. . . "Nevada U.S. Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto used the excuse that “the infrastructure needed to manufacture incandescent light bulbs has been dismantled, repurposed, and restarting that production would not make economic sense.” Umm, yes it would, senator, if consumers started demanding more Edison bulbs. That’s how the market works."
 |
| ChatGPT: Expensive Light Bulbs |
"The worst thing George W. Bush did while president wasn’t the war with Iraq. It was signing the “Energy Independence and Security Act,” which, among other ill effects, produced today’s ban on incandescent light bulbs. Our most fervent hope is that Republicans will correct this mistake while they still have the chance.
"Those inexpensive incandescent bulbs, invented right here in the good ol’ U.S. of A. by Thomas Edison, were deemed by our Washington masters to be too inefficient. And, because the public was told we needed to “save energy,” the law mandated efficiency standards that traditional bulbs could never meet.
"And so, despite the fact that millions of consumers prefer traditional lightbulbs for regular home use, they aren’t made anymore. Now, buying replacement bulbs has transmogrified from a simple process of deciding what wattage you needed to an overly complicated exercise in deciding which of an array of different types of lighting devices – all wildly more expensive than the old Edison bulbs – will suit your lighting needs.
"Buyers today have to consider things such as lumens, the color “temperature” measured in Kelvin (the higher the Kelvin value, the harsher the light), whether the bulb will work with a dimmer switch (you also have to make sure your dimmer switch will work with the bulb), and something called CRI, which measures how accurately a light source displays colors compared to natural light. (You’re advised to look for bulbs with a CRI of 80 or higher.)
"Everyone following this?
"But fear not, we are told, those complicated, pricey LED bulbs last far longer and use much less electricity than those bad old Edison-style bulbs, more than paying for themselves over their lifetimes. Except they often fail long before their promised expiration date because, unlike incandescents, LEDs require a circuit board with parts that can easily, and often do, fail before the diodes die. So any claim of lifetime savings from these bulbs can’t be trusted.
"Worse still, it appears that this massive uncontrolled government experiment in a heretofore unknown lighting source could be having severe health effects on the population.
No comments:
Post a Comment