Are Democrats Really This Dumb Or Just Evil?

 Are Democrats Really This Dumb Or Just Evil? (townhall.com)

"Every once in a while, someone, some adult who you’d assume would know better, says something so stupid you really have to worry they’re having a stroke or suffered a closed head injury. More often than not, the person whose health you’re concerned about is a Democrat. Less frequently, however, that person is the former Speaker of the House. The longer Nancy Pelosi sticks around, the more likely it is that this level of idiocy will become the norm. 

"What did Nancy say? Upon the news breaking about the sealed indictments against former President Donald Trump, the 83-year-old tweeted, “The Grand Jury has acted upon the facts and the law. No one is above the law, and everyone has the right to a trial to prove innocence.” 

"Granted, Nancy is very old. That passage of time has not just led to her having so many facelifts that her ears touch in the back of her head, but to a slippage of epic proportion when it comes to her already limited intelligence. 

"Our system of justice does not afford defendants with the “right to a trial to prove innocence,” it provides the presumption of innocence unless and until they have been proven guilty. But let’s play Nancy’s game – the media drools over her like she’s something special, so let us follow her lead and provide Democrats with the opportunity to prove they are innocent. Anything less would be wrong, even an “injustice,” would it not?"

UPDATE: Bragg Forced To Admit Key Fact That Could Allow House To Investigate Trump Indictment (100percentfedup.com)  . . ."McCarthy has indicated that the House would be at liberty to investigate Trump’s indictment if the Manhattan District Attorney’s office used federal funds in furtherance of the case against him.

"On Friday, Bragg admitted that the office used $5,000 of federal funds during the investigation in to Trump’s alleged hush money payments to Stormy Daniels.

"While Bragg did admit to using federal funds in the investigation, he has otherwise refused to cooperate with the House’s inquiries in to the investigation and indictment of Trump.

"His office has rejected claims that the investigation was politically motivated, calling them ‘baseless’.

"Breitbart Reports– ". . .

BREAKING: Name of Judge Presiding Over Trump Case is Revealed… Here’s What Trump Had to Say About Him (100percentfedup.com)   . . ."In response to Trump’s claim that Meet Juan Merchan, the judge presiding over Trump's criminal case was “hand-picked” by Bragg and the Prosecutors, a spokesperson for New York State Courts reported that the District Attorney’s Office “absolutely” does not hand-pick judges for cases.

"Jose A. Fanjul, a former Manhattan district attorney, has a much more positive opinion of Merchan. Speaking to The New York Times, Fnajul(sp) said, “He is someone who reads every word on every page of every filing and every footnote, and then the cases that you cite to him.' ”