The book, which El-Sayed regularly promoted on his podcast, denounces ‘fetishizing distinctions between violence and nonviolence’
Though he has made opposition to wealth a hallmark of his campaign, El-Sayed has faced scrutiny for an international real estate portfolio and luxury watch collection.
"An Abdul El-Sayed supporter said voters are “stupid” and the best way to win is to hide the truth."
BREAKING: An Abdul El-Sayed supporter said voters are “stupid” and the best way to win is to hide the truth.
— Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) August 5, 2026
Abdul El-Sayed and Hasan Piker nodded in agreement.
“The encouraging thing is that people are stupid.” pic.twitter.com/bEEkL1poaq
. . . "Abdul El-Sayed, the newly minted Democratic nominee for Senate in Michigan, repeatedly promoted to his podcast listeners a notorious book that encourages violent rioting and claims the U.S. government "kills untold millions," the Washington Free Beacon can reveal.
"El-Sayed made the plug for the book, Let This Radicalize You, at least 10 times on his podcast, America Dissected." . . .
"The unabashedly anti-American book, which was published in May 2023, promises readers "a practical and imaginative resource for activists and organizers building power in an era of destabilization and catastrophe," according to its Amazon description—and it does not disappoint.
"In chapter six: "'Violence' in Social Movements," the authors dismiss peaceful protests as submissive to the state and argue that violent protesters should not necessarily be considered "bad."
"'Fetishizing distinctions between violence and nonviolence can lead to the indulgence of rhetoric about 'good' and 'bad' protesters, where 'peaceful' protesters are celebrated and 'violent' protesters—for example, those who engage in property destruction that disrupts profit—are viewed as disposable and disreputable," the pair writes.
"'And when they refer to 'peaceful protest,' they are talking about cooperative protest that obediently stays within the lines drawn by the state."
"This licenses people to care about the cause being protested without caring about what happens to the 'bad' protesters. For example, even as significant numbers of people supported the uprisings following the racist murder of George Floyd, many fewer people vocally defended the rights of protesters who were arrested for acts of property destruction and funneled into the racist carceral system," they added." . . . More.

