberal-leaning shows and publications to counteract a right-wing media apparatus that she calls "propaganda." [!]
Ethel C. Fenig  What Happened to the One Star Reviews?
. . . "And, according to Amazon, 95% of  its reviewers have given her blame-everyone-but-me tale of woe the highest rating of five whole stars.  But, according to the British Telegraph, Amazon has deleted many one star critical reviews . . ." 



No comments: