Trump grand juror gives smiling, laughing media tour about possible indictments
"When we watched Jury Foreman Emily Kohrs’ bizarre performances on one hate-Trump “news” show after another in February, my husband turned to me and said: “Out of 23 jurors couldn’t they have chosen a sane person to be the foreman?” We assumed that members of the jury chose their own foreman, as they do for jury trials in most states. We later learned that grand jury foremen are chosen at random in Georgia, much like wearing a blindfold while one chooses a rotten apple out of the barrel. No brains needed.
"An ethical prosecutor would have made sure this 30-year-old child did not become a juror. THAT is what the voir dire process is for. But ethics did not hinder Fulton County DA Fani Willis in her pursuit to “get Trump.” Raised in Washington DC by an “old style” terrorist, a Black Panther (her father), Willis became a hate-filled “social justice warrior” as a child. Now that the 98-page indictment has been issued will this yellow-toothed, self-proclaimed witch, Emily Kohrs, make the rounds of TV studios again? My husband and I are waiting anxiously for her return performances.
TO ENJOY EMILY KOHRS’ PERFORMANCES, CLICK HERE Share
"Within days of being sworn in as district attorney in January 2021, Willis started her investigation to “get Trump.” She assembled the grand jury in May 2022. Trump declared his candidacy in November 2022, so the race was on to get the indictment issued so the trial process would take him off the campaign trail.
"In order to obtain an indictment, it only takes 12 out of the 23 jurors to vote “yes, we need to indict the leading 2024 presidential candidate and his attorneys.” [His attorneys? This has never been done before and will be the topic of a future article.] One wonders how many jurors voted for Trump in 2016 and/or 2020. When selecting the jury, did the prosecutor ask them? Did this unethical prosecutor dismiss all Trump voters from the jury pool?" . . .
Alan Dershowitz: Fulton County Is Indicting Trump for What Democrats Did in 2000 – RedState . . ."Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, speaking to Fox News Digital, criticized the pending indictment, calling Trump’s actions "very similar" to that of Al Gore’s legal strategy in the Bush v. Gore case that decided the 2000 presidential election.
"We challenged the election, and we did much of the things that are being done today and people praised us. I wrote a bestselling book called ‘Supreme Injustice. Now they're making it a crime," Dershowitz said.
"In a conversation with Fox News host Sean Hannity, Dershowitz criticized the district attorney’s office for expanding the RICO statute to “include political objections,” observing:
"You cannot start making crimes out of things that the Democrats did -- Tilden Hayes, John Kennedy election, 2000 election, 2016 election, Jamie Raskin gets up and does some of the same things. These are political actions that the Constitution prefers us to take rather than going out on the streets and rioting. We're supposed to go to court. We're supposed to go to Congress. You can't make those things crimes. And you can't expand the RICO statute to now include political objections." . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment