"Making certain these women were not believed was Hillary Clinton’s job, and she did a capable job of it."Thomas Lifson "The story of Bill Cosby’s arraignment yesterday on charges of rape got headline treatment across the nation and signals very bad news for the candidacy of Hillary Clinton. Legal experts say the case against Cosby is weak, unless the testimony of some of the 52 women who have complained of sexual predation by Cosby can be admitted as testimony, establishing a pattern of behavior, or modus operandi, as the lawyers like to say.
"The legal proceedings against Cosby are certain to be a major topic of discussion in the months ahead. Much of that discussion will center on the proposition that if so many women are making similar complaints, that adds believability. And the question then becomes: “Why weren’t they believed or even listened to before?”
"In Cosby’s case, the answer has to do with the lovable image he projected and the powerful financial interests in keeping him in the public’s fond regard.
"The very same analysis applies directly to Bill Clinton. The list of women believed to have been his sexual prey may not run to 52, but it includes:" . . . Read more
 |
| conservativecritic |
. . .
"But this week, Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus said that while it may be hard for Clinton supporters to admit, "in the larger scheme of things, Bill Clinton’s conduct toward women is far worse than any of the offensive things that Trump has said." She continued:" . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment