Tuesday, April 16, 2024

Megyn Kelly Destroys Jeffrey Toobin With Perfect Response When He Goes After Clarence Thomas Over Jan. 6

 Nick Arama – RedState  "We've seen Democrats push a lot of craziness over the years to attack folks on the right. 

"But one of the worst is the effort to try to somehow attack Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas over the riot on Jan. 6. 

"Case in point? This ridiculous smear from CNN's Jeffrey Toobin. How does anyone want to have anything to do with this guy?" 

 "In oral argument today, Justice Thomas is minimizing the severity of the 1/6 insurrection at the Capitol," he claimed. 

"Perhaps that's because his wife was part of the conspiracy. What a disgrace that he's sitting on this case. #SCOTUS."

"First, there was no insurrection, and second, there was no evidence that Thomas' wife Ginni was involved in the riot. This is just a liberal conspiracy talking point. And it's disgusting that they do this. 

"But hey, why should Toobin let facts get in the way? 

"Far from a "disgrace," Thomas has served for years, adhering to the Constitution despite the virulent hatred and attacks from the left since he was nominated. But they have ramped up the attacks even more under Joe Biden. 

Toobin obviously didn't want anyone to reply to his post since he cut off regular replies to his tweet. Of course, that doesn't stop people from quote-tweeting replies, and as many people pointed out, perhaps Toobin should be the last one to talk about anyone else being a "disgrace." 

"Now, you had to know the replies to his post were lit. Megyn Kelly had the perfect response, speaking for the rest of us. 

Warning for graphic language: https://twitter.com/megynkelly/status/1780257362432966781

"Kelly was referencing the incident where Toobin was on camera during a Zoom call. After that, he should have just slunk away and hid himself, because that's not something people are ever going to forget. That's if he has any shame at all, which clearly he doesn't. And it says so much about CNN that after that, they are still somehow having him back on their network. A report last month said that he was a "guest" still at that point. He's made several appearances since the beginning of the year. But who can look at him and hold him in any kind of respect after that? Maybe he should handle his own affairs and put his own house in order." . . . 

No comments: