Wednesday, June 14, 2023

PRIDE: Goeth before a fall

. . ."So parents who don’t like what the schools might want to impose on their children are bad, but parents who want to permanently cut off their child’s genitalia are cool."  Nick Arama  

 Understanding the import of Biden’s White House ‘pride’ bash - American Thinker  . . ."We’ve been inundated with unseemly images showing Joe Biden’s decision to turn the White House into a prop for a “pride” celebration. Taken together, the images show we are witnessing a cultural coup that is as noteworthy as the slow-mo lawfare coup being carried out against Trump and his supporters. Still, there are heartening signs of rebellion." . . .

So, what does all this mean? This means that we are looking at the New World Order. After all, you can tell what a culture is by what its leadership celebrates. What this leadership is celebrating is sexual excess, deviant sexual behavior, child grooming, and profound body mutilation. And while Joe may be a semi-senile, highly corrupt buffoon, he is still the most prominent, public face of the American nation.

 A must-see: Karine Jean-Pierre Flounders While Addressing the Topless Trans Incident at the White House – RedState    . . ."Does that behavior really not reflect the event, though? Because from where I’m sitting, cases of indecent exposure seem to be commonplace at “pride” events all over the country. I’m not going to pretend that isn’t the case and that they are normally family-friendly. They aren’t, and that’s one big problem with the entire idea of “pride” month.

"This person didn’t just show up at the White House. He was invited, and while Jean-Pierre is correct that this hasn’t happened before, that’s the problem. It had not happened before, and it only happened under the tutelage of Joe Biden. Shouldn’t we all be asking why that is? Is there something intrinsic about “pride” celebrations and left-wing transgender orthodoxy that lead to these disgusting displays?"

I love the way this site describes the person: DISGUSTING! Biden Hosts Trans-Activist Who Goes Topless On White House Lawn [VIDEO] (100percentfedup.com)   . . ."Rose Montoya, a trans activist, took photos with Biden chatting with him before taking off his dress top and baring his breast implants. Twenty-Seven-year-old Montaya grabbed his implants and shook them up and down as onlookers called out, “Are we topless at the White House?” A few other trans-activist joined Montoya taking off their tops and revealing their mastectomy.

"Montoya said, “Trans rights are human rights” while posing with Biden. Montoya took to social media in an attempt to justify her grossly indecent behavior." . . .



Joe Biden To Group of LGBTQ+ Supporters: This Is the Most Courageous Group "I've seen at any time in the recent past"...Forgets 13 US Troops Who Were Slaughtered After Staying Behind In Hostile Afghanistan With No Support [VIDEO]

Joe Biden’s veneer as a friendly old man is over. He’s senile, but when he has moments of lucidity, he’s vindicative, cantankerous, and seems willing to use the power of his office to punish his political enemies.

President Joe Biden faced backlash Monday evening after a video from over the weekend went viral that showed a transgender activist taking his top off during a White House after meeting the president. Activist Rose Montoya, a man who identifies as a woman, met with Biden and his wife, Jill Biden, at the White House on Saturday during the administration’s celebration of Pride Month.Video shows Montoya meeting with the Bidens before standing on the White House lawn with his top off and hands covering his chest. The incident drew widespread condemnation online. “This is what happened at the White House pride event,”


“BREAKING: In the middle of Pride Month, Starbucks BANS Pride decorations in stores across the United States,” the group tweeted, saying that workers had already begun to share the news via social media.

. . ." They attributed the apparent change in policy to the recent backlash and boycotts aimed at retail giant Target over PRIDE displays that featured “coming out” greeting cards and “tuck-friendly” and “binding” swimwear for trans-identifying children and suggested that Starbucks was trying to avoid a similar drop-off in market capitalization."

No comments: