USA Today beclowns itself trying to cover for Ketanji Brown Jackson saying she can’t define what a woman is -

"Interdisciplinary" means you mix fields, and you're saying you're a "feminist scientist," which is already Not a Scientist, and you mix that with "gender studies scholar[ship]," making you even more Not a Scientist. Ace of Spades

  American Thinker   "The media and other Democrats realize they have a problem when their president’s nominee for the nation’s highest court embraces postmodern BS like transgenderism’s claim that merely thinking of oneself as the opposite sex magically transforms that person into the opposite sex. Yet that is what Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson effectively did when she told Senator Blackburn that she couldn’t define what a woman is because “I’m not a biologist.”

"The mockery that ensued was painful because it exposed part of the nonsense that has become gospel on the left.  Judge Jackson took that nonsense position because she fears the transgender lunch mobs that, under the banner of ”intersectionality,” ae able to mobilize the angry identity groups that bully the rest of the left and much of the middle into compliance with their madness.

"Into the fray, however, jumped USA Today, which has become one of the most dogmatic left-wing outlets in the nation. In a “news” story written by Alia E. Dastagir,  dishonestly headlined, “Marsha Blackburn asked Ketanji Brown Jackson to define 'woman.' Science says there's no simple answer.' ”. . .

[Alia E. Dastagir's] bio says she's a "feminist scientist." You know -- the famous scientific field of Feminism.   

Her degree which she claims makes her a "feminist scientist" is in Noted Scientific Field "Sociomedical Sciences." Um, again, adding in "social" into the mix.

Not a Scientist.

And she's attached, of course, to the Women's and Gender Studies Department -- not to any scientific department. Not to the "Sociomedical Science" department, which of course does not exist because it's not a real thing.

So no, she's not a "scientist." She brands herself that way so she can make her gender studies claims sound "scientific" to idiots, such as those who populate the media.

You're not a "scientist" just because you "feel science-y." You're a scientist if you do the work of an actual scientist. She does not. She's just another idiot Gender Studies Marxist.. . .

Is Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson humble, or just an idiot? - American Thinker  . . .

         Usually, graduates of Harvard Law School display abundant omniscience.

But not Judge Jackson. Her retreat from admitting having any knowledge at all is a disgrace to armchair epistemologists everywhere. 

And so, is Judge Jackson suffering from a crippling excess of humility? Or is she just an idiot?

I’m neither a lexicographer nor a psychotherapist. But I know the answer, and so do you.

Ketanji Brown Jackson: A+ Credentials, D- Judge - The American Spectator | USA News and Politics   For Brown, politics trumps the law.