. . . "What won't be asked is the elephant-in-the-room question: why have we long segregated sports by sex? To admit that women can't win if we don't would enrage feminists. To admit that women are much safer this way would threaten to knock over decades of girl-power social engineering, wherein 120-pound wonder-women are depicted beating the pulp out of multiple men twice their size.
"Conservatives had better come to terms with the truth that there will be no Solomonic splitting the baby on this issue. Men are men all the time, and women are women all the time. If we stick to chromosomes, that's a truth easy to implement, even if it makes some people feel bad. If we base it on feelings, we're headed for a Hobbesian "all against all" hellscape of which the destruction of sports is only one of the lesser consequences."
. . . "So far, there has not exactly been a feminist hue and cry over men encroaching on women's sports. Only a few are speaking out. The problem for feminists is that the transgender putsch in the sporting world sets what was once a simmering pot of cognitive dissonance to boiling: throw out the delusional "men can be women" part, and you're left with the bald-faced truth that men and women are inherently, inexorably different. And not only are men and women different, but — heresy of all heresies — men are stronger than women. Feminists have been fighting this fact tooth and nail for decades, to the point where mentally disturbed or opportunistic males who can't win against other males can ride the feminist train all the way to snatching trophies from girls." . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment