"But a lesbian activist in Minneapolis gets herself killed while interfering with an ICE operation—and the country decided it wants amnesty? (Yes, on Sunday night, liberals on CNN couldn’t stop squealing about how this could be Trump’s “Nixon goes to China” moment—because nothing makes riveting TV like shopworn clichés.)"
"Actual headlines since the election:
“ICE After the Blowout — The midterms were a backlash to Trump’s immigration policies” — The Atlantic (Nov. 7, 2026)
“Voters rebuke Trump administration’s ICE raids and immigration policies at the polls” — NPR (Nov. 6 and Nov. 9, 2026)
“Midterm Voters Disapproved Of Trump’s … Immigration Policies.” — Forbes (Nov. 9, 2026)
I’d like to brag, but can I really take credit? Wasn’t it blazingly obvious to everyone? All you needed to do was look at every other election. [Americans vote for mass deportations.] MEDIA: VOTERS DEMAND AMNESTY!
The New York Times is at least sneaky in its phrasing. One article gaped in disbelief that Stephen Miller, the president’s new chief of staff, was not “scaling back the hard-line immigration approach” — the one that delivered all seven battleground states and the popular vote 24 months ago — “that contributed to Republicans’ steep losses.”
What can’t be said to have “contributed” to the GOP’s midterm losses? Some voters’ belief that Trump is a Lizard Man probably “contributed” to the result. The GOP’s obsession with appointing women to Senate seats definitely “contributed” to the outcome.
The Times also carped that Miller intends to “forge ahead with an agenda that many voters rejected.” A few paragraphs later, the article added that the rascal also intends to “pursue more of the agenda that many voters rejected.” Can you believe the gall of this guy? He was going to both “forge ahead with” and “pursue” an agenda that many voters rejected.
How many is “many”? Seventy-seven million voted for Trump just two years ago. However many voted against Republicans in the midterms, it wasn’t 77 million.
The alleged voter mandate against enforcing our immigration laws is hard to believe inasmuch as, in 2024, the same country voted for a president who campaigned on implementing the “largest domestic deportation operation in American history,” saying he’d triple the size of ICE, and use Border Patrol, National Guard troops, and local law enforcement to remove illegals.
But a lesbian activist in Minneapolis gets herself killed while interfering with an ICE operation—and the country decided it wants amnesty? (Yes, on Sunday night, liberals on CNN couldn’t stop squealing about how this could be Trump’s “Nixon goes to China” moment—because nothing makes riveting TV like shopworn clichés.) . . . More.
No comments:
Post a Comment